User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View

Information technology (IT) acceptance research has yielded many competing models, each with different sets of acceptance determinants. In this paper, we (1) review user acceptance literature and discuss eight prominent models, (2) empirically compare the eight models and their extensions, (3) formulate a unified model that integrates elements across the eight models, and (4) empirically validate the unified model. The eight models reviewed are the theory of reasoned action, the technology acceptance model, the motivational model, the theory of planned behavior, a model combining the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior, the model of PC utilization, the innovation diffusion theory, and the social cognitive theory. Using data from four organizations over a six-month period with three points of measurement, the eight models explained between 17 percent and 53 percent of the variance in user intentions to use information technology. Next, a unified model, called the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), was formulated, with four core determinants of intention and usage, and up to four moderators of key relationships. UTAUT was then tested using the original data and found to outperform the eight individual models (adjusted R2 of 69 percent). UTAUT was then confirmed with data from two new organizations with similar results (adjusted R2 of 70 percent). UTAUT thus provides a useful tool for managers needing to assess the likelihood of success for new technology introductions and helps them understand the drivers of acceptance in order to proactively design interventions (including training, marketing, etc.) targeted at populations of users that may be less inclined to adopt and use new systems. The paper also makes several recommendations for future research including developing a deeper understanding of the dynamic influences studied here, refining measurement of the core constructs used in UTAUT, and understanding the organizational outcomes associated with new technology use.

[1]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[2]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  A General Approach for Representing Constructs in Organizational Research , 1998 .

[3]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation , 1985 .

[4]  David E. Keys Gender, sex role, and career decision making of certified management accountants , 1985 .

[5]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology , 1988 .

[6]  S. Bem The BSRI and gender schema theory: A reply to Spence and Helmreich. , 1981 .

[7]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Integrating Diffusion of Innovations and Theory of Reasoned Action models to predict utilization of information technology by end-users , 1996 .

[8]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and Voice Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 1996, ICIS.

[9]  Venkatesh,et al.  Computer Technology Training in the Workplace: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Effect of Mood. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[10]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research , 1988 .

[11]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[12]  D. Hall,et al.  Relationships of age and seniority with career variables of engineers and scientists. , 1975 .

[13]  Mark Vandenbosch,et al.  Research Report: Richness Versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions - Understanding Merchant Adoption of a Smart Card-Based Payment System , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  R. Helson,et al.  Personality change in women from college to midlife. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Richard,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace , 2022 .

[16]  F. Fisher Tests of Equality Between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions: An Expository Note , 1970 .

[17]  J. Christopher West,et al.  Global Electronic Commerce: Theory and Cases , 1999 .

[18]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[19]  Henri Barki,et al.  Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use , 1994 .

[20]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[21]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience , 1995 .

[22]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[23]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Venkatesh,et al.  A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision-Making Processes. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[25]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Investigating the Support Role of the Information Center , 1990, MIS Q..

[26]  B. Efron,et al.  A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and , 1983 .

[27]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach. , 1974 .

[28]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[29]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[31]  S. J. Motowidlo,et al.  Sex role orientation and behavior in a work setting. , 1982 .

[32]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Conceptual Versus Procedural Software Training for Graphical User Interfaces: A Longitudinal Field Experiment , 1994, MIS Q..

[33]  Paul T. P. Wong,et al.  On the importance of being masculine: Sex role, attribution, and women's career achievement , 1985 .

[34]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[35]  J. Twenge Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis , 1997 .

[36]  Susan R. Rhodes Age-Related Differences in Work Attitudes and Behavior: A Review and Conceptual Analysis , 1983 .

[37]  Cynthia K. Riemenschneider,et al.  Executive Decisions About Adoption of Information Technology in Small Business: Theory and Empirical Tests , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[39]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Job attitudes in management: II. Perceived importance of needs as a function of job level. , 1963 .

[40]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies , 1997 .

[41]  Catherine Kirchmeyer,et al.  Change and stability in managers' gender roles , 2002 .

[42]  J. Christopher Westland,et al.  Global Electronic Commerce: Theory and Case Studies , 1999 .

[43]  Rosalind C. Barnett,et al.  The relationship between women's work and family roles and their subjective well-being and psychological distress. , 1991 .

[44]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing , 1995 .

[45]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[46]  P. P. Lynott,et al.  The Impact of Age vs. Life Experience on the Gender Role Attitudes of Women in Different Cohorts , 2000, Journal of women & aging.

[47]  J. Colquitt,et al.  Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: a meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[48]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[49]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Influence of Experience on Personal Computer Utilization: Testing a Conceptual Model , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[50]  J. Levy,et al.  INTERSECTIONS OF GENDER AND AGING , 1988 .

[51]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[52]  Ann Sloan Devlin,et al.  Biographic and Personal Characteristics of Women in Management. , 1992 .

[53]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[54]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[55]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 1996 .

[56]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[57]  Daryl J. Bem,et al.  ON PREDICTING SOME OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME: THE SEARCH FOR CROSS-SITUATIONAL CONSISTENCIES IN BEHAVIOR , 1974 .

[58]  N. Bozionelos,et al.  Psychology of Computer Use: XXXIX. Prevalence of Computer Anxiety in British Managers and Professionals , 1996, Psychological reports.

[59]  L GoodhueDale,et al.  Task-technology fit and individual performance , 1995 .

[60]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation , 1999, MIS Q..

[61]  J. Miller,et al.  Toward a new psychology of women , 1976 .

[62]  James N. Butcher,et al.  Masculinity, femininity, and androgyny viewed and assessed as distinct concepts. , 1983 .

[63]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[64]  B. Roberts,et al.  Plaster or plasticity: are adult work experiences associated with personality change in women? , 1997, Journal of personality.

[65]  S. West,et al.  Statistical issues in the study of temporal data: daily experiences. , 1991, Journal of personality.

[66]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[67]  J. Eichinger,et al.  Situational shifts in sex role orientation: Correlates of work satisfaction and burnout among women in special education , 1991 .

[68]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Understanding user evaluations of information systems , 1995 .

[69]  M. Reuchlin,et al.  DIFFERENTIAL PSYCHOLOGY , 1966 .

[70]  S. Feldman,et al.  Impact of parenthood on various aspects of masculinity and femininity: A short-term longitudinal study. , 1983 .

[71]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[72]  P. R. Warshaw A New Model for Predicting Behavioral Intentions: An Alternative to Fishbein , 1980 .

[73]  Carolyn M. Jagacinski,et al.  Androgyny in a male-dominated field: The relationship of sex-typed traits to performance and satisfaction in engineering , 1987 .

[74]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[75]  Catherine Kirchmeyer,et al.  Gender Roles in a Traditionally Female Occupation: A Study of Emergency, Operating, Intensive Care, and Psychiatric Nurses☆ , 1997 .

[76]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[77]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[78]  G. Chow Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions (econometrics voi 28 , 1960 .

[79]  R. Helson,et al.  Personality change in women from college to midlife. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[80]  R. Ashmore,et al.  Sex, gender, and the individual. , 1998 .

[81]  V. Venkatesh,et al.  AGE DIFFERENCES IN TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION DECISIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR A CHANGING WORK FORCE , 2000 .

[82]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[83]  G. Baril,et al.  Are Androgynous Managers Really More Effective? , 1989 .

[84]  R. Vallerand Toward A Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation , 1997 .

[85]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[86]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[87]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[88]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .