Stochastic uncertainty quantification of seismic performance of complex large-scale structures using response spectrum method

Abstract Imprecision and uncertainty always exist in engineering structures. In recent years, an increasing emphasis is placed on quantifying structural performance by explicitly modeling uncertainties. A limited number of studies have been conducted on the uncertain analysis of complex structures. Because the time-history response analysis (THRA) is extremely time-consuming to solve uncertain problems of complex structures, a stochastic finite element method (SFEM) using response spectrum analysis (RSA) has been developed to analyze full-scale lattice dome structures with uncertain variables in this paper. Based on the proposed method, the lattice dome structure under different earthquake intensity levels is investigated and the probabilistic structural demands are quantified. Compared with the perfect dome, the results show that the mean deformations and reaction force values at supports caused by earthquakes increase in the uncertain dome and the mean axial force values of the members decrease. The structural demands present larger uncertain intervals with the increase in earthquake intensity, thus, the calculation results in the deterministic analyses can be further improved by the uncertainty quantification. Finally, the effects of uncertain variables on the structural demands are discussed. Unlike the findings in the THRA, the structural imperfections are the most important factor affecting structural performance in the RSA. Moreover, compared with THRA, a larger sample size can be used in the RSA to predict the seismic performance of complex structures with higher precision. This study provides possible applications for the probability-based performance analysis of other large-scale structures with uncertain parameters.

[1]  R. H. Wagoner,et al.  Variation and consistency of Young’s modulus in steel , 2016 .

[2]  Vissarion Papadopoulos,et al.  Stochastic stability analysis of steel tubes with random initial imperfections , 2013 .

[3]  Feng Fan,et al.  Elasto-plastic stability of single-layer reticulated domes with initial curvature of members , 2012 .

[4]  Liborio Cavaleri,et al.  A strategy for the finite element modeling of FRP-confined concrete columns subjected to preload , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[5]  Dimitris Diamantidis,et al.  The Joint Committee on Structural Safety (JCSS) Probabilistic Model Code for New and Existing Structures , 1999 .

[6]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  A critical examination of seismic response uncertainty analysis in earthquake engineering , 2013 .

[7]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Dynamic response of structures with uncertain damping , 1990 .

[8]  Denis Kelliher,et al.  Statistical characterisation and modelling of random geometric imperfections in cylindrical shells , 2012 .

[9]  Michael Willford,et al.  Damping in tall buildings – uncertainties and solutions , 2008 .

[10]  Mark G. Stewart,et al.  Human Error and Reliability of Multistory Reinforced-Concrete Building Construction , 2004 .

[11]  P. Castaldo,et al.  Response spectrum analysis of frame structures: reliability-based comparison between complete quadratic combination and damping-adjusted combination , 2019, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[12]  Lei Xu,et al.  Progressive‐Failure Analysis of Buildings Subjected to Abnormal Loading , 2005 .

[13]  Luca Bruno,et al.  Effects of the Equivalent Geometric Nodal Imperfections on the stability of single layer grid shells , 2016 .

[14]  Masoud Sanayei,et al.  Significance of Modeling Error in Structural Parameter Estimation , 2001 .

[15]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Structural stability analysis of single-layer reticulated shells with stochastic imperfections , 2016 .

[16]  J. Bonada,et al.  Selection of the initial geometrical imperfection in nonlinear FE analysis of cold-formed steel rack columns , 2012 .

[17]  Huidong Zhang,et al.  Nonlinear dynamic analysis method for large-scale single-layer lattice domes with uncertain-but-bounded parameters , 2020 .

[18]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Determination of human error probabilities for offshore platform musters , 2005 .

[19]  Herbert A. Mang,et al.  The Fifth World Congress on Computational Mechanics , 2002 .

[20]  Qi Zonglin Study on the influence of construction deviation random distribution on the integral stability of suspend-dome , 2007 .

[21]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Reliability analysis of uncertain structures using earthquake response spectra , 2011 .

[22]  N. Null Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 2003 .

[23]  R. E. Melchers,et al.  Human Errors and Structural Reliability , 1995 .

[24]  Bruce R. Ellingwood DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ERROR EFFECTS ON STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY , 1987 .

[25]  M. T. Hanna,et al.  Effect of geometric imperfections on the ultimate moment capacity of cold-formed sigma-shape sections , 2017 .

[26]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, Third edition , 1994 .

[27]  Xinqun Zhu,et al.  Seismic performance analysis of a large-scale single-layer lattice dome with a hybrid three-directional seismic isolation system , 2020 .

[28]  Yu Ruifang,et al.  Simplifications of CQC method and CCQC method , 2007 .

[29]  Wolfgang Graf,et al.  Uncertainty in Damage Assessment of Structures and Its Numerical Simulation , 2001 .