Efficient Removal Lemmas for Matrices

The authors and Fischer recently proved that any hereditary property of two-dimensional matrices (where the row and column order is not ignored) over a finite alphabet is testable with a constant number of queries, by establishing the following (ordered) matrix removal lemma: For any finite alphabet $\Sigma$, any hereditary property $\mathcal{P}$ of matrices over $\Sigma$, and any $\epsilon > 0$, there exists $f_{\mathcal{P}}(\epsilon)$ such that for any matrix $M$ over $\Sigma$ that is $\epsilon$-far from satisfying $\mathcal{P}$, most of the $f_{\mathcal{P}}(\epsilon) \times f_{\mathcal{P}}(\epsilon)$ submatrices of $M$ do not satisfy $\mathcal{P}$. Here being $\epsilon$-far from $\mathcal{P}$ means that one needs to modify at least an $\epsilon$-fraction of the entries of $M$ to make it satisfy $\mathcal{P}$. However, in the above general removal lemma, $f_{\mathcal{P}}(\epsilon)$ grows very fast as a function of $\epsilon^{-1}$, even when $\mathcal{P}$ is characterized by a single forbidden submatrix. In this work we establish much more efficient removal lemmas for several special cases of the above problem. In particular, we show the following: For any fixed $s \times t$ binary matrix $A$ and any $\epsilon > 0$ there exists $\delta > 0$ polynomial in $\epsilon$, such that for any binary matrix $M$ in which less than a $\delta$-fraction of the $s \times t$ submatrices are equal to $A$, there exists a set of less than an $\epsilon$-fraction of the entries of $M$ that intersects every $A$-copy in $M$. We generalize the work of Alon, Fischer and Newman [SICOMP'07] and make progress towards proving one of their conjectures. The proofs combine their efficient conditional regularity lemma for matrices with additional combinatorial and probabilistic ideas.

[1]  Yuichi Yoshida,et al.  Limits of Ordered Graphs and Images , 2018, ArXiv.

[2]  Noga Alon,et al.  A characterization of easily testable induced subgraphs , 2004, SODA '04.

[3]  Madhu Sudan Invariance in Property Testing , 2010, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[4]  E. Szemerédi Regular Partitions of Graphs , 1975 .

[5]  Noga Alon,et al.  A characterization of the (natural) graph properties testable with one-sided error , 2005, 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'05).

[6]  Noga Alon,et al.  Efficient Testing of Bipartite Graphs for Forbidden Induced Subgraphs , 2007, SIAM J. Comput..

[7]  Eldar Fischer,et al.  Lower bounds for testing forbidden induced substructures in bipartite-graph-like combinatorial objects , 2007, APPROX-RANDOM.

[8]  GoldreichOded,et al.  Property testing and its connection to learning and approximation , 1998 .

[9]  B. Szegedy,et al.  Regularity Partitions and The Topology of Graphons , 2010, 1002.4377.

[10]  Noga Alon,et al.  Easily Testable Graph Properties , 2015, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing.

[11]  David Conlon,et al.  Graph removal lemmas , 2012, Surveys in Combinatorics.

[12]  V. Rödl,et al.  The counting lemma for regular k-uniform hypergraphs , 2006 .

[13]  Vojtech Rödl,et al.  The algorithmic aspects of the regularity lemma , 1992, Proceedings., 33rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[14]  Noga Alon Testing subgraphs in large graphs , 2002, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[15]  W. T. Gowers,et al.  A new proof of Szemerédi's theorem , 2001 .

[16]  Noga Alon,et al.  Efficient Testing of Large Graphs , 2000, Comb..

[17]  Asaf Shapira,et al.  Removal Lemmas with Polynomial Bounds Lior Gishboliner , 2016 .

[18]  Eldar Fischer,et al.  Earthmover Resilience and Testing in Ordered Structures , 2018, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[19]  Daniel Reichman,et al.  Deleting and Testing Forbidden Patterns in Multi-Dimensional Arrays , 2017, ICALP.

[20]  Eldar Fischer,et al.  Testing of matrix-poset properties , 2007, Comb..

[21]  Asaf Shapira,et al.  Removal lemmas with polynomial bounds , 2016, STOC.

[22]  K. K. Nambiar,et al.  Foundations of Computer Science , 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[23]  Dana Ron,et al.  Property testing and its connection to learning and approximation , 1998, JACM.

[24]  F. Behrend On Sets of Integers Which Contain No Three Terms in Arithmetical Progression. , 1946, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Jacob Fox,et al.  A new proof of the graph removal lemma , 2010, ArXiv.

[26]  Ronitt Rubinfeld,et al.  Robust Characterizations of Polynomials with Applications to Program Testing , 1996, SIAM J. Comput..

[27]  Noga Alon,et al.  Testing Hereditary Properties of Ordered Graphs and Matrices , 2017, 2017 IEEE 58th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[28]  Noga Alon,et al.  Regular languages are testable with a constant number of queries , 1999, 40th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.99CB37039).

[29]  Terence Tao A variant of the hypergraph removal lemma , 2006, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A.

[30]  David Conlon,et al.  Bounds for graph regularity and removal lemmas , 2011, ArXiv.

[31]  Jozef Skokan,et al.  Applications of the regularity lemma for uniform hypergraphs , 2006 .