A review of the literature on DEA models under common set of weights

Purpose Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a mathematical method for the evaluation of the relative efficiency of a set of alternatives, which produces multiple outputs by consuming multiple inputs. Each unit is evaluated on the basis of the weighted output over the weighted input ratio with a free selection of weights and is allowed to select its own weighting scheme for both inputs and outputs so that the individual evaluation is optimized. However, several situations can be found in which the variability between weighting profiles is unsuitable. In those cases, it seems more appropriate to consider a common vector of weights. The purpose of this paper is to include a systematic revision of the existing literature regarding the procedures to determine a common set of weights (CSW) in the DEA context. The contributions are classified with respect to the methodology and to the main aim of the procedure. The discussion and findings of this paper provide insights into future research on the topic. Design/methodology/approach This paper includes a systematic revision of the existing literature about the procedures to determine a CSW in the DEA context. The contributions are classified with respect to the methodology and to the main aim of the procedure. Findings The discussion and findings of the literature review might insights into future research on the topic. Originality/value This papers revise the state of the art on the topic of models with CSW in DEA methodology and propose a systematic classification of the contributions with respect to several criteria. The paper would be useful for both theoretical and practical future research on the topic.

[1]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Egoist's Dilemma: A DEA Game , 2003 .

[2]  Mehdi Toloo,et al.  Finding the most efficient DMUs in DEA: An improved integrated model , 2007, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[3]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  Improving the discriminating power of DEA: focus on globally efficient units , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[4]  Marianela Carrillo,et al.  A multiobjective DEA approach to ranking alternatives , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  A Common Set of Weight Approach Using an Ideal Decision Making Unit in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2012 .

[6]  B. Golany,et al.  Controlling Factor Weights in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1991 .

[7]  T. Anderson,et al.  The Fixed Weighting Nature of A Cross-Evaluation Model , 2002 .

[8]  Ahmad Makui,et al.  A GOAL PROGRAMMING METHOD FOR FINDING COMMON WEIGHTS IN DEA WITH AN IMPROVED DISCRIMINATING POWER FOR EFFICIENCY , 2008 .

[9]  Adli Mustafa,et al.  Cross-ranking of Decision Making Units in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2013 .

[10]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Data envelopment analysis : a handbook of models and methods , 2015 .

[11]  Liang Liang,et al.  Ranking decision making units by imposing a minimum weight restriction in the data envelopment analysis , 2009 .

[12]  Y. H. Liu,et al.  Determining a common set of weights in a DEA problem using a separation vector , 2011, Math. Comput. Model..

[13]  Qingyuan Zhu,et al.  Allocating a fixed cost based on a DEA-game cross efficiency approach , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  A common-weights DEA model for centralized resource reduction and target setting , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[15]  Ali Payan Common set of weights approach in fuzzy DEA with an application , 2015, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[16]  Reza Kiani Mavi,et al.  Developing Common Set of Weights with Considering Nondiscretionary Inputs and Using Ideal Point Method , 2013, J. Appl. Math..

[17]  Jordi Massó,et al.  On the Structure of Cooperative and Competitive Solutions for a Generalized Assignment Game , 2014, J. Appl. Math..

[18]  S. M. Hatefi,et al.  A common weight MCDA–DEA approach to construct composite indicators , 2010 .

[19]  M. Rostamy-Malkhalifeh,et al.  A Full Ranking for Decision Making Units Using Ideal and Anti-Ideal Points in DEA , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[20]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  Efficiency evaluation in two-stage data envelopment analysis under a fuzzy environment: A common-weights approach , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[22]  Qingyuan Zhu,et al.  A new data envelopment analysis based approach for fixed cost allocation , 2019, Ann. Oper. Res..

[23]  Ali Asghar Foroughi,et al.  New approaches for determining a common set of weights for a voting system , 2012, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[24]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Scaling units via the canonical correlation analysis in the DEA context , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Saber Saati,et al.  An algorithm for determining common weights by concept of membership function , 2015 .

[27]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  A note on some of DEA models and finding efficiency and complete ranking using common set of weights , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[28]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Extended DEA-Discriminant Analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  A. A. Foroughi,et al.  A modified common weight model for maximum discrimination in technology selection , 2012 .

[30]  Kim Fung Lam,et al.  Finding a Common Set of Weights for Ranking Decision-Making Units in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2016 .

[31]  Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  A Method for Discriminating Efficient Candidates with Ranked Voting Data by Common Weights , 2012 .

[32]  Ahmad Makui,et al.  Using CSW weight’s in UTASTAR method , 2012 .

[33]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Within-group common weights in DEA: An analysis of power plant efficiency , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  Improved common weight MCDM model for technology selection , 2008 .

[35]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Using common weights and efficiency invariance principles for resource allocation and target setting , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[36]  Ahmad Makui,et al.  A compromise solution approach for finding common weights in DEA: an improvement to Kao and Hung's approach , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[37]  Jie Wu,et al.  Determination of the weights for the ultimate cross efficiency using Shapley value in cooperative game , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[38]  Ya Chen,et al.  Selection of Six Sigma project with interval data: common weight DEA model , 2018, Kybernetes.

[39]  Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Common weights in dynamic network DEA with goal programming approach for performance assessment of insurance companies in Iran , 2018 .

[40]  Mehdi Toloo,et al.  The most efficient unit without explicit inputs: An extended MILP-DEA model , 2013 .

[41]  S. Snelgrove,et al.  Medication Monitoring for People with Dementia in Care Homes: The Feasibility and Clinical Impact of Nurse-Led Monitoring , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[42]  Adel Hatami-Marbini,et al.  Allocating fixed resources and setting targets using a common-weights DEA approach , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[43]  Harish Garg,et al.  A new multi-component DEA approach using common set of weights methodology and imprecise data: an application to public sector banks in India with undesirable and shared resources , 2017, Ann. Oper. Res..

[44]  W. Cook,et al.  A data envelopment model for aggregating preference rankings , 1990 .

[45]  De-An Wu,et al.  A DEA- COMPROMISE PROGRAMMING MODEL FOR COMPREHENSIVE RANKING , 2004 .

[46]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Finding a Common Weight Vector of Data Envelopment Analysis Based upon Bargaining Game , 2013 .

[47]  E. E. Karsak *,et al.  Practical common weight multi-criteria decision-making approach with an improved discriminating power for technology selection , 2005 .

[48]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  A modified common set of weights method to complete ranking DMUs , 2011 .

[49]  Donna L. Retzlaff-Roberts Relating discriminant analysis and data envelopment analysis to one another , 1996, Comput. Oper. Res..

[50]  Bo Guo,et al.  Determining Common Weights in Data Envelopment Analysis with Shannon's Entropy , 2014, Entropy.

[51]  Hong Yan,et al.  Bargaining game model in the evaluation of decision making units , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[52]  Mehdi Toloo,et al.  An integrated data envelopment analysis and mixed integer non-linear programming model for linearizing the common set of weights , 2019, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[53]  Tahir Ahmad,et al.  Ranking DMUs by Calculating the Interval Efficiency with a Common Set of Weights in DEA , 2014, J. Appl. Math..

[54]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Demystifying DEA — A Visual Interactive Approach Based on Multiple Criteria Analysis , 1993 .

[55]  Marvin D. Troutt,et al.  Derivation of the Maximin Efficiency Ratio model from the maximum decisional efficiency principle , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[56]  Marvin D. Troutt,et al.  A maximum decisional efficiency estimation principle , 1995 .

[57]  Yongjun Li,et al.  Supplier evaluation based on Nash bargaining game model , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[58]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  Improved common weight MCDM model for technology selection , 2008 .

[59]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA-discriminant analysis in the view of goal programming , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[60]  Yongjun Li,et al.  Determining common weights in data envelopment analysis based on the satisfaction degree , 2016, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[61]  Per Joakim Agrell,et al.  Endogenous Weights Under DEA Control , 2010 .

[62]  Fuh-Hwa Franklin Liu,et al.  Ranking of units on the DEA frontier with common weights , 2008, Comput. Oper. Res..

[63]  Jafar Sadeghi,et al.  Proposing a method for fixed cost allocation using DEA based on the efficiency invariance and common set of weights principles , 2017, Math. Methods Oper. Res..

[64]  C. Kao,et al.  Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[65]  Mehdi Toloo An epsilon-free approach for finding the most efficient unit in DEA , 2014 .

[66]  B. Golany,et al.  Alternate methods of treating factor weights in DEA , 1993 .

[67]  John J. Rousseau,et al.  Two-person ratio efficiency games , 1995 .

[68]  H. Omrani,et al.  Common weights data envelopment analysis with uncertain data: A robust optimization approach , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[69]  Qingyuan Zhu,et al.  Allocating a fixed cost across the decision making units with two-stage network structures , 2018, Omega.

[70]  I. Contreras A DEA-inspired procedure for the aggregation of preferences , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[71]  G. Tzeng,et al.  A MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING APPROACH TO DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[72]  Ying Luo,et al.  Common weights for fully ranking decision making units by regression analysis , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[73]  Maziar Salahi,et al.  An optimistic robust optimization approach to common set of weights in DEA , 2016 .

[74]  Hashem Omrani,et al.  Construct a composite indicator based on integrating Common Weight Data Envelopment Analysis and principal component analysis models: An application for finding development degree of provinces in Iran , 2019 .

[75]  Per Joakim Agrell,et al.  Endogenous Generalized Weights under DEA Control , 2010 .

[76]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A novel common set of weights method for multi-period efficiency measurement using mean-variance criteria , 2018, Measurement.

[77]  Kenjiro T. Miura,et al.  Drawable Region of the Generalized Log Aesthetic Curves , 2013, J. Appl. Math..

[78]  Wout Dullaert,et al.  Reliable estimation of suppliers’ total cost of ownership: An imprecise data envelopment analysis model with common weights , 2019, Omega.

[79]  S Borzoei,et al.  COMMON WEIGHTS FOR THE EVALUATION OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS WITH NONLINEAR VIRTUAL INPUTS AND OUTPUTS , 2013 .

[80]  Yi-Tui Chen,et al.  A Common Weight Approach to Construct Composite Indicators: The Evaluation of Fourteen Emerging Markets , 2018 .

[81]  J. Javier Brey,et al.  A DEA based procedure for the selection of subgroups , 2014 .

[82]  W. Cook,et al.  A multiple criteria decision model with ordinal preference data , 1991 .

[83]  S. Mehrabian,et al.  Ranking decision-making units using common weights in DEA , 2014 .

[84]  Fuh-Hwa Franklin Liu,et al.  A systematic procedure to obtain a preferable and robust ranking of units , 2009, Comput. Oper. Res..

[85]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Ranking of units by positive ideal DMU with common weights , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[86]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[87]  A. Memariani,et al.  Reducing weight flexibility in fuzzy DEA , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[88]  Moussa Larbani,et al.  Multiobjective data envelopment analysis , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[89]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  A method for finding common set of weights by multiple objective programming in data envelopment analysis. , 2000 .

[90]  Alireza Davoodi,et al.  Common set of weights in data envelopment analysis: a linear programming problem , 2012, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[91]  Alireza Alinezhad,et al.  Finding common weights based on the DM's preference information , 2011, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[92]  John Semple,et al.  Constrained games for evaluating organizational performance , 1997 .

[93]  Gary R. Reeves,et al.  A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[94]  Jie Wu,et al.  Performance ranking of units considering ideal and anti-ideal DMU with common weights , 2013 .

[95]  Nuria Ramón,et al.  Common sets of weights as summaries of DEA profiles of weights: With an application to the ranking of professional tennis players , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[96]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses , 1994 .

[97]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .