A dual frame survey to assess time- and space-related changes of the colonizing wolf population in France

The wolf recovery in France dates back to 1992, following the natural range expansion of the remaining Italian population since the late 1960’s. Facing a high level of interactions between wolves and sheep breeding, decision makers had to quickly balance the need for managing livestock depredations with the conservation of wolves as a protected species. The French authorities therefore required a reliable assessment of changes in the species range and population numbers, as well as a reliable monitoring of depredations on livestock, all being key variables to be further included within the governmental decision making process. Because of their elusive behaviour, high mobility, and territoriality, applying a standard random sampling design to the monitoring of a wolf population would lead to almost no chance of collecting any signs of presence. In order to increase detectability, we use a dual frame survey based on two spatial scales (“population range” and “reproductive unit”) investigated sequentially thanks to a network of specifically-trained wolf experts distributed over 80000 km 2 to collect the data. First, an extensive sign survey at a large scale provides so-called cross-sectional data (pool of signs from unknown individuals for a given year), thereby allowing the detection of new wolf occurrences, new pack formations, and the documentation of geographical trends. Secondly, an intensive sign survey within each detected wolf territory, based on standard snow tracking and wolf howling playback sessions, provides some yearly updatable proxies of the demographic pattern. The combination with a non invasive molecular tracking provides longitudinal data to develop markrecapture models and estimate vital rates, population size and growth rate, while accounting for detection probabilities. The latter are used in turn to control for proxies’ reliability and to implement demographic models with local population parameters. Finally, wolf activity patterns in connection with predator-prey dynamics is investigated through a pilot study carried out with both wolves and four ungulate preys radio-collared. A particular attention is paid to checking the reliability of presence sign data, as well as improving the cost-eciency ratio of the monitoring. Finally, these results

[1]  L. Waits,et al.  Noninvasive genetic sampling: look before you leap. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Capture–recapture population growth rate as a robust tool against detection heterogeneity for population management , 2011 .

[3]  O. Liberg,et al.  Wolf Movement Patterns: a Key to Estimation of Kill Rate? , 2007 .

[4]  I. Herfindal,et al.  An evaluation of structured snow-track surveys to monitor Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx populations , 2007 .

[5]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Tradeoffs of different types of species occurrence data for use in systematic conservation planning. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[6]  Nathaniel Valière Amélioration et optimisation des méthodes non-invasives et des marqueurs microsatellites en biologie des populations et de la conservation , 2002 .

[7]  J. Wiens Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[8]  V. Lucchini,et al.  Evidence of genetic distinction and long‐term population decline in wolves (Canis lupus) in the Italian Apennines , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[9]  Håkan Sand,et al.  Building a mechanistic understanding of predation with GPS-based movement data , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Pierre Taberlet,et al.  Long‐distance wolf recolonization of France and Switzerland inferred from non‐invasive genetic sampling over a period of 10 years , 2003 .

[11]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Noninvasive Survey Methods for Carnivores , 2010 .

[12]  D. Pletscher,et al.  Characteristics of dispersal in a colonizing wolf population in the central Rocky Mountains , 1999 .

[13]  K. Schmidt,et al.  Howling activity of free-ranging wolves (Canis lupus) in the Białowieża Primeval Forest and the Western Beskidy Mountains (Poland) , 2007, Journal of Ethology.

[14]  Jörn Theuerkauf,et al.  Daily movements and territory use by radio-collared wolves (Canis lupus) in Bialowieza Primeval Forest in Poland , 2001 .

[15]  O. Liberg,et al.  Estimating total lynx Lynx lynx population size from censuses of family groups , 2002, Wildlife Biology.

[16]  M. S. Mitchell,et al.  Surveying Predicted Rendezvous Sites to Monitor Gray Wolf Populations , 2010 .

[17]  J. Nichols,et al.  Monitoring carnivore populations at the landscape scale: occupancy modelling of tigers from sign surveys , 2011 .

[18]  Håkan Sand,et al.  Using GPS technology and GIS cluster analyses to estimate kill rates in wolf—ungulate ecosystems , 2005 .

[19]  L. Maiorano,et al.  Long-Distance Dispersal of a Rescued Wolf From the Northern Apennines to the Western Alps , 2009 .

[20]  I. Kojola,et al.  DISPERSAL IN AN EXPANDING WOLF POPULATION IN FINLAND , 2006 .

[21]  Paul Beier,et al.  Power of track surveys to detect changes in cougar populations , 1996 .

[22]  P. Taberlet,et al.  From the Apennines to the Alps: colonization genetics of the naturally expanding Italian wolf (Canis lupus) population , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[23]  M. Apollonio,et al.  Temporal changes of howling in south European wolf packs , 2002 .

[24]  Darryl I. MacKenzie,et al.  WAS IT THERE? DEALING WITH IMPERFECT DETECTION FOR SPECIES PRESENCE/ABSENCE DATA † , 2005 .

[25]  Göran Ericsson,et al.  Monitoring rare or elusive large mammals using effort-corrected voluntary observers , 2009 .

[26]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Importance of Accounting for Detection Heterogeneity When Estimating Abundance: the Case of French Wolves , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[27]  F. Harrington Timber wolf howling playback studies: Discrimination of pup from adult howls , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Quality indexes to assess the reliability of genotypes in studies using noninvasive sampling and multiple‐tube approach , 2006 .

[29]  Eliot J. B. McIntire,et al.  Predicting spatio-temporal recolonization of large carnivore populations and livestock depredation risk: wolves in the Italian Alps , 2010 .

[30]  J. Swenson,et al.  Methods for monitoring European large carnivores-A worldwide review of relevant experience , 2001 .

[31]  R. Swihart,et al.  Estimating Utilization Distributions with Kernel Versus Local Convex Hull Methods , 2011 .

[32]  Christophe Duchamp,et al.  On the effects of grid size and shape when mapping the distribution range of a recolonising wolf (Canis lupus) population , 2011, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[33]  L. Waits,et al.  NONINVASIVE GENETIC SAMPLING TOOLS FOR WILDLIFE BIOLOGISTS: A REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACCURATE DATA COLLECTION , 2005 .

[34]  L. Mech,et al.  An analysis of howling response parameters useful for wolf pack censusing , 1982 .

[35]  Henrik Andrén,et al.  Biomedical Protocols for Free-ranging Brown Bears, Gray Wolves, Wolverines and Lynx Editors , 2007 .

[36]  Jon S. Horne,et al.  Likelihood Cross-Validation Versus Least Squares Cross-Validation for Choosing the Smoothing Parameter in Kernel Home-Range Analysis , 2006 .

[37]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  Large scale wildlife monitoring studies: statistical methods for design and analysis , 2002 .

[38]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  MODELING COUNT DATA OF RARE SPECIES: SOME STATISTICAL ISSUES , 2005 .

[39]  B. Worton Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies , 1989 .

[40]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Using Niche‐Based Models to Improve the Sampling of Rare Species , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[41]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Urine collected in the field as a source of DNA for species and individual identification , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[42]  D. Roux,et al.  Bridging the Science-Management Divide: Moving from Unidirectional Knowledge Transfer to Knowledge Interfacing and Sharing , 2006 .