Value Creation in University-Firm Research Collaborations: A Matching Approach

University-based technological opportunities are often exploited through joint corporate and academic entrepreneurship activities such as university-industry research collaborations. This paper explores the partner attributes that drive the matching of academic scientists and firms involved in these relationships. The paper models the formation of firm-faculty partnership as an endogenous selection process driven by synergy between partners' knowledge-creation capabilities. The main findings indicate that faculty-firm matching is multidimensional: firms and scientists complement each other in publishing capabilities but substitute each other in patenting skills. Furthermore, firms and scientists with specialized knowledge create more value by teaming with more knowledge-diversified partners. The paper contributes to the literature on university-industry knowledge transfer and, more generally, to the literature on alliance formation.

[1]  G. Becker Chapter Title: a Theory of Marriage a Theory of Marriage , 2022 .

[2]  D Blumenthal,et al.  University-industry research relationships in biotechnology: implications for the university. , 1986, Science.

[3]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex , 1986 .

[4]  Dale T. Mortensen,et al.  Matching: Finding a Partner for Life or Otherwise , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  Luigi Orsenigo,et al.  The emergence of biotechnology , 1989 .

[6]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis , 1990 .

[7]  D. Hicks Published Papers, Tacit Competencies and Corporate Management of the Public/Private Character of Knowledge , 1995 .

[8]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[9]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support , 1996 .

[10]  Paula E. Stephan The Economics of Science , 1996 .

[11]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology , 1996 .

[12]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  GEOGRAPHICALLY LOCALIZED KNOWLEDGE: SPILLOVERS OR MARKETS? , 1998 .

[13]  Andrew A. Toole,et al.  Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence , 1999 .

[14]  Qing Wang,et al.  Complexity and the functions of the firm : breadth and depth , 2000 .

[15]  G. Ahuja The duality of collaboration : Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages , 2000 .

[16]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[17]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science as a Map in Technological Search , 2000 .

[18]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .

[19]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[20]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Chitru S. Fernando,et al.  Wanna Dance? How Firms and Underwriters Choose Each Other , 2004 .

[22]  M. Carree,et al.  Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[23]  R. Nelson The market economy, and the scientific commons , 2004 .

[24]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Academic Freedom, Private-Sector Focus, and the Process of Innovation , 2005 .

[25]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  The Determinants of Faculty Patenting Behavior: Demographics or Opportunities? , 2005 .

[26]  Benjamin F. Jones The Burden of Knowledge and the &Apos;Death of the Renaissance Man&Apos;: Is Innovation Getting Harder? , 2005 .

[27]  Morten Sorensen,et al.  How Smart is Smart Money? A Two-Sided Matching Model of Venture Capital , 2006 .

[28]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  When Do Scientists Become Entrepreneurs? The Social Structural Antecedents of Commercial Activity in the Academic Life Sciences1 , 2006, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  Daniel W. Elfenbein,et al.  Publications, Patents, and the Market for University Inventions , 2006 .

[31]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .

[32]  Maryann Feldman,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[33]  Kira Fabrizio Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation , 2009 .

[34]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Estimating the Value of Brand Alliances in Professional Team Sports , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[35]  Will Mitchell,et al.  Complementarity, capabilities, and the boundaries of the firm: the impact of within‐firm and interfirm expertise on concurrent sourcing of complementary components , 2009 .

[36]  Scott Stern,et al.  Is There a Market for Ideas? , 2009 .