Differential MRI analysis for quantification of low grade glioma growth

A differential analysis framework of longitudinal FLAIR MRI volumes is proposed, based on non-linear gray value mapping, to quantify low-grade glioma growth. First, MRI volumes were mapped to a common range of gray levels via a midway-based histogram mapping. This mapping enabled direct comparison of MRI data and computation of difference maps. A statistical analysis framework of intensity distributions in midway-mapped MRI volumes as well as in their difference maps was designed to identify significant difference values, enabling quantification of low-grade glioma growth, around the borders of an initial segmentation. Two sets of parameters, corresponding to optimistic and pessimistic growth estimations, were proposed. The influence and modeling of MRI inhomogeneity field on a novel midway-mapping framework using image models with multiplicative contrast changes was studied. Clinical evaluation was performed on 32 longitudinal clinical cases from 13 patients. Several growth indices were measured and evaluated in terms of accuracy, compared to manual tracing. Results from the clinical evaluation showed that millimetric precision on a specific volumetric radius growth index measurement can be obtained automatically with the proposed differential analysis. The automated optimistic and pessimistic growth estimates behaved as expected, providing upper and lower bounds around the manual growth estimations.

[1]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  An image-driven parameter estimation problem for a reaction–diffusion glioma growth model with mass effects , 2008, Journal of mathematical biology.

[2]  Koenraad Van Leemput,et al.  Automated model-based bias field correction of MR images of the brain , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[4]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  ORBIT: A Multiresolution Framework for Deformable Registration of Brain Tumor Images , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Exploring the discrimination power of the time domain for segmentation and characterization of active lesions in serial MR data , 2000, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  Luc Taillandier,et al.  Inter- and intrapatients comparison of WHO grade II glioma kinetics before and after surgical resection , 2009, Neurosurgical Review.

[7]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  New variants of a method of MRI scale standardization , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Laurent Capelle,et al.  Dynamic history of low‐grade gliomas before and after temozolomide treatment , 2007, Annals of neurology.

[9]  Fabrice Heitz,et al.  Automatic change detection in multimodal serial MRI: application to multiple sclerosis lesion evolution , 2003, NeuroImage.

[10]  Louis Lemieux,et al.  The detection and significance of subtle changes in mixed-signal brain lesions by serial MRI scan matching and spatial normalization , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[11]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Monitoring slowly evolving tumors , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[12]  Luc Taillandier,et al.  Computational modeling of the WHO grade II glioma dynamics: principles and applications to management paradigm , 2008, Neurosurgical Review.

[13]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Mapping hippocampal and ventricular change in Alzheimer disease , 2004, NeuroImage.

[14]  Julie Delon.  Midway Image Equalization , 2004, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[15]  John S. Duncan,et al.  A longitudinal study of brain morphometrics using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and difference image analysis , 2003, NeuroImage.

[16]  J. Britton,et al.  FLAIR imaging in the follow-up of low-grade gliomas: time to dispense with the dual-echo? , 2001, Neuroradiology.

[17]  Laurent Capelle,et al.  Continuous growth of mean tumor diameter in a subset of grade II gliomas , 2003, Annals of neurology.

[18]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Automatic brain tumor segmentation by subject specific modification of atlas priors. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[19]  M. Miller.  Computational anatomy: shape, growth, and atrophy comparison via diffeomorphisms , 2004, NeuroImage.

[20]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  A Review of Methods for Correction of Intensity Inhomogeneity in MRI , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Image Guided Personalization of Reaction-Diffusion Type Tumor Growth Models Using Modified Anisotropic Eikonal Equations , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Henrique S. Malvar,et al.  Signal processing with lapped transforms , 1992 .

[23]  Badrinath Roysam,et al.  Image change detection algorithms: a systematic survey , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[24]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  The NA-MIC Kit: ITK, VTK, pipelines, grids and 3D slicer as an open platform for the medical image computing community , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[25]  Lawrence O. Hall,et al.  Automatic tumor segmentation using knowledge-based techniques , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  Neil A. Thacker,et al.  Non-Parametric Image Subtraction using Grey Level Scattergrams , 2000, BMVC.

[27]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Automatic Detection and Segmentation of Evolving Processes in 3D Medical Images: Application to Multiple Sclerosis , 1999, IPMI.

[28]  Olivier Clatz,et al.  Glioma Dynamics and Computational Models: A Review of Segmentation, Registration, and In Silico Growth Algorithms and their Clinical Applications , 2007 .

[29]  Jonathan Marchini,et al.  Comparing methods of analyzing fMRI statistical parametric maps , 2004, NeuroImage.

[30]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Longitudinal MRI Data: Applications for Detection of Disease Activity in MS , 2002, MICCAI.

[31]  Luc Taillandier,et al.  Prognostic value of initial magnetic resonance imaging growth rates for World Health Organization grade II gliomas , 2006, Annals of neurology.

[32]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Automated segmentation of MR images of brain tumors. , 2001, Radiology.

[33]  Julie Delon,et al.  DETECTION OF GLIOMA EVOLUTION ON LONGITUDINAL MRI STUDIES , 2007, 2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[34]  Dinu Coltuc,et al.  Exact histogram specification , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[35]  Luc Taillandier,et al.  Prognostic significance of imaging contrast enhancement for WHO grade II gliomas. , 2009, Neuro-oncology.

[36]  M. Christian,et al.  [New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors]. , 2000, Bulletin du cancer.

[37]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  CLASSIC: Consistent Longitudinal Alignment and Segmentation for Serial Image Computing , 2006, NeuroImage.

[38]  Olga Ciccarelli,et al.  Low-grade gliomas: six-month tumor growth predicts patient outcome better than admission tumor volume, relative cerebral blood volume, and apparent diffusion coefficient. , 2009, Radiology.

[39]  Julie Delon,et al.  Contrast mapping and statistical testing for low-grade glioma growth quantification on brain MRI , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[40]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[41]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Extrapolating glioma invasion margin in brain magnetic resonance images: Suggesting new irradiation margins , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[42]  Joachim Hornegger,et al.  Nonrigid Registration of Joint Histograms for Intensity Standardization in Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[43]  Dominik S. Meier,et al.  Time-series analysis of MRI intensity patterns in multiple sclerosis , 2003, NeuroImage.

[44]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Realistic simulation of the 3-D growth of brain tumors in MR images coupling diffusion with biomechanical deformation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.