Simulation investigations of the coordinated traffic-responsive signal control strategy TUC with actuation at the local junction level

PurposeTUC (Traffic-responsive Urban Control), a strategy aiming at providing coordinated traffic-responsive signal control in large-scale urban networks, has demonstrated high efficiency, especially under saturated conditions. Nevertheless, as TUC adopts common cycle times for all junctions at any time, some green time waste may occur at links with low or strongly varying alternative demand, which could be mitigated by enabling local actuation. It is the aim of this paper to investigate potential benefits to TUC performance emerging from such local actuation.MethodsActuation may be performed in various ways: by relocating unused green time to stages serving high demand; or by preserving TUC-ordered offsets; or by combining as much as possible both of these features. To study and compare the performance and efficiency of these alternative ways to actuation under realistic traffic conditions, the AIMSUN microscopic simulation model of the road network of the city center of Chania, Greece, was used.ResultsSimulation investigations indicated relocating unused green time to stages serving high demand as the most promising way towards a TUC-coordinated locally-actuated control scheme. However, improvements over the TUC strategy by adopting this approach to actuation were moderate.ConclusionAs the simulation results may be due to the signal control setup at the particular network under study and/or the examined demand scenarios, further investigations, including tests with other road networks and/or demand patterns are necessary before reaching any final conclusions concerning the best way to locally actuate the TUC-decided signal control plans.

[1]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Extensions and New Applications of the Traffic-Responsive Urban Control Strategy: Coordinated Signal Control for Urban Networks , 2003 .

[2]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Cost Effective Real-Time Traffic Signal Control Using the TUC Strategy , 2010, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[3]  Franklin Farell Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area: Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system , 2014 .

[4]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Integrated Traffic-Responsive Urban Corridor Control Strategy in Glasgow, Scotland: Application and Evaluation , 2000 .

[5]  R L Gordon,et al.  Traffic Control Systems Handbook , 1996 .

[6]  Alexander Skabardonis Determination of Timings in Signal Systems with Traffic-Actuated Controllers , 1996 .

[7]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Automated tuning of ITS management and control systems: Results from real-life experiments , 2016 .

[8]  Elias B. Kosmatopoulos,et al.  International comparative field evaluation of a traffic-responsive signal control strategy in three cities. , 2006 .

[9]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Centralised versus decentralised signal control of large‐scale urban road networks in real time: a simulation study , 2018, IET Intelligent Transport Systems.

[10]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Adaptive Performance Optimization for Large-Scale Traffic Control Systems , 2009, CTS 2009.

[11]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Applications of the urban traffic control strategy TUC , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Application and Evaluation of the Signal Traffic Control Strategy TUC in Chania , 2005, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[13]  Wang,et al.  Review of road traffic control strategies , 2003, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[14]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  A Multivariable Regulator Approach to Traffic-Responsive Network-Wide Signal Control , 2000 .