Adaptive management of an environmental watering event to enhance native fish spawning and recruitment

SUMMARY 1. A common goal of many environmental flow regimes is to maintain and ⁄ or enhance the river’s native fish community by increasing the occurrence of successful spawning and recruitment events. However, our understanding of the flow requirements of the early life history of fish is often limited, and hence predicting their response to specific managed flow events is difficult. To overcome this uncertainty requires the use of adaptive management principles in the design, implementation, monitoring and adjustment of environmental flow regimes. 2. The Barmah-Millewa Forest, a large river red gum forest on the Murray River floodplain, south-east Australia, contains a wide variety of ephemeral and permanent aquatic habitats suitable for fish. Flow regulation of the Murray River has significantly altered the natural flood regime of the Forest. In an attempt to alleviate some of the effects of river regulation, the Forest’s water regime is highly managed using a variety of flow control structures and also receives targeted Environmental Water Allocations (EWA). In 2005, the largest environmental flow allocated to date in Australia was delivered at the Forest. 3. This study describes the adaptive management approach employed during the delivery of the 2005 EWA, which successfully achieved multiple ecological goals including enhanced native fish spawning and recruitment. Intensive monitoring of fish spawning and recruitment provided invaluable real-time and ongoing management input for optimising the delivery of environmental water to maximise ecological benefits at BarmahMillewa Forest and other similar wetlands in the Murray-Darling Basin. 4. We discuss possible scenarios for the future application of environmental water and the need for environmental flow events and regimes to be conducted as rigorous, largescale experiments within an adaptive management framework.

[1]  I. Stuart,et al.  Regulated floodplains - a trap for unwary fish , 2008 .

[2]  W. Junk.  The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems , 1989 .

[3]  E. Sabine G. Schreiber,et al.  Adaptive management: a synthesis of current understanding and effective application , 2004 .

[4]  Charles C. Coutant,et al.  A GENERAL PROTOCOL FOR RESTORATION OF REGULATED RIVERS , 1996 .

[5]  James T. Shields.  Experimental Control of Carp Reproduction through Water Drawdowns in Fort Randall Reservoir, South Dakota , 1958 .

[6]  Richard E. Sparks,et al.  Need for Ecosystem Management of Large Rivers and Their Floodplains These phenomenally productive ecosystems produce fish and wildlife and preserve species , 1995 .

[7]  M. Morrison,et al.  Flows for Floodplain Forests: A Successful Riparian Restoration , 2003 .

[8]  A. Arthington,et al.  Flow restoration and protection in Australian rivers , 2003 .

[9]  P. Humphries,et al.  Fish, Flows and Flood Plains: Links between Freshwater Fishes and their Environment in the Murray-Darling River System, Australia , 1999, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[10]  K. Winemiller,et al.  Relationships between hydrology, spatial heterogeneity, and fish recruitment dynamics in a temperate floodplain river , 2008 .

[11]  Alison J. King,et al.  Environmental flow enhances native fish spawning and recruitment in the Murray River, Australia , 2009 .

[12]  P. Moyle,et al.  EFFECTS OF FLOW REGIME ON FISH ASSEMBLAGES IN A REGULATED CALIFORNIA STREAM , 2001 .

[13]  P. Gehrke,et al.  River regulation and fish communities in the Murray-Darling River system, Australia , 1995 .

[14]  A. Arthington,et al.  Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity , 2002, Environmental management.

[15]  A. Arthington,et al.  Predicting the Water Requirements of River Fisheries , 2006 .

[16]  Brian D. Richter,et al.  A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations , 2006 .

[17]  Martin Mallen-Cooper,et al.  Age, growth and non‐flood recruitment of two potamodromous fishes in a large semi‐arid/temperate river system , 2003 .

[18]  R. Naiman,et al.  The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[19]  C. Nilsson,et al.  Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of River Systems in the Northern Third of the World , 1994, Science.

[20]  Klement Tockner,et al.  Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity1 , 1999 .

[21]  D. Baldwin,et al.  Modelling blackwater: Predicting water quality during flooding of lowland river forests , 2007 .

[22]  Brian Richter,et al.  River flows and water wars: emerging science for environmental decision making , 2003 .

[23]  J. Lake,et al.  Rearing experiments with five species of Australian freshwater fishes. I. Inducement to spawning , 1967 .

[24]  D. Faith,et al.  Monitoring Ecological Impacts: Concepts and Practice in Flowing Waters , 2002 .

[25]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[26]  K. Winemiller,et al.  Ecological correlates of fish reproductive activity in floodplain rivers: a life-history-based approach , 2007 .

[27]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  MEETING ECOLOGICAL AND SOCIETAL NEEDS FOR FRESHWATER , 2002 .

[28]  Alison J. King,et al.  Fish recruitment on floodplains: the roles of patterns of flooding and life history characteristics , 2003 .

[29]  A. King,et al.  Effects of flooding on recruitment and dispersal of the southern pygmy perch (Nannoperca australis) at a Murray River floodplain wetland , 2008 .

[30]  A. Arthington,et al.  Freshwater Fishes of North-Eastern Australia , 2004 .

[31]  Neal D. Foster,et al.  Fish assemblages of an Australian dryland river: abundance, assemblage structure and recruitment patterns in the Warrego River, Murray-Darling Basin , 2006 .