Environmental Design Guidelines for Circular Building Components: The Case of the Circular Building Structure

Transitioning to a circular built environment can reduce the environmental impacts, resource consumption and waste generation emanating from buildings. However, there are many options to design circular building components, and limited knowledge on which options lead to the best environmental performance. Few guidelines exist and they build on conventional environmental performance assessments that focus on single life cycles, whereas the circular economy (CE) focuses on a sequence of multiple use- and life cycles. In this article, environmental design guidelines for circular building components were developed in five steps. First, examples of circular variants of a building structure were synthesized. Second, the environmental performance of these variants was compared with a business-as-usual variant through Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) and Material Flow Analysis (MFA) respectively. Circular parameters of these variants were tested using a scenario-specific approach. Third, from 24 LCAs and MFAs, a scorecard, rules-of-thumb and nine environmental design guidelines for designing circular building components were developed that provide guidance on which circular pathways and variants lead to the best environmental performance. For components with a long functional–technical lifespan, the following are promoted: resource efficiency, longer use through adaptable design, low-impact biomaterials and facilitating multiple cycles after and of use. Fourth, the design guidelines were evaluated by 49 experts from academia, industry and government in seven expert sessions. Further research is needed to validate the generalizability of the design guidelines. However, this research makes an important step in supporting the development of circular building components and, subsequently, the transition to a circular built environment.

[1]  T. M. Leung,et al.  Evaluation of the impacts of end-of-life management strategies for deconstruction of a high-rise concrete framed office building , 2017 .

[2]  Fenna Blomsma,et al.  Exploring Circular Strategy Combinations - towards Understanding the Role of PSS , 2018 .

[3]  Renee Wever,et al.  Realizing Product‐Packaging Combinations in Circular Systems: Shaping the Research Agenda , 2017 .

[4]  Morten Birkved,et al.  Development of a Life Cycle Assessment Allocation Approach for Circular Economy in the Built Environment , 2020, Sustainability.

[5]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions , 2017 .

[6]  Lorena M. Fortuna,et al.  Deconstruction of wood-framed houses: Material recovery and environmental impact , 2015 .

[7]  Rob Marsh,et al.  LCA profiles for building components: strategies for the early design process , 2016 .

[8]  N. J. Habraken,et al.  Supports, an alternative to mass housing , 1972 .

[9]  W. Vermeulen,et al.  The circular economy: New or Refurbished as CE 3.0? — Exploring Controversies in the Conceptualization of the Circular Economy through a Focus on History and Resource Value Retention Options , 2017, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[10]  Morten Birkved,et al.  Comparing life cycle assessment modelling of linear vs. circular building components , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[11]  Michael Russell,et al.  Drawing on Education: Using Student Drawings To Promote Middle School Improvement. , 1998 .

[12]  M. Birkved,et al.  Building design and construction strategies for a circular economy , 2020, Architectural Engineering and Design Management.

[13]  Francesco Pomponi,et al.  Embodied carbon mitigation and reduction in the built environment - What does the evidence say? , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[14]  C. Andersen,et al.  Comparison of GHG emissions from circular and conventional building components , 2020 .

[15]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Tracking Construction Material over Space and Time: Prospective and Geo‐referenced Modeling of Building Stocks and Construction Material Flows , 2019 .

[16]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment , 2014, Science.

[17]  N. Bocken,et al.  Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy , 2016 .

[18]  Alejandro Gallego-Schmid,et al.  Links between circular economy and climate change mitigation in the built environment , 2020 .

[19]  Leonora Charlotte Malabi Eberhardt,et al.  Circular Economy potential within the building stock - Mapping the embodied greenhouse gas emissions of four Danish examples , 2021, Journal of Building Engineering.

[20]  Anne van Stijn,et al.  Towards a circular built environment , 2019 .

[21]  S. Olsen,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment - Theory and Practice , 2018 .

[22]  Niklaus Kohler,et al.  From the design of green buildings to resilience management of building stocks , 2018 .

[23]  V. Molina-Moreno,et al.  What Gets Measured, Gets Done: Development of a Circular Economy Measurement Scale for Building Industry , 2018, Sustainability.

[24]  E. Hultink,et al.  The Circular Economy - A New Sustainability Paradigm? , 2017 .

[25]  Tim Cooper,et al.  Circular Product Design. A Multiple Loops Life Cycle Design Approach for the Circular Economy , 2017 .

[26]  Richard Gruner,et al.  Strategies for Applying the Circular Economy to Prefabricated Buildings , 2018, Buildings.

[27]  Danielle Densley Tingley,et al.  Barriers and drivers in a circular economy: the case of the built environment , 2019, Procedia CIRP.

[28]  K. Xing,et al.  Toward a Resource‐Efficient Built Environment: A Literature Review and Conceptual Model , 2017 .

[29]  Thomas Lützkendorf,et al.  Using a budget approach for decision-support in the design process , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[31]  Griet Verbeeck,et al.  Requirements for applying LCA-based environmental impact assessment tools in the early stages of building design , 2018 .

[32]  Carl T. Haas,et al.  Capital project planning for a circular economy , 2018 .

[33]  Alice Moncaster,et al.  Circular Economy Research in the Built Environment: A Theoretical Contribution , 2016 .

[34]  R. J. Geldermans Design for Change and Circularity – Accommodating Circular Material & Product Flows in Construction , 2016 .

[35]  Paris A. Fokaides,et al.  Policy trends for the sustainability assessment of construction materials: A review , 2017 .

[36]  Niki Bey,et al.  Tracing the environmental impact origin within the existing building portfolio of prevailing building typologies , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[37]  Leonora Charlotte Malabi Eberhardt,et al.  Design guidelines for circular building components based on LCA and MFA: The case of the Circular Kitchen , 2020, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[38]  Alexander Dahlsrud How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions , 2008 .

[39]  Francesco Pomponi,et al.  Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practice , 2017 .

[40]  Alice Moncaster,et al.  Design and construction strategies for reducing embodied impacts from buildings – Case study analysis , 2018 .

[41]  Erik Brandt,et al.  Levetider af bygningsdele ved vurdering af bæredygtighed og totaløkonomi , 2013 .

[42]  Carl T. Haas,et al.  A novel selective disassembly sequence planning method for adaptive reuse of buildings , 2018 .

[43]  Ben Amor,et al.  Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review , 2017 .