Effect of salinity on water relations and growth of wheat genotypes with contrasting sodium uptake.

Four wheat genotypes with contrasting degrees of Na+ exclusion were selected to see if low Na+ uptake had an adverse effect on water relations or growth rates during exposure to saline conditions. Plants were grown in supported hydroponics with and without 150 mM NaCl, and sampled for measurements of water relations, biomass, stomatal conductance, and ion accumulation. After 4 weeks exposure to salt, biomass was reduced in all genotypes to a similar extent (about 50%), with the effect of salinity on relative growth rate confined largely to the first week. There was little difference between genotypes in the effect of salinity on water relations, as indicated by their relative water content and estimated turgor. Osmotic adjustment occurred in all genotypes, with one of the low-Na+ genotypes having the greatest adjustment. In the low-Na+ genotypes, osmotic adjustment depended on higher K+ and high organic solute accumulation. Stomatal conductance of all genotypes was reduced by saline conditions, but the reduction was greater in the low-Na+ genotypes. These genotypes also showed a larger fall in the value of carbon isotope discrimination measured in expanding leaves, indicating a greater transpiration efficiency when exposed to saline conditions. Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements failed to indicate damage to photochemical pathways in either high- or low-Na+ genotypes. These data indicate that selecting lines with low Na+ accumulation for the purpose of improving salt tolerance is unlikely to introduce limitations for osmotic adjustment.

[1]  S. Lutts,et al.  Effects of salt stress on growth, mineral nutrition and proline accumulation in relation to osmotic adjustment in rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars differing in salinity resistance , 1996, Plant Growth Regulation.

[2]  J. Dvorak,et al.  Enhancement of the salt tolerance of Triticum turgidum L. by the Kna1 locus transferred from the Triticum aestivum L. chromosome 4D by homoeologous recombination , 1994, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[3]  C. N. Law,et al.  Chromosomal location of a K/Na discrimination character in the D genome of wheat , 1987, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[4]  J. Markwell,et al.  Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter , 2004, Photosynthesis Research.

[5]  R. Munns,et al.  Leaf water status controls day-time but not daily rates of leaf expansion in salt-treated barley , 2000 .

[6]  R. Munns,et al.  Rapid environmental changes that affect leaf water status induce transient surges or pauses in leaf expansion rate , 2000 .

[7]  Neil C. Turner,et al.  Leaf-cutter psychrometers: a cautionary note. , 2000 .

[8]  R. Munns,et al.  Genetic variation for improving the salt tolerance of durum wheat , 2000 .

[9]  S. Schubert,et al.  Salt tolerance of maize (Zea mays L.): the role of sodium exclusion , 1995 .

[10]  R. Munns,et al.  The significance of a two-phase growth response to salinity in wheat and barley , 1995 .

[11]  G. Cramer,et al.  Leaf expansion limits dry matter accumulation of salt-stressed maize , 1994 .

[12]  R. Munns.  Physiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soils: some dogmas and hypotheses , 1993 .

[13]  D. Schachtman,et al.  Variation in Sodium Exclusion and Salt Tolerance in Triticum tauschii , 1991 .

[14]  William J. Davies,et al.  Root Signals and the Regulation of Growth and Development of Plants in Drying Soil , 1991 .

[15]  R. Munns,et al.  Concentrations and Transport of Solutes in Xylem and Phloem along the Leaf Axis of NaCl-treated Hordeum vulgare , 1990 .

[16]  J. Gorham.  Salt Tolerance in the Triticeae: K/Na Discrimination in Synthetic Hexaploid Wheats , 1990 .

[17]  J. Briantais,et al.  The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence , 1989 .

[18]  L. T. Evans,et al.  Growth and development in tall and dwarf isogenic lines of spring wheat , 1988 .

[19]  R. Munns,et al.  Growth and Development in NaCl-Treated Plants. I. Leaf Na+ and Cl- Concentrations Do Not Determine Gas Exchange of Leaf Blades in Barley , 1988 .

[20]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  Carbon isotope discrimination is positively correlated with grain yield and dry matter production in field-grown wheat , 1987 .

[21]  B. Forster,et al.  Salt Tolerance in the Triticeae: The Contribution of the D Genome to Cation Selectivity in Hexaploid Wheat , 1987 .

[22]  R. Munns,et al.  Soil water status affects the stomatal conductance of fully turgid wheat and sunflower leaves , 1986 .

[23]  K. Mccree.  Whole-Plant Carbon Balance During Osmotic Adjustment to Drought and Salinity Stress , 1986 .

[24]  R. Munns,et al.  USE OF CONCENTRATED MACRONUTRIENT SOLUTIONS TO SEPARATE OSMOTIC FROM NACL-SPECIFIC EFFECTS ON PLANT-GROWTH , 1986 .

[25]  T. Flowers,et al.  Salinity Resistance in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) And a Pyramiding Approach to Breeding Varieties for Saline Soils , 1986 .

[26]  O. Wolf,et al.  Na+-dependent net K+ Retranslocation in Leaves of Hordeum yulgare, cv. California Mariout and Hordeum distichon, cv. Villa under Salt Stress , 1985 .

[27]  J. Raven.  TANSLEY REVIEW No. 2: REGULATION OF PH AND GENERATION OF OSMOLARITY IN VASCULAR PLANTS: A COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS IN RELATION TO EFFICIENCY OF USE OF ENERGY, NITROGEN AND WATER. , 1985, The New phytologist.

[28]  R. Munns,et al.  Shoot Turgor Does Not Limit Shoot Growth of NaCl-Affected Wheat and Barley. , 1985, Plant physiology.

[29]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Isotopic Composition of Plant Carbon Correlates With Water-Use Efficiency of Wheat Genotypes , 1984 .

[30]  R. Munns,et al.  Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. , 1980 .

[31]  P. Troke,et al.  THE MECHANISM OF SALT TOLERANCE IN HALOPHYTES , 1977 .