Using LES in a Discontinuous Galerkin method with constant and dynamic SGS models

The Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method provides numerical solutions of the NavierStokes equations with high order of accuracy in complex geometries and allows for highly efficient parallelization algorithms. These attributes make the DG method highly attractive for large eddy simulation (LES). The main goal of this work is to investigate the feasibility of adopting an explicit filter to the numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations to increase the numerical stability of underresolved simulations such as LES and to use the explicit filter in dynamic subgrid scale (SGS) models for LES. The explicit filter takes advantage of DG’s framework where the solution is approximated using a polynomial basis. The higher modes of the solution correspond to a higher order polynomial basis, therefore by removing high order modes the filtered solution contains only lower frequency content. The explicit filter is successfully used here to remove the effects of aliasing in underresolved simulations of the Taylor-Green vortex case at a Reynolds number Re = 1600. The de-aliasing is achieved by evaluating a solution at a higher order polynomial (effectively increasing the number of quadrature points used for integration) and then projecting the solution down to a lower order polynomial. The SGS models investigated include the constant coefficient Smagorinsky Model (CCSM), Dynamic Smagorinsky Model (DSM), and Dynamic Heinz Model (DHM). The Taylor-Green Vortex case exhibits a laminar-turbulent transition and it is shown that the dynamic SGS models capture this transition more accurately than the CCSM when a sufficiently high polynomial order is used. The explicit test-filter operation for the dynamic models introduces a commutation error. A brief comparison of the effects of the commutative error that exists with this filter implementation is shown although further investigation is needed to determine the more appropriate order of operations.

[1]  P. Lax Weak solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic equations and their numerical computation , 1954 .

[2]  A. Beck,et al.  On the accuracy of high-order discretizations for underresolved turbulence simulations , 2013 .

[3]  George Em Karniadakis,et al.  De-aliasing on non-uniform grids: algorithms and applications , 2003 .

[4]  Harish Gopalan,et al.  Realizable versus non-realizable dynamic subgrid-scale stress models , 2012 .

[5]  Dimitri J. Mavriplis,et al.  Multigrid algorithms for high-order discontinuous Galerkin discretizations of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[6]  Dimitri J. Mavriplis,et al.  An Adaptive Explicit 3D Discontinuous Galerkin Solver for Unsteady Problems , 2015 .

[7]  Ralf Hartmann,et al.  An optimal order interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin discretization of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[8]  E. M. Wahba,et al.  Runge–Kutta time‐stepping schemes with TVD central differencing for the water hammer equations , 2006 .

[9]  L. Quartapelle The incompressible Navier—Stokes equations , 1993 .

[10]  Dimitri J. Mavriplis,et al.  3D Mixed Element Discontinuous Galerkin with Shock Capturing , 2013 .

[11]  A. Jameson,et al.  Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge Kutta time stepping schemes , 1981 .

[12]  Laslo T. Diosady,et al.  Design of a Variational Multiscale Method for Turbulent Compressible Flows , 2013 .

[13]  P. Sagaut,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation for Compressible Flows , 2009 .

[14]  Hugh Maurice Blackburn,et al.  Spectral element filtering techniques for large eddy simulation with dynamic estimation , 2003 .