Surface Charge Measurement of SonoVue, Definity and Optison: A Comparison of Laser Doppler Electrophoresis and Micro-Electrophoresis.

Microbubble (MB) contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is a promising tool for targeted molecular imaging. It is important to determine the MB surface charge accurately as it affects the MB interactions with cell membranes. In this article, we report the surface charge measurement of SonoVue, Definity and Optison. We compare the performance of the widely used laser Doppler electrophoresis with an in-house micro-electrophoresis system. By optically tracking MB electrophoretic velocity in a microchannel, we determined the zeta potentials of MB samples. Using micro-electrophoresis, we obtained zeta potential values for SonoVue, Definity and Optison of -28.3, -4.2 and -9.5 mV, with relative standard deviations of 5%, 48% and 8%, respectively. In comparison, laser Doppler electrophoresis gave -8.7, +0.7 and +15.8 mV with relative standard deviations of 330%, 29,000% and 130%, respectively. We found that the reliability of laser Doppler electrophoresis is compromised by MB buoyancy. Micro-electrophoresis determined zeta potential values with a 10-fold improvement in relative standard deviation.

[1]  F. Booth Theory of Electrokinetic Effects , 1948, Nature.

[2]  Mooyoung Han,et al.  Zeta potential measurement of bubbles in DAF process and its effect on the removal efficiency , 1998 .

[3]  G. Jameson,et al.  A method for measuring the charge on small gas bubbles , 1978 .

[4]  R. Yoon,et al.  Zeta-potential measurements on microbubbles generated using various surfactants , 1986 .

[5]  H. Ohshima,et al.  Electrophoretic mobility of colloidal gold particles in electrolyte solutions. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[6]  John C. Berg,et al.  An Introduction to Interfaces & Colloids: The Bridge to Nanoscience , 2009 .

[7]  N. Nanda,et al.  Contrast echocardiography: new agents. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  O. Siggaard‐Andersen,et al.  Ionic binding, net charge, and Donnan effect of human serum albumin as a function of pH. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[9]  J. Rubio,et al.  Zeta potential of single and polymer-coated microbubbles using an adapted microelectrophoresis technique , 2011 .

[10]  Joseph V. Hajnal,et al.  Evaluation of Methods for Sizing and Counting of Ultrasound Contrast Agents , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated vascular gene transfection by cavitation of endothelial-targeted cationic microbubbles. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[12]  Jonathan Loughran,et al.  On sizing and counting of microbubbles using optical microscopy. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  F. Villanueva Getting good vibes: the therapeutic power of microbubbles and ultrasound. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[14]  Chih-Kuang Yeh,et al.  Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents for diagnostic and therapeutic applications: current status and future design. , 2012, Chang Gung medical journal.

[15]  S. Kaul,et al.  Influence of microbubble surface charge on capillary transit and myocardial contrast enhancement. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.