Measuring Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury Treatment Trials: Recommendations From the Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Trials Network

Background:Traumatic brain injury (TBI) involves several aspects of a patient's condition, including physical, mental, emotional, cognitive, social, and functional changes. Therefore, a clinical trial with individuals with TBI should consider outcome measures that reflect their global status. Methods:We present the work of the National Institute of Child Health and Development–sponsored Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Trials Network Outcome Measures subcommittee and its choice of outcome measures for a phase III clinical trial of patients with complicated mild to severe TBI. Results:On the basis of theoretical and practical considerations, the subcommittee recommended the adoption of a core of 9 measures that cover 2 different areas of recovery: functional and cognitive. These measures are the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale; the Controlled Oral Word Association Test; the Trail Making Test, Parts A and B; the California Verbal Learning Test–II; the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–III Digit Span subtest; the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–III Processing Speed Index; and the Stroop Color-Word Matching Test, Parts 1 and 2. Conclusions:The statistical methods proposed to analyze these measures using a global test procedure, along with research and methodological and regulatory issues involved with the use of multiple outcomes in a clinical trial, are discussed.

[1]  M. Fioravanti,et al.  Cytidinediphosphocholine (CDP-choline) for cognitive and behavioural disturbances associated with chronic cerebral disorders in the elderly. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[2]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  Effects of Glasgow Outcome Scale misclassification on traumatic brain injury clinical trials. , 2008, Journal of neurotrauma.

[3]  G. Clifton,et al.  Relationship between Glasgow Outcome Scale and neuropsychological measures after brain injury. , 1993, Neurosurgery.

[4]  G Wassmer,et al.  Procedures for two-sample comparisons with multiple endpoints controlling the experimentwise error rate. , 1991, Biometrics.

[5]  D. Delis,et al.  The California verbal learning test , 2016 .

[6]  N R Temkin,et al.  Valproate therapy for prevention of posttraumatic seizures: a randomized trial. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  P. S. Achilles THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CORPORATION. , 1923, Science.

[8]  H. Winn,et al.  Neurobehavioral effects of phenytoin prophylaxis of posttraumatic seizures. , 1991, JAMA.

[9]  M. Rosenthal,et al.  Neuropsychological prediction of psychosocial outcome after traumatic brain injury. , 1997, Applied neuropsychology.

[10]  David M. Murray,et al.  Design and Analysis of Group- Randomized Trials , 1998 .

[11]  T. Nick,et al.  Long‐Term Neuropsychological Outcome After Traumatic Brain Injury , 2001, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[12]  T. Novack,et al.  Neuropsychological Assessment and Employment Outcome After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review , 2002, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[13]  N L Geller,et al.  Use of a global test for multiple outcomes in stroke trials with application to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke t-PA Stroke Trial. , 1996, Stroke.

[14]  R. Reitan Trail Making Test: Manual for Administration and Scoring , 1992 .

[15]  K A Dunn,et al.  Traumatic brain injury in the United States: A public health perspective. , 1999, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[16]  S. Dikmen,et al.  Workers' risk of unemployment after traumatic brain injury: A normed comparison , 2005, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[17]  G. Teasdale,et al.  Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. , 1998, Journal of neurotrauma.

[18]  B. Jennett Outcome after severe head injury , 2005 .

[19]  K. Ragnarsson Traumatic Brain Injury Research Since the 1998 NIH Consensus Conference: Accomplishments and Unmet Goals , 2006, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[20]  Ross Zafonte,et al.  The citicoline brain injury treatment (COBRIT) trial: design and methods. , 2009, Journal of neurotrauma.

[21]  M. Schlossberg The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and Clinical Interpretation. , 1986 .

[22]  H. Winn,et al.  Neuropsychological effects of valproate in traumatic brain injury , 2000, Neurology.

[23]  T. Novack,et al.  The relationship between neuropsychologic function and level of caregiver supervision at 1 year after traumatic brain injury. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  H. Winn,et al.  Employment following traumatic head injuries. , 1994, Archives of neurology.

[25]  G. Teasdale,et al.  Emotional and cognitive consequences of head injury in relation to the Glasgow outcome scale , 2000, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[26]  H. Levin,et al.  Validity and sensitivity to change of the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale in mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. , 2001, Journal of neurotrauma.

[27]  J. Kreutzer,et al.  Neuropsychological characteristics of patients with brain injury: Preliminary findings from a multicenter investigation , 1993 .

[28]  Joan Machamer,et al.  Neuropsychological outcome at 1-year post head injury. , 1995 .

[29]  L. Rapport,et al.  Executive functioning and predictors of falls in the rehabilitation setting. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  R. Reitan,et al.  The Trail Making Test as an initial screening procedure for neuropsychological impairment in older children. , 2004, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[31]  Foss Mv MANAGEMENT OF VIRUS HEPATITIS. , 1964 .

[32]  G. Clifton,et al.  Misclassification and treatment effect on primary outcome measures in clinical trials of severe neurotrauma. , 2002, Journal of neurotrauma.

[33]  A. Benton Contributions to Neuropsychological Assessment: A Clinical Manual , 1983 .

[34]  T. Novack,et al.  Outcome after traumatic brain injury: pathway analysis of contributions from premorbid, injury severity, and recovery variables. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[35]  B. Jennett,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF OUTCOME AFTER SEVERE BRAIN DAMAGE A Practical Scale , 1975, The Lancet.

[36]  H. Levin Treatment of postconcussional symptoms with CDP-choline , 1991, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[37]  Randomised controlled trial of occupational therapy at home: results at 1 year , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[38]  N R Temkin,et al.  A randomized, double-blind study of phenytoin for the prevention of post-traumatic seizures. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[39]  J. Sleigh,et al.  Neuropsychological functioning during the year following severe traumatic brain injury. , 2001, Brain injury.

[40]  T. Lucas,et al.  Magnesium sulfate for neuroprotection after traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial , 2007, The Lancet Neurology.

[41]  J. Sleigh,et al.  Neuropsychological functioning during the year following severe traumatic brain injury , 2001, Brain injury.

[42]  T. Bushnik,et al.  The Center for Outcome Measurement in Brain Injury (COMBI): An Internet Resource You Should Know About , 2000, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[43]  J. Leon-Carrion,et al.  The role of citicholine in neuropsychological training after traumatic brain injury. , 2000, NeuroRehabilitation.

[44]  C. Dodrill A Neuropsychological Battery for Epilepsy , 1978, Epilepsia.

[45]  B Jennett,et al.  Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. , 1975, Lancet.

[46]  R. Vanderploeg,et al.  Verbal Learning and Memory Deficits in Traumatic Brain Injury: Encoding, Consolidation, and Retrieval , 2001, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.