Exploring Flexible Strategies in Engineering Systems Using Screening Models Applications to Offshore Petroleum Projects by Jijun Lin

Engineering Systems, such as offshore petroleum exploration and production systems, generally require a significant amount of capital investment under various technical and market uncertainties. Choosing appropriate designs and field development strategies is a very challenging task for decision makers because they need to integrate information from multiple disciplines to make decisions while the various uncertainties are still evolving. Traditional engineering practice often focuses on finding "the optimal" solution under deterministic assumptions very early in the conceptual study phase, which leaves a large amount of opportunity unexploited, particularly the value of flexible strategies. This thesis proposes a new approach to tackle this issue exploring flexible strategies using midfidelity screening models. The screening models interconnect and model physical systems, project development, and economics quantitatively at the mid-fidelity level, which allows decision-makers to explore different strategies with significantly less computational effort compared to high fidelity models. The screening models are at a level of detail that gives reliable rank orders of different strategies under realistic assumptions. Flexibilities are identified and classified at strategic, tactical, and operational levels over a system's lifecycle. Intelligent decision rules will then exercise flexible strategies as uncertainties unfold. This approach can be applied as a "front-end" strategic tool to conduct virtual experiments. This helps identify good strategies from a large number of possibilities and then discipline-based tools can be used for detailed engineering design and economics evaluation. The present study implemented the use of such screening models for petroleum exploration and production projects. Through two simulation case studies, this thesis illustrates that flexible strategies can significantly improve a project's Expected Net Present Value (ENPV), mitigate downside risks, and capture upside opportunities. As shown in the flexible tieback oilfield development case study, the simulations predicted a 82% improvement of ENPV by enabling architectural and operational flexibility. The distributions of outcomes for different strategies are shown in terms of Value-at-Risk-Gain curves. This thesis develops and demonstrates a generic four-step process and a simulation framework for screening flexible strategies with multi-domain uncertainty for capital-intensive engineering systems. Thesis Supervisor: Olivier de Weck Title: Associate Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems Associate Director of the Engineering Systems Division

[1]  Robert A. Adey Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design , 1993 .

[2]  Hugh McManus,et al.  A framework for understanding uncertainty and its mitigation and exploitation in complex systems , 2006, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[3]  Reidar Brumer Bratvold,et al.  The Value of Flexibility in Managing Uncertainty in Oil and Gas Investments , 2002 .

[4]  M. Armstronga,et al.  Incorporating technical uncertainty in real option valuation of oil projects , 2004 .

[5]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  Flexibility in component manufacturing systems: evaluation framework and case study , 2007, J. Intell. Manuf..

[6]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  IDENTIFYING REAL OPTIONS TO IMPROVE THE DESIGN OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS , 2008 .

[7]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  ESD Terms and Definitions (Version 12) , 2001 .

[8]  Denis José Schiozer,et al.  Comparison of Techniques for Risk Analysis Applied to Petroleum-Field Development , 2005 .

[9]  Suresh P. Sethi,et al.  Flexibility in manufacturing: A survey , 1990 .

[10]  Stephen L. Kidd A systematic method for valuing a product platform strategy , 1998 .

[11]  Daniel P. Thunnissen,et al.  Uncertainty Classification for the Design and Development of Complex Systems , 2003 .

[12]  Keshav Narayanan,et al.  Better Field Development Decisions from Multi-Scenario, Interdependent Reservoir, Well, and Facility Simulations , 2003 .

[13]  L. Durlofsky,et al.  Decision analysis under uncertainty for smart well deployment , 2004 .

[14]  Jef Caers,et al.  Assessment of Global Uncertainty for Early Appraisal of Hydrocarbon Fields , 2004 .

[15]  Denis José Schiozer,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis In Reservoir Production Forecasts During Appraisal And Pilot Production Phases , 2001 .

[16]  Marco Antonio Guimarães Dias,et al.  Investment in Information in Petroleum, Real Options and Revelation , 2002 .

[17]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  A stochastic programming approach to planning of offshore gas field developments under uncertainty in reserves , 2004, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[18]  김지수,et al.  경제적 Manufacturing Flexibility 관리를 위한 개념적 체계 , 1997 .

[19]  Stan Cullick,et al.  How Integrated Field Studies Help Asset Teams Make Optimal Field Development Decisions , 2008 .

[20]  Rania Hassan,et al.  Value-at-risk analysis for real options in complex engineered systems , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[21]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  Staged Deployment of Communications Satellite Constellations in Low Earth Orbit , 2004, J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun..

[22]  Olivier de Weck,et al.  Platform identification using Design Structure Matrices , 2005 .

[23]  Richard de Neufville,et al.  USING REAL OPTIONS TO INCREASE THE VALUE OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS , 2007 .

[24]  Joseph H. Saleh,et al.  Flexibility: a multi-disciplinary literature review and a research agenda for designing flexible engineering systems , 2009 .

[25]  Chung-Li Tseng,et al.  Valuing Flexibility in Infrastructure Expansion , 2003 .

[26]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  Reservoir management decision-making in the presence of geological uncertainty , 2000 .

[27]  D. Gerwin Manufacturing flexibility: a strategic perspective , 1993 .

[28]  Matthew Robin Silver,et al.  Designing sustainable heavy lift launch vehicle architectures adaptability, lock-in, and system evolution , 2005 .

[29]  L. Trigeorgis Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation , 1996 .

[30]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  Determining Product Platform Extent , 2006 .

[31]  田口 玄一,et al.  System of experimental design : engineering methods to optimize quality and minimize costs , 1987 .

[32]  Emmanuel Manceau,et al.  Uncertainty management: From geological scenarios to production scheme optimization , 2004 .

[33]  Curt Blaine Cooprider Equipment selection and assembly system design under multiple cost scenarios , 1989 .

[34]  James Keller System architecture of offshore oil production systems , 2008 .

[35]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  A Classification of Uncertainty for Early Product and System Design , 2007 .

[36]  Willard Lennox Simmons,et al.  A Framework for Decision Support in Systems Architecting , 2008 .

[37]  Manoj K. Malhotra,et al.  A theoretical framework for analyzing the dimensions of manufacturing flexibility , 1999 .

[38]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  Time‐expanded decision networks: A framework for designing evolvable complex systems , 2007, Syst. Eng..

[39]  Christopher J. Jablonowski,et al.  Estimating the Cost of Errors in Estimates Used During Concept Selection , 2008 .

[40]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  Optimal investment in product-flexible manufacturing capacity , 1990 .

[41]  F. A. Riddiford,et al.  Optimising Multi-Field Developments Under Uncertainty , 1998 .

[42]  Morten W. Lund,et al.  Valuing Flexibility in Offshore Petroleum Projects , 2000, Ann. Oper. Res..

[43]  Liang Y Liu,et al.  How to Evaluate and Invest in Emerging A/E/C Technologies under Uncertainty , 2003 .

[44]  Paulien M. Herder,et al.  Addressing flexibility during process and infrastructure systems conceptual design: real options perspective , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[45]  Afreen Siddiqi,et al.  Modeling Methods and Conceptual Design Principles for Reconfigurable Systems , 2008 .

[46]  Karen Willcox,et al.  A VALUE-BASED APPROACH FOR COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT CONCEPTUAL DESIGN , 2002 .

[47]  Paulien M. Herder,et al.  Addressing Uncertainties in the Design and Operation of Residential Distributed Energy Resources: Case study of a Micro-CHP System , 2007 .

[48]  G. C. Watkins Characteristics of North Sea oil reserve appreciation , 2002 .

[49]  Johan Grievink,et al.  Framework for proper integration of flexibility in conceptual designs of energy and industrial infrastructures , 2005 .

[50]  Dava J Newman,et al.  Flexibility in system design and implications for aerospace systems. , 2003, Acta astronautica.

[51]  R. Neufville,et al.  Identification of Real Options “ in ” Projects , 2006 .

[52]  Eun Suk Suh,et al.  Flexible product platforms: framework and case study , 2007, DAC 2006.

[53]  Stephen C. Graves,et al.  Equipment selection and task assignment for multiproduct assembly system design , 1988 .

[54]  Konstantinos C. Kalligeros Platforms and Real Options in Large-Scale Engineering Systems , 2006 .