Foraging in Mind

People and other animals can search for information inside their heads. Where does this ability come from, and what does it enable cognitive systems to do? In this article, we address the behavioral and cognitive similarities between search in external environments and internal environments (e.g., memory). These require both maplike representations and the means to navigate them, and the latter involves modulation between exploitation and exploration analogous to a foraging process called area-restricted search. These findings have implications for understanding a number of cognitive abilities commonly considered to be hallmarks of the human species, such as well-developed executive control and goal-directed cognition, autonoetic consciousness (i.e., self-awareness), deliberation, and free will. Moreover, this research extends our conception of what organisms may share these abilities and how they evolved.

[1]  P. Pye-Smith The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[2]  Daniel C. Dennett,et al.  Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting , 1986 .

[3]  Andreas Wilke,et al.  Fishing for the Right Words: Decision Rules for Human Foraging Behavior in Internal Search Tasks , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Donna Rose Addis,et al.  Mental time travel and the shaping of the human mind , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  E. Tulving Memory and consciousness. , 1985 .

[6]  E. Charnov Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[7]  Thomas T. Hills Animal Foraging and the Evolution of Goal-Directed Cognition , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Cognitive search : evolution, algorithms, and the brain , 2012 .

[9]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  A Game of Hide and Seek: Expectations of Clumpy Resources Influence Hiding and Searching Patterns , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  Thomas T. Hills Neurocognitive free will , 2019, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[11]  Andreas Wilke,et al.  The hot hand phenomenon as a cognitive adaptation to clumped resources , 2009 .

[12]  Luis Pacheco-Cobos,et al.  Nahua mushroom gatherers use area-restricted search strategies that conform to marginal value theorem predictions , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  R. Engle,et al.  The role of working memory capacity in retrieval. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  Matthijs A. A. van der Meer,et al.  Hippocampal Replay Is Not a Simple Function of Experience , 2010, Neuron.

[15]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Dynamic search and working memory in social recall. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Adaptive Lévy Processes and Area-Restricted Search in Human Foraging , 2013, PloS one.

[17]  Brad E. Pfeiffer,et al.  Hippocampal place cell sequences depict future paths to remembered goals , 2013, Nature.

[18]  B. Hood,et al.  The influence of cognitive load on spatial search performance , 2013, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[19]  A. Redish,et al.  Vicarious trial and error , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  J. Crystal Animal Models of Episodic Memory , 2018 .

[21]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  The central executive as a search process: priming exploration and exploitation across domains. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  Uri Alon,et al.  Creative exploration as a scale-invariant search on a meaning landscape , 2018, Nature Communications.

[23]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Reflections of the Environment in Memory Form of the Memory Functions , 2022 .

[24]  Matthijs A. A. van der Meer,et al.  Internally generated sequences in learning and executing goal-directed behavior , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  P. Todd,et al.  The Evolutionary Psychology of Extraterrestrial Intelligence: Are There Universal Adaptations in Search, Aversion, and Signaling? , 2018 .

[26]  E. Tolman Cognitive maps in rats and men. , 1948, Psychological review.

[27]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Search in External and Internal Spaces , 2008, Psychological science.

[28]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  From foraging to autonoetic consciousness: The primal self as a consequence of embodied prospective foraging , 2015 .

[29]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Optimal foraging in semantic memory. , 2012, Psychological review.

[30]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Mechanisms of age-related decline in memory search across the adult life span. , 2013, Developmental psychology.

[31]  A. Baddeley Working Memory, Thought, and Action , 2007 .

[32]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Lower Attentional Skills predict increased exploratory foraging patterns , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[33]  Pamela Effrein Sandstrom,et al.  Information Foraging Theory: Adaptive Interaction with Information , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Search of associative memory. , 1981 .

[35]  Andreas Wilke,et al.  Spatial Dependency in Local Resource Distributions , 2018, Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences.

[36]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Hidden processes in structural representations: A reply to Abbott, Austerweil, and Griffiths (2015). , 2015, Psychological review.

[37]  M. Plank,et al.  Optimal foraging: Lévy pattern or process? , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[38]  M. Feldman,et al.  Evolution in leaps: The punctuated accumulation and loss of cultural innovations , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Don C. Locke Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting , 1986 .

[40]  P. Todd,et al.  Patch leaving in humans: can a generalist adapt its rules to dispersal of items across patches? , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  Joshua T. Abbott,et al.  Random walks on semantic networks can resemble optimal foraging. , 2015, Psychological review.

[42]  Peter Pirolli,et al.  Information foraging theory , 2007 .

[43]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  Jared Lorince Consumption of Content on the Web: An Ecologically Inspired Perspective , 2016 .

[45]  Michael N. Jones,et al.  Comparing models of semantic fluency: Do humans forage optimally, or walk randomly? , 2018, CogSci.

[46]  M. Kane,et al.  Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: The influences of sustained and selective attention , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[47]  W. Kintsch,et al.  High-Dimensional Semantic Space Accounts of Priming. , 2006 .