Using machine-learning and visualisation to facilitate learner interpretation of source material

This paper describes an approach for supporting inquiry learning from source materials, realised and tested through a tool-kit. The approach is optimised for tasks that require a student to make interpretations across sets of resources, where opinions and justifications may be hard to articulate. We adopt a dialogue-based approach to learning whereby the student creates an external representation to reflect their current understanding of the task. This in turn prompts immediate feedback, designed to help the learner to see patterns or irregularities in their current perspective. Through the on-going feedback, the student is encouraged to make incremental changes to achieve a coherent outcome. In this approach, learners are encouraged to generate meaningful responses for themselves, rather than relying on feedback which explicitly provides an answer. This is aimed at prompting deeper processing and understanding of source materials in the context of the given learning goal.

[1]  G. Pask Conversation, cognition and learning: A cybernetic theory and methodology , 1975 .

[2]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology , 1993 .

[3]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[4]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching 2nd Edition: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies , 2002 .

[5]  Bertram C. Bruce,et al.  Using the Web To Support Inquiry-Based Literacy Development. , 2002 .

[6]  R. Mayer Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[7]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  Induction of Decision Trees , 1986, Machine Learning.

[8]  Kevin D. Ashley,et al.  Teaching Case Analysis through Framing: Prospects for an ITS in an ill-defined domain , 2006 .

[9]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Defining "Ill-Defined Domains"; A literature survey. , 2006 .

[10]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[11]  Patrick Jermann,et al.  Designing Integrative Scripts , 2007 .

[12]  Paul Mulholland,et al.  From design to narrative: the development of inquiry-based learning models. , 2008 .

[13]  Tony Fisher,et al.  Web 2.0 technologies for learning at Key Stages 3 and 4:summary report , 2008 .

[14]  Zdenek Zdráhal,et al.  Intelligent Support for Inquiry Learning from Images: A Learning Scenario and Tool , 2009, AIED.

[15]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Toward Modeling and Teaching Legal Case-Based Adaptation with Expert Examples , 2009, ICCBR.

[16]  Rosemary Luckin,et al.  Beyond Web 2.0: mapping the technology landscapes of young learners , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[17]  Paul Mulholland,et al.  How technology resources can be used to represent personal inquiry and support students' understanding of it across contexts , 2011, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..