Comparative uncertainty analysis of energy coefficients in energy analysis of dairy farms from two French territories.

Fossil energy analysis, also called cumulative energy demand, is a current method for environmental assessment of agricultural systems. It consists of assessing fossil energy directly consumed on the farm and indirectly consumed to produce farm inputs. Application of the method is based on the sum of the quantity of each farm input multiplied by its energy coefficient, which represents fossil energy use during the life cycle of the input, including extraction, manufacturing and disposal of the raw and auxiliary materials. The range of values for energy coefficients proposed in the literature and variability in their context of application challenges the confidence in estimates of fossil energy use. To offer an initial representation of this uncertainty and to propose improvements for including uncertainty in energy coefficients, a fossil energy analysis completed by uncertainty and sensitivity analyses was applied to dairy farms from two differing French territories: Poitou-Charentes (PC) and Reunion Island (RI). Monte-Carlo simulation of 30,000 sets of coefficients randomly drawn from the ranges of values found in the literature shows a 95% confidence interval ranging from 3.6 to 5.0 MJ L−1 of raw milk for PC and 5.8–8.2 MJ L−1 of raw milk for RI. This represents a variation around the mean of ±16% for PC and ±17% for RI. This also highlights the need for a standardized and clearly defined method for calculating energy coefficients, especially regionally adapted ones, to accurately estimate fossil energy use of agricultural systems throughout the world. Calculation of a more accurate energy coefficient could be associated with a preliminary sensitivity analysis performed with minimum and maximum values of energy coefficients from the literature to identify the most influential coefficients and adapt them to local conditions. This avoids time-consuming adaptation of all energy coefficients, but requires accurate information about life-cycle inputs. Since energy coefficients are not the only source of uncertainty in fossil energy analysis, however, other guidelines are provided, especially concerning data inputs.

[1]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  H. Koknaroglu,et al.  Cultural energy analyses of dairy cattle receiving different concentrate levels. , 2010 .

[3]  N. Nahar,et al.  Energy use pattern in production agriculture of a typical village in arid zone India: part II , 2002 .

[4]  J. Grönroos,et al.  Energy use in conventional and organic milk and rye bread production in Finland , 2006 .

[5]  Richard C. Fluck,et al.  Energy in farm production , 1992 .

[6]  Iman Beheshti Tabar,et al.  Energy balance in Iran's agronomy (1990-2006) , 2010 .

[7]  İbrahim Yilmaz,et al.  An analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey , 2005 .

[8]  B. Dale,et al.  Cumulative Energy and Global Warming Impact from the Production of Biomass for Biobased Products , 2003 .

[9]  R. Schils,et al.  Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in organic and conventional farming systems in the Netherlands , 2014 .

[10]  M. Nguyen,et al.  Energy and labour efficiency for three pairs of conventional and alternative mixed cropping (pasture-arable) farms in Canterbury, New Zealand , 1995 .

[11]  D. Pimentel Handbook of Energy Utilization In Agriculture , 1980 .

[12]  P. K. Ghosh,et al.  Bioenergy and economic analysis of soybean-based crop production systems in central India , 2002 .

[13]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Data quality management for life cycle inventories—an example of using data quality indicators☆ , 1996 .

[14]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models , 2004 .

[15]  G. Guzmán,et al.  A comparison of energy use in conventional and organic olive oil production in Spain , 2008 .

[16]  Shahin Rafiee,et al.  ENERGY USE AND ECONOMICAL ANALYSIS OF POTATO PRODUCTION IN IRAN A CASE STUDY: ARDABIL PROVINCE , 2008 .

[17]  N. Halberg,et al.  Energy Utilization in Crop and Dairy Production in Organic and Conventional Livestock Production Systems , 1998 .

[18]  G. Marland,et al.  A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture: comparing tillage practices in the United States , 2002 .

[19]  P. Veysset,et al.  Energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and economic performance assessments in French Charolais suckler cattle farms: Model-based analysis and forecasts , 2010 .

[20]  N. B. Mclaughlin,et al.  Comparison of energy inputs for inorganic fertilizer and manure based corn production , 2000 .

[21]  Christian Bockstaller,et al.  Assessment of energy use in arable farming systems by means of an agro-ecological indicator: the energy indicator , 2002 .

[22]  J. Pedersen,et al.  A Nordic proposal for an energy corrected milk (ECM) formula , 1991 .

[23]  R. M. Peart,et al.  CIGR handbook of agricultural engineering, Volume 5: Energy and biomass engineering. , 1999 .

[24]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Emergy evaluations and environmental loading of electricity production systems , 2002 .

[25]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Cumulative energy demand as predictor for the environmental burden of commodity production. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  K. Jaggard,et al.  An assessment of the energy inputs and greenhouse gas emissions in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) production in the UK , 2005 .

[27]  Philippe Lecomte,et al.  Evaluating the ability of current energy use assessment methods to study contrasting livestock production systems. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[28]  M. Wallace,et al.  A life cycle assessment of seasonal grass-based and confinement dairy farms , 2012 .

[29]  C. Cederberg,et al.  Life cycle assessment of milk production — a comparison of conventional and organic farming , 2000 .

[30]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Uncertainty analysis in life cycle inventory. Application to the production of electricity with French coal power plants , 2000 .

[31]  Yuexian Liu,et al.  Life cycle assessment of fossil energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in Chinese pear production , 2010 .

[32]  G. Pellizzi Use of energy and labour in Italian agriculture , 1992 .

[33]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Energy Analysis of Sugarcane Production in Morocco , 2001 .

[34]  J. Moreira,et al.  Energy Balance for Ethyl Alcohol Production from Crops , 1978, Science.

[35]  H. Lindmark-Månsson,et al.  Composition of Swedish dairy milk , 2003 .

[36]  G. Haas,et al.  Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment , 2001 .

[37]  S. Bonny,et al.  Is agriculture using more and more energy? A French case study , 1993 .

[38]  D. Hume,et al.  Energy analysis of tillage and herbicide inputs in alternative weed management systems , 1995 .

[39]  D. Hamby A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models , 1994, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[40]  C. Basset-Mens,et al.  Implications of Uncertainty and Variability in the Life Cycle Assessment of Pig Production Systems(7 pp) , 2006 .

[41]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  Choice of system boundaries in life cycle assessment , 1994 .

[42]  R. Zentner,et al.  Effects of tillage method and crop rotation on non-renewable energy use efficiency for a thin Black Chernozem in the Canadian Prairies. , 2004 .

[43]  Bengt Steen,et al.  On uncertainty and sensitivity of LCA-based priority setting , 1997 .

[44]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Food Production and the Energy Crisis , 1973, Science.

[45]  M. B. Green Energy in pesticide manufacture, distribution and use , 1987 .

[46]  Claudine Basset-Mens,et al.  Implications of Uncertainty and Variability in the Life Cycle Assessment of Pig Farming Systems , 2004 .

[47]  Ibrahim Akinci,et al.  ENERGY USE PATTERN OF SOME FIELD CROPS AND VEGETABLE PRODUCTION: CASE STUDY FOR ANTALYA REGION, TURKEY , 2005 .

[48]  M. Meul,et al.  Energy use efficiency of specialised dairy, arable and pig farms in Flanders , 2007 .

[49]  B. Basso,et al.  Energy Use and Economic Evaluation of a Three Year Crop Rotation for Conservation and Organic Farming in NE Italy , 2005 .

[50]  S N Rai,et al.  Uncertainty and variability analysis in multiplicative risk models. , 1998, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[51]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Identification of key issues for further investigation in improving the reliability of life-cycle assessments , 1996 .

[52]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis , 2004 .

[53]  H. V. D. van der Werf,et al.  An operational method for the evaluation of resource use and environmental impacts of dairy farms by life cycle assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.