Random Deployment of Wireless Sensor Networks : Power of Second Chance

In a pioneering work, Gupta and Kumar [9] studied the critical transmission range needed for the connectivity of random wireless networks. Their result implies that, given a square region of √ n× √ n, the asymptotic number of random nodes (each with transmission range 1) needed to form a connected network is Θ(n ln n) with high probability. This result has been used as cornerstones in deriving a number of asymptotic bounds for random multi-hop wireless networks, such as network capacity [8, 11, 12, 15]. In this paper we show that the asymptotic number of nodes needed for connectivity can be significantly reduced to Θ(n ln ln n) if we are given a “second chance” to deploy nodes. More generally, under some deployment assumption, if we can randomly deploy nodes in k rounds (for a constant k) and the random deployment of the ith round can utilize the information gathered from the previous i− 1 rounds, we show that the number of nodes needed to provide a connected network with high probability is Θ(n ln n). (See Eq (1) for the definition of ln n.) Similar results hold when we need deploy sensors such that the sensing regions of all sensors cover the region of interest.

[1]  Nitin H. Vaidya,et al.  Capacity of multi-channel wireless networks: impact of number of channels and interfaces , 2005, MobiCom '05.

[2]  Parameswaran Ramanathan,et al.  Sensor deployment strategy for target detection , 2002, WSNA '02.

[3]  Michael Mitzenmacher,et al.  The Power of Two Choices in Randomized Load Balancing , 2001, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst..

[4]  Peng-Jun Wan,et al.  Asymptotic critical transmission radius and critical neighbor number for k-connectivity in wireless ad hoc networks , 2004, MobiHoc '04.

[5]  Anthony Man-Cho So,et al.  Theory of semidefinite programming for Sensor Network Localization , 2005, SODA '05.

[6]  Piyush Gupta,et al.  Critical Power for Asymptotic Connectivity in Wireless Networks , 1999 .

[7]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  On the /spl theta/-coverage and connectivity of large random networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  Rigidity, computation, and randomization in network localization , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[9]  Yinyu Ye,et al.  Semidefinite programming for ad hoc wireless sensor network localization , 2004, Third International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2004. IPSN 2004.

[10]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  RHEINISCH-WESTFÄLISCHE TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE AACHEN , 2001 .

[11]  Peng-Jun Wan,et al.  Coverage by randomly deployed wireless sensor networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[12]  Jie Gao,et al.  Distributed localization using noisy distance and angle information , 2006, MobiHoc '06.

[13]  Shaojie Tang,et al.  Multicast capacity for large scale wireless ad hoc networks , 2007, MobiCom '07.

[14]  Colin McDiarmid,et al.  Surveys in Combinatorics, 1989: On the method of bounded differences , 1989 .

[15]  Paul G. Spirakis,et al.  Tail bounds for occupancy and the satisfiability threshold conjecture , 1994, Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[16]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  Localization in sparse networks using sweeps , 2006, MobiCom '06.

[17]  Valerie King,et al.  Connectivity of Wireless Sensor Networks with Constant Density , 2004, ADHOC-NOW.

[18]  Devdatt Dubhashi Simple Proofs of Occupancy Tail Bounds , 1995 .