Sentiment Propagation for Predicting Reputation Polarity

One of the core tasks of Online Reputation Monitoring is to determine whether a text mentioning the entity of interest has positive or negative implications for its reputation. A challenging aspect of the task is that many texts are polar facts, i.e. they do not convey sentiment but they do have reputational implications (e.g. A Samsung smartphone exploded during flight has negative implications for the reputation of Samsung). In this paper we explore the hypothesis that, in order to determine the reputation polarity of factual information, we can propagate sentiment from sentiment-bearing texts to factual texts that discuss the same issue. We test two approaches that implement such hypothesis: the first one is to directly propagate sentiment to similar texts, and the second one is to augment the polarity lexicon. Our results (i) confirm our propagation hypothesis, with improvements of up to 43% in weakly supervised settings and up to 59% with fully supervised methods; and (ii) indicate that building domain-specific polarity lexicons is a cost-effective strategy.

[1]  M. de Rijke,et al.  Estimating Reputation Polarity on Microblog Posts , 2016, Inf. Process. Manag..

[2]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[3]  Fabio Crestani,et al.  Like It or Not , 2016, ACM Comput. Surv..

[4]  Saif Mohammad,et al.  Sentiment Analysis of Short Informal Texts , 2014, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[5]  Kenneth Ward Church,et al.  Word Association Norms, Mutual Information, and Lexicography , 1989, ACL.

[6]  Bo Pang,et al.  Thumbs up? Sentiment Classification using Machine Learning Techniques , 2002, EMNLP.

[7]  Peter D. Turney,et al.  Emotions Evoked by Common Words and Phrases: Using Mechanical Turk to Create an Emotion Lexicon , 2010, HLT-NAACL 2010.

[8]  Owen Rambow,et al.  Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Data , 2011 .

[9]  Patricio Martínez-Barco,et al.  DLSI-Volvam at RepLab 2013: Polarity Classification on Twitter Data , 2013, CLEF.

[10]  Julio Gonzalo,et al.  Overview of RepLab 2012: Evaluating Online Reputation Management Systems , 2012, CLEF.

[11]  Fabio Crestani,et al.  Topic-Specific Stylistic Variations for Opinion Retrieval on Twitter , 2016, ECIR.

[12]  Maite Taboada,et al.  Lexicon-Based Methods for Sentiment Analysis , 2011, CL.

[13]  Julio Gonzalo,et al.  Learning similarity functions for topic detection in online reputation monitoring , 2014, SIGIR.

[14]  José Saias,et al.  In Search of Reputation Assessment: Experiences with Polarity Classification in RepLab 2013 , 2013, CLEF.

[15]  Richárd Farkas,et al.  Filtering and Polarity Detection for Reputation Management on Tweets , 2013, CLEF.

[16]  Julio Gonzalo,et al.  Overview of RepLab 2013: Evaluating Online Reputation Monitoring Systems , 2013, CLEF.

[17]  Verónica Pérez-Rosas,et al.  Learning Sentiment Lexicons in Spanish , 2012, LREC.

[18]  Bing Liu,et al.  Mining and summarizing customer reviews , 2004, KDD.

[19]  Fabio Crestani,et al.  Aggregation Methods for Proximity-Based Opinion Retrieval , 2012, TOIS.

[20]  Ana M. García-Serrano,et al.  Modelling Techniques for Twitter Contents: A Step beyond Classification based Approaches , 2013, CLEF.

[21]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Twitter Sentiment Analysis: The Good the Bad and the OMG! , 2011, ICWSM.

[22]  Janyce Wiebe,et al.  Recognizing Contextual Polarity in Phrase-Level Sentiment Analysis , 2005, HLT.

[23]  Patrick Paroubek,et al.  Twitter as a Corpus for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining , 2010, LREC.

[24]  Lillian Lee,et al.  Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis , 2008, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[25]  Peter D. Turney Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down? Semantic Orientation Applied to Unsupervised Classification of Reviews , 2002, ACL.