Smart Control of Imperfect Electromechanical Systems

The concept of imperfection is always associated to a negative outlook. However, real devices are always imperfect and operate far from ideality. Despite this, real devices actually work. This is due to the fact that imperfections give rise to hidden dynamics, which can be excited to gain a positive effect on the overall behavior of the device. Human-machine systems are relevant examples of imperfect systems in which the presence of imperfections plays a crucial role, either negative or positive. In this paper, we focus on a paradigmatic example of imperfect systems, represented by a complex and imperfect electromechanical structure which supports and couples 15 coils rotating thanks to the electromagnetic interaction with associated magnets. The electrical and mechanical interaction between the coils and that between the coils and the structure generate complex patterns of vibration which may prevent the system from reaching the correct working conditions, i.e., all coils actually rotating. A control strategy to ensure coils rotation based on the excitation of the hidden dynamics induced by imperfections is discussed, characterizing its effect with respect to the control signal properties and to the power provided to the structure. It is worth to notice that the control strategy is essentially based on the excitation rather than on the suppression of the hidden dynamics, thus providing evidence on the possibility to control imperfect systems exploiting imperfections.

[1]  W. Ditto,et al.  Taming spatiotemporal chaos with disorder , 1995, Nature.

[2]  Giovanni Muscato,et al.  Chaos Does Help Motion Control , 2007, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[3]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Effects of Imperfect Automation on Decision Making in a Simulated Command and Control Task , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[4]  David D. Woods,et al.  Cognitive Technologies: The Design of Joint Human-Machine Cognitive Systems , 1986, AI Mag..

[5]  Xiaoping Chen,et al.  Interpreting and extracting open knowledge for human-robot interaction , 2017, IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica.

[6]  Semyon M. Meerkov,et al.  Closed loop vibrational control: state and output feedback stabilizability , 1991, [1991] Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[7]  Yildirim Hurmuzlu,et al.  The mechanical systems design handbook : modeling, measurement, and control , 2001 .

[8]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Transitioning to Future Air Traffic Management: Effects of Imperfect Automation on Controller Attention and Performance , 2010, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Carlo Famoso,et al.  Passive and Active Vibrations Allow Self-Organization in Large-Scale Electromechanical Systems , 2016, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[10]  Carlo Famoso,et al.  Control of Imperfect Nonlinear Electromechanical Large Scale Systems: From Dynamics to Hardware Implementation , 2017 .

[11]  Ilene J. Busch‐Vishniac,et al.  Electromechanical sensors and actuators , 1998 .

[12]  Min Wu,et al.  A facial expression emotion recognition based human-robot interaction system , 2017, IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica.

[13]  Young-Jai Park,et al.  Chaotic behaviors of operational amplifiers. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  Lester R. Moskowitz,et al.  Permanent magnet design and application handbook , 1976 .