Residual complaints of patients two years after severe head injury.

In a follow up study of 57 patients who had sustained a severe closed head injury, 84% still reported some residual deficit in their psychological functioning after two years, with forgetfulness being the most common complaint. Expressing the severity of the injury in terms of both the duration of post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) and the extent to which previous work could be resumed (RTW), principal components analyses showed that the occurrence of "impairment complaints"--viz forgetfulness, slowness, poor concentration and inability to divide attention over two simultaneous activities--was positively related to severity. The other complaints, which in the main could be labelled as "intolerances" were not. The same pattern was found when the analyses were based on deficits of the patients as they were reported by relatives. Severity was not appreciably related to the total number of complaints. The correlation between PTA and RTW was 0.52, indicating that with longer PTA duration, work is likely to be resumed at a lower level, or not at all. Though Russell's cut-off of one week PTA to differentiate between severe and very severe concussion appeared useful, in the present study a further cut-off point at the unlucky number of 13 days was considered.

[1]  A. Wyler,et al.  The behavioral sequelae of head injury. , 1983, Journal of clinical neuropsychology.

[2]  M. Bond,et al.  Post-concussional symptoms, financial compensation and outcome of severe blunt head injury. , 1983, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[3]  N. Brooks Reaction Time and Attention after Closed Head Injury , 1982 .

[4]  D N Brooks,et al.  The short-term outcome of severe blunt head injury as reported by relatives of the injured persons. , 1981, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[5]  M. Oddy,et al.  Subjective impairment and social recovery after closed head injury. , 1978, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[6]  B. Deelman,et al.  Long-term recovery of visual reaction time after closed head injury. , 1978, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[7]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Memory Function After Closed Head Injury: A Review of the Quantitative Research , 1977, Cortex.

[8]  W. Rutherford,et al.  SEQUELÆ OF CONCUSSION CAUSED BY MINOR HEAD INJURIES , 1977, The Lancet.

[9]  F. Newcombe,et al.  The psychological effects of concussion D. M. A. Gronwall & H. Sampson, Auckland University Press/Oxford University Press (1974). 118 pp , 1976, Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Kelly The post-traumatic syndrome: an iatrogenic disease. , 1975, Forensic science.

[11]  T. Berge Difficulty Factors, Distribution Effects, and the Least Squares Simplex Data Matrix Solution , 1972 .

[12]  E. Miller,et al.  Simple and choice reaction time following severe head injury. , 1970, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[13]  E. Borgatta Difficulty factors and the use of r-phi. , 1965, The Journal of general psychology.

[14]  H. Miller Accident Neurosis* , 1961, British medical journal.

[15]  R. Sitgreaves Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[16]  H. Merskey,et al.  Psychiatric sequelae of minor head injury. , 1972, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  W. Russell,et al.  The traumatic amnesias. , 1968, International journal of neurology.