Angiographic analysis of immediate and long‐term results of PTCR vs. PTCA in complex lesions (COBRA study)

We conducted a prospective, randomized trial to compare immediate and long‐term effects of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and high‐frequency rotational atherectomy (PTCR) in patients with angiographically predefined complex coronary artery lesions (AHA type B2 and C). The relation of lesion characteristics to procedural results is reported in this angiographic analysis. Patients were randomly assigned to balloon angioplasty (n = 250 patients) or rotational atherectomy (n = 252 patients). Quantitative coronary angiography could be performed in 447 patients to evaluate immediate results and in 293 patients with a 6‐month angiographic follow‐up. Procedural success was comparable in the PTCR and in the PTCA group (80% vs. 76%, P = 0.260). The need for stent implantation due to a residual stenosis >50% or a bail‐out situation was significantly higher in the PTCA group (9.7% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.001). In both treatment groups, diameter stenosis was effectively reduced and MLD increased. The acute gain did not differ between the two groups. At 6‐month control, the restenosis rate was comparable in the PTCR and in the PTCA group (37% vs. 35%, P = 0.658), whereas diameter stenosis was significantly more severe in the PTCR group than in the PTCA group (52% vs. 46%, P = 0.039) and, correspondingly, the MLD was significantly smaller in the PTCR group (1.29 mm vs. 1.44 mm, P = 0.031). Late loss was about the same in both groups, however, net gain and net gain index were significantly higher in the PTCA group (0.82 mm vs. 0.64 mm, P = 0.008; and 31% vs. 24%, P = 0.009). Analysis of procedural results for various lesion characteristics revealed no significant difference between treatment groups. In this randomized trial, complex coronary artery lesions were treated with comparable results for angiographic and procedural success and the restenosis rate by both, PTCA and PTCR. Late loss, however, was significantly higher and net gain significantly smaller after PTCR. Stents, although infrequently used, had a relevant impact on immediate PTCA results but not on late results. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;53:359–367. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Ulrich Dietz,et al.  Comparison of QCA systems , 1997, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.

[2]  M. Leon,et al.  Comparative early and nine-month results of rotational atherectomy, stents, and the combination of both for calcified lesions in large coronary arteries. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  D. Baim,et al.  Balloon angioplasty versus new device intervention: clinical outcomes. A comparison of the NHLBI PTCA and NACI registries. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  K. Kuck,et al.  The Comparison of Balloon versus Rotational Angioplasty (COBRA) Study Protocol: A Prospective Randomized Study , 1997 .

[5]  F. Schwarz,et al.  Randomized comparison of angioplasty of complex coronary lesions at a single center. Excimer Laser, Rotational Atherectomy, and Balloon Angioplasty Comparison (ERBAC) Study. , 1997, Circulation.

[6]  S. Blankenberg,et al.  [Effect of qualitative stenosis characteristics on the quality of measurements of various QCA systems]. , 1997, Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie.

[7]  U. Dietz,et al.  Einfluß von qualitativen Stenosecharakteristika auf die Meßqualität verschiedener QCA-Systeme , 1997, Zeitschrift für Kardiologie.

[8]  M. Buchbinder,et al.  Comparison of early and recent results with rotational atherectomy. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  A. Yeung,et al.  High-speed rotational atherectomy: six-month serial quantitative coronary angiographic follow-up. , 1996, American heart journal.

[10]  P. Serruys,et al.  Differences in restenosis propensity of devices for transluminal coronary intervention. A quantitative angiographic comparison of balloon angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stent implantation and excimer laser angioplasty. CARPORT, MERCATOR, MARCATOR, PARK, and BENESTENT Trial Groups. , 1995, European heart journal.

[11]  M. Leon,et al.  High speed rotational atherectomy: outcome in calcified and noncalcified coronary artery lesions. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  E. Sowton,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of aorta ostial, non-aorta ostial, and branch ostial stenoses: acute and long-term outcome. , 1995, European heart journal.

[13]  M. Buchbinder,et al.  720-4 Coronary Dissection Following Rotational Atherectomy: Clinical Characteristics, Angiographic Predictors and Acute Outcomes , 1995 .

[14]  E. Topol,et al.  Relation of Clinical Presentation, Stenosis Morphology, and Operator Technique to the Procedural Results of Rotational Atherectomy and Rotational Atherectomy–Facilitated Angioplasty , 1994, Circulation.

[15]  M Siebes,et al.  Variability in measures of coronary lumen dimensions using quantitative coronary angiography. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  K. Barth,et al.  AWOS: angiographic workstation for digital quantitative coronary angiography , 1993, Proceedings of Computers in Cardiology Conference.

[17]  W. O’Neill,et al.  Detailed angiographic analysis of high-speed mechanical rotational atherectomy in human coronary arteries. , 1993, Circulation.

[18]  R. Shaw,et al.  Coronary rotational ablation: initial experience in 302 procedures. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  B. Waller,et al.  Anatomy, histology, and pathology of coronary arteries: A review relevant to new interventional and imaging techniques‐part iv , 1992, Clinical cardiology.

[20]  P. Teirstein,et al.  High speed rotational coronary atherectomy for patients with diffuse coronary artery disease. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  R. Erbel,et al.  [Angiographic and histologic findings in high frequency rotational ablation in coronary arteries in vitro]. , 1991, Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie.

[22]  M. Savage,et al.  Clinical and angiographic determinants of primary coronary angioplasty success , 1991 .

[23]  [Coronary vessel stent implantation in patients with symptomatic dissections following balloon dilatation]. , 1990, Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie.

[24]  R Brennecke,et al.  Analysis of risk factors for restenosis after PTCA. , 1990, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[25]  B. Waller.  "Crackers, breakers, stretchers, drillers, scrapers, shavers, burners, welders and melters"--the future treatment of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease? A clinical-morphologic assessment. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  W S Moore,et al.  Removal of focal atheromatous lesions by angioscopically guided high-speed rotary atherectomy. Preliminary experimental observations. , 1988, Journal of vascular surgery.

[27]  C. J. Kooijman,et al.  Variabilities in measurement of coronary arterial dimensions resulting from variations in cineframe selection. , 1988, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[28]  J. Ritchie,et al.  Rotational atherectomy in atherosclerotic rabbit iliac arteries. , 1988, American heart journal.

[29]  D C Levin,et al.  Significance of the Angiographic Morphology of Localized Coronary Stenoses: Histopathologic Correlations , 1982, Circulation.