Antibiotic-Responsive Bioart: Exploring DIYbio as a Design Studio Practice

Our work links hybrid practices from biology, fine arts, and design in a studio setting to support materially-oriented engagement with biotechnology. Using autoethnographic methods, we present our two-year process of converting an HCI studio into a BSL-1 (biosafety level 1) facility, our iterative development of low-cost tools, and our own self-reflexive experimentation with (DIY)bio protocols. Insights from this work led us to design a weeklong bioart course, whereby junior highschool students creatively "painted" with bacteria and antibiotic substances, digitally designed stencils from the resulting petri dish images, and screenprinted them onto physical artifacts. Our findings reveal the nuances of working with biological, analog, and digital materials in a design studio setting. We conclude by reflecting on DIYbio studio as a gathering of diverse actors who work with hybrid materials to give physical form to matters of concern.

[1]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  xPrint: A Modularized Liquid Printer for Smart Materials Deposition , 2016, CHI.

[2]  A. Bauer,et al.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. , 1966, American journal of clinical pathology.

[3]  Mackenzie Wark,et al.  A Hacker Manifesto , 2004 .

[4]  Christopher D. Hundhausen,et al.  An Empirical Study of the “Prototype Walkthrough”: A Studio-Based Activity for HCI Education , 2012, TCHI.

[5]  Orit Shaer,et al.  SynFlo: A Tangible Museum Exhibit for Exploring Bio-Design , 2016, TEI.

[6]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Autobiographical design: what you can learn from designing for yourself , 2012, INTR.

[7]  Paulo Blikstein,et al.  Trap it!: A Playful Human-Biology Interaction for a Museum Installation , 2015, CHI.

[8]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Rudiments 1, 2 & 3: design speculations on autonomy , 2010, TEI.

[9]  John A. Kembel,et al.  Infotropism: living and robotic plants as interactive displays , 2004, DIS '04.

[10]  Michael Eisenberg,et al.  Tangible ideas for children: materials sciences as the future of educational technology , 2004, IDC '04.

[11]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Emerging sites of HCI innovation: hackerspaces, hardware startups & incubators , 2014, CHI.

[12]  Linda Candy,et al.  Designing for creative engagement , 2008 .

[13]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Transformative Appetite: Shape-Changing Food Transforms from 2D to 3D by Water Interaction through Cooking , 2017, CHI.

[14]  Christa S. C. Asterhan,et al.  Socializing Intelligence Through Academic Talk and Dialogue , 2015 .

[15]  Wim van Eck,et al.  Hybrid Biological-Digital Systems in Artistic and Entertainment Computing , 2013, Leonardo.

[16]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 1999 .

[17]  Daniel P. Siewiorek,et al.  Breaking boundaries: strategies for mentoring through textile computing workshops , 2011, CHI.

[18]  Junaid Kashir,et al.  Biology is technology: the promise, peril, and new business of engineering life , 2012 .

[19]  Burak Dura,et al.  Design, engineering and utility of biotic games. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[20]  Kevin Crowley,et al.  Making Sense of Making : Defining Learning Practices in MAKE Magazine , 2016 .

[21]  Nina Parker,et al.  15.6 Testing the Effectiveness of Antimicrobials , 2018 .

[22]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Some variations on a counterfunctional digital camera , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[23]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Organic Primitives: Synthesis and Design of pH-Reactive Materials using Molecular I/O for Sensing, Actuation, and Interaction , 2016, CHI.

[24]  Sarah A. Douglas,et al.  Promoting creativity in the computer science design studio , 2011, SIGCSE '11.

[25]  Asta Roseway,et al.  EarthTones: Chemical Sensing Powders to Detect and Display Environmental Hazards through Color Variation , 2017, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[26]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Autobiographical Design in the Home , 2015 .

[27]  Tracee Vetting Wolf,et al.  Supporting design studio culture in HCI , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[28]  S. Greenberg,et al.  The Psychology of Everyday Things , 2012 .

[29]  Dilafruz R. Williams Book Review of, Design, Make, Play: Growing the Next Generation of STEM Innovators , 2015 .

[30]  M. Chi,et al.  Dialogue Patterns in Peer Collaboration That Promote Learning , 2015 .

[31]  Ingmar H. Riedel-Kruse,et al.  Tangible Interactive Microbiology for Informal Science Education , 2015, TEI.

[32]  Tobie Kerridge,et al.  Threshold devices: looking out from the home , 2008, CHI.

[33]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  At the seams: DIYbio and opportunities for HCI , 2012, DIS '12.

[34]  R. Ascott,et al.  Telematic Embrace: Visionary Theories of Art, Technology, and Consciousness , 2003 .

[35]  Matt Ratto,et al.  Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life , 2011, Inf. Soc..

[36]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  BacToMars: Creative Engagement with Bio-Design for Children , 2017, IDC.

[37]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Nurturing natural sensors , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[38]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  HCI and the arts: a conflicted convergence? , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[39]  Philip Bell,et al.  Discovering and Supporting Successful Learning Pathways of Youth In and Out of School: Accounting for the Development of Everyday Expertise Across Settings , 2013 .

[40]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Studying and Designing Technology for Domestic Life: Lessons from Home , 2014 .

[41]  Daniel Fallman Why Research-Oriented Design Isn’t Design-Oriented Research: On the Tensions Between Design and Research in an Implicit Design Discipline , 2007 .

[42]  Eli Blevis,et al.  The Iterative Design of a Virtual Design Studio , 2008 .

[43]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming , 2013 .

[44]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  Machine intelligence , 2009, CHI.

[45]  Breanne K. Litts,et al.  Learning in the Making: A Comparative Case Study of Three Makerspaces. , 2014 .

[46]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  bioLogic: Natto Cells as Nanoactuators for Shape Changing Interfaces , 2015, CHI.

[47]  T. Ingold Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture , 2013 .

[48]  Orit Shaer,et al.  BacPack: Exploring the Role of Tangibles in a Museum Exhibit for Bio-Design , 2017, TEI.

[49]  W. Emmett Barkley,et al.  Biosafety in microbiological and biomedical laboratories , 1984 .

[50]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Legitimacy, boundary objects & participation in transnational DIY biology , 2016, PDC.

[51]  Colin M. Gray,et al.  Advancing UX Education: A Model for Integrated Studio Pedagogy , 2017, CHI.

[52]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Supporting Cultures of Making: Technology, Policy, Visions, and Myths , 2017, CHI.

[53]  Anne West,et al.  Understanding information practices of interactive personal genomics users , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[54]  Tom Jenkins,et al.  Making public things: how HCI design can express matters of concern , 2014, CHI.

[55]  Andrew Quitmeyer,et al.  Wearable studio practice: design considerations for digital crafting in harsh environments , 2015, UbiComp/ISWC Adjunct.

[56]  Sarah Kuhn,et al.  Learning from the architecture studio: implications for project-based pedagogy , 2001 .

[57]  J. Overhage,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[58]  Stacey Kuznetsov,et al.  Practicing DIYBiology In An HCI Setting , 2016, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[59]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Seamful interweaving: heterogeneity in the theory and design of interactive systems , 2004, DIS '04.

[60]  Foad Hamidi,et al.  Engaging Children Using a Digital Living Media System , 2017, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[61]  Akira Wakita,et al.  PlantDisplay: turning houseplants into ambient display , 2006, ACE '06.

[62]  Thomas A. Dutton,et al.  The Design Studio: An Exploration of its Traditions and Potential , 1989 .

[63]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  At the interface of biology and computation , 2013, CHI.