Meta-analysis of genome-wide expression patterns associated with behavioral maturation in honey bees

BackgroundThe information from multiple microarray experiments can be integrated in an objective manner via meta-analysis. However, multiple meta-analysis approaches are available and their relative strengths have not been directly compared using experimental data in the context of different gene expression scenarios and studies with different degrees of relationship. This study investigates the complementary advantages of meta-analysis approaches to integrate information across studies, and further mine the transcriptome for genes that are associated with complex processes such as behavioral maturation in honey bees. Behavioral maturation and division of labor in honey bees are related to changes in the expression of hundreds of genes in the brain. The information from various microarray studies comparing the expression of genes at different maturation stages in honey bee brains was integrated using complementary meta-analysis approaches.ResultsComparison of lists of genes with significant differential expression across studies failed to identify genes with consistent patterns of expression that were below the selected significance threshold, or identified genes with significant yet inconsistent patterns. The meta-analytical framework supported the identification of genes with consistent overall expression patterns and eliminated genes that exhibited contradictory expression patterns across studies. Sample-level meta-analysis of normalized gene-expression can detect more differentially expressed genes than the study-level meta-analysis of estimates for genes that were well described by similar model parameter estimates across studies and had small variation across studies. Furthermore, study-level meta-analysis was well suited for genes that exhibit consistent patterns across studies, genes that had substantial variation across studies, and genes that did not conform to the assumptions of the sample-level meta-analysis. Meta-analyses confirmed previously reported genes and helped identify genes (e.g. Tomosyn, Chitinase 5, Adar, Innexin 2, Transferrin 1, Sick, Oatp26F) and Gene Ontology categories (e.g. purine nucleotide binding) not previously associated with maturation in honey bees.ConclusionThis study demonstrated that a combination of meta-analytical approaches best addresses the highly dimensional nature of genome-wide microarray studies. As expected, the integration of gene expression information from microarray studies using meta-analysis enhanced the characterization of the transcriptome of complex biological processes.

[1]  Gene E Robinson,et al.  Genomics and Integrative Analyses of Division of Labor in Honeybee Colonies , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[2]  V. Raymond-Delpech,et al.  Insights into the molecular basis of social behaviour from studies on the honeybee, Apis mellifera , 2008, Invertebrate Neuroscience.

[3]  Paula R Williamson,et al.  Investigating heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta‐analysis of time to event outcomes , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  T. Barrette,et al.  Meta-analysis of microarrays: interstudy validation of gene expression profiles reveals pathway dysregulation in prostate cancer. , 2002, Cancer research.

[5]  Sangsoo Kim,et al.  Combining multiple microarray studies and modeling interstudy variation , 2003, ISMB.

[6]  R. Crozier,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of honey bee behavioral evolution. , 2007, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[7]  G. Lanfranchi,et al.  Defining the gene expression signature of rhabdomyosarcoma by meta-analysis , 2006, BMC Genomics.

[8]  V. Pantesco,et al.  A Meta‐Analysis of Human Embryonic Stem Cells Transcriptome Integrated into a Web‐Based Expression Atlas , 2007, Stem cells.

[9]  James R. Knight,et al.  A Protein Interaction Map of Drosophila melanogaster , 2003, Science.

[10]  M. C. Arias,et al.  Phylogenetic relationships of honey bees (Hymenoptera:Apinae:Apini) inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequence data. , 2005, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[11]  S. Falcon,et al.  Combining Results of Microarray Experiments: A Rank Aggregation Approach , 2006, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[12]  Ruth Etzioni,et al.  Combining Results of Microarray Experiments: A Rank Aggregation Approach , 2006 .

[13]  R. Cooper,et al.  Identifying genetic variation affecting a complex trait in simulated data: a comparison of meta-analysis with pooled data analysis , 2005, BMC Genetics.

[14]  Paul Landais,et al.  Meta-regression detected associations between heterogeneous treatment effects and study-level, but not patient-level, factors. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[15]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[16]  G. Robinson,et al.  Gene Expression Profiles in the Brain Predict Behavior in Individual Honey Bees , 2003, Science.

[17]  Rainer Breitling,et al.  RankProd: a bioconductor package for detecting differentially expressed genes in meta-analysis , 2006, Bioinform..

[18]  Gene E. Robinson,et al.  Genomic dissection of behavioral maturation in the honey bee , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Anna Liu,et al.  Bayesian meta-analysis models for microarray data: a comparative study , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[20]  Gene E Robinson,et al.  Semiparametric approach to characterize unique gene expression trajectories across time , 2006, BMC Genomics.

[21]  Gene E Robinson,et al.  Species differences in brain gene expression profiles associated with adult behavioral maturation in honey bees , 2007, BMC Genomics.

[22]  Robert A. Muenchen,et al.  Help and Documentation , 2010 .

[23]  Pierre R. Bushel,et al.  Assessing Gene Significance from cDNA Microarray Expression Data via Mixed Models , 2001, J. Comput. Biol..

[24]  S. Rodriguez-Zas,et al.  Advancing the understanding of the embryo transcriptome co-regulation using meta-, functional, and gene network analysis tools. , 2008, Reproduction.

[25]  Joaquín Dopazo,et al.  BABELOMICS: a systems biology perspective in the functional annotation of genome-scale experiments , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[26]  X. Cui,et al.  Transformations for cDNA Microarray Data , 2003, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[27]  Eytan Ruppin,et al.  Meta-analysis of gene expression data: a predictor-based approach , 2007, Bioinform..

[28]  Zhe Zhang,et al.  An Introduction to MAMA (Meta-Analysis of MicroArray data) System , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[29]  Peter Regitnig,et al.  Identification and meta‐analysis of a small gene expression signature for the diagnosis of estrogen receptor status in invasive ductal breast cancer , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[30]  G. Robinson,et al.  Behavior and the limits of genomic plasticity: power and replicability in microarray analysis of honeybee brains , 2005, Genes, brain, and behavior.