INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF DRIVER DISTRACTION

The MUARC advanced car driving simulator was used to undertake a study that examined the effects of distraction upon driving performance for drivers in three age groups. There were two in-car distractors: operating the car audio system and conducting a simulated hands-free mobile phone conversation. The study employed a hazard perception task, whereby the effects of distraction were assessed in terms of drivers' reactions to pedestrians and other hazards in the roadway. Older drivers (over 60) drove more slowly when they were distracted by the audio system and in the complex driving environment. Younger people (18-25) maintained a more constant speed compared to middle aged (30-45) and older drivers (over 60). Fatigue caused by loss of sleep the night before the test, or by the driving task itself, did not affect driver performance. The authors concluded that the in-vehicle tasks of interacting with the audio system and conducting a simulated hands-free mobile phone conversation do impair several aspects of driving performance. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E210298.

[1]  Eric Rodgman,et al.  The role of driver distraction in traffic crashes , 2001 .

[2]  Tim Horberry,et al.  Drivers' use of hand-held mobile phones in Western Australia , 2001 .

[3]  James W. Jenness,et al.  Voice-Activated Dialing or Eating a Cheeseburger: Which is More Distracting during Simulated Driving? , 2002 .

[4]  Talib Rothengatter,et al.  Maintaining task set under fatigue: A study of time-on-task effects in simulated driving. , 2001 .

[5]  D. J. Mascord,et al.  Behavioral and physiological indices of fatigue in a visual tracking task , 1992 .

[6]  Thomas J Triggs,et al.  Simulator-based evaluation of the DriveSmart novice driver CD-ROM training product , 2000 .

[7]  P A Desmond,et al.  Implications of task-induced fatigue effects for in-vehicle countermeasures to driver fatigue. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  H Summala,et al.  Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  J. Horne,et al.  Sleep related vehicle accidents , 1995, BMJ.

[10]  Terry C. Lansdown,et al.  Visual demand and the introduction of advanced driver information systems into road vehicles , 1996 .

[11]  Thomas J Triggs,et al.  Driving simulator validation for speed research. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Michael J. Goodman,et al.  The role of driver inattention in crashes: new statistics from the 1995 crashworthiness data system , 1996 .

[13]  K A Brookhuis,et al.  The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  C. Wickens Engineering psychology and human performance, 2nd ed. , 1992 .

[15]  Paul Green,et al.  Car Phone Usability: A Human Factors Laboratory Test , 1993 .

[16]  David J. Wheatley,et al.  Using Driver Performance Measures to Estimate Workload , 2002 .

[17]  Timothy L. Brown,et al.  Speech-Based Interaction with In-Vehicle Computers: The Effect of Speech-Based E-Mail on Drivers' Attention to the Roadway , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[18]  D. de Waard,et al.  The use of psychophysiology to assess driver status. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[19]  T. M. Nelson,et al.  Development of fatigue symptoms during simulated driving. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  A. Craig,et al.  A critical review of the psychophysiology of driver fatigue , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[21]  Charles T. Scialfa,et al.  Age differences in feature and conjunction search: Implications for theories of visual search and generalized slowing , 1997 .

[22]  Reates Curry,et al.  AN ALTERNATE METHOD TO EVALUATE DRIVER DISTRACTION , 2002 .

[23]  T Boersema,et al.  The influence of advertisements on the conspicuity of routing information. , 1985, Applied ergonomics.

[24]  Claes Tingvall,et al.  INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS: SAFETY AND HUMAN FACTORS ISSUES , 2001 .

[25]  Stephen H. Fairclough,et al.  Impairment of Driving Performance Caused by Sleep Deprivation or Alcohol: A Comparative Study , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[26]  Tim Horberry,et al.  FAtigue Detection TEchnologies for Trucks and Commercial Vehicles: Possibilities and Pitfalls , 2001 .

[27]  Jeff K. Caird,et al.  Visual Search for Traffic Signs: The Effects of Clutter, Luminance, and Aging , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[28]  Timothy John Horberry,et al.  Bridge strike reduction: the design and evaluation of visual warnings , 1999 .

[29]  H Alm,et al.  The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[30]  Thomas J Triggs,et al.  Driving simulator validation for speeding countermeasures research , 1997 .

[31]  Jacques Bergeron,et al.  Monotony of road environment and driver fatigue: a simulator study. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[32]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[33]  A M Feyer,et al.  The impact of work practices on fatigue in long distance truck drivers. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[34]  Ernest J. McCormick,et al.  Human Factors Engineering , 1985 .

[35]  Linda Angell,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF AN ANALOG VERSUS DIGITAL SPEEDOMETER ON DRIVER PERFORMANCE IN A TASK ENVIRONMENT SIMILAR TO DRIVING , 1993 .