Variability of visual threshold in multiple sclerosis: effect of background luminance on frequency of seeing.

Visual thresholds were measured at four different background luminance levels in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and in control subjects by means of frequency-of-seeing curves. Results were examined by probit analysis and measures of threshold and threshold variability were obtained. Comparison of patient and control groups showed that the patient's threshold was significantly raised only at the highest background luminance level, but that threshold variability was greater at all three non-zero background luminance levels tested. In addition, threshold variability increased with background luminance in the MS patients but not in the control subjects. Possible underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are discussed, and it is suggested that this luminance-dependent variability in visual threshold shown by patients with multiple sclerosis may be due to intermittent conduction block or ephaptic transmission occurring within the demyelinated visual pathway.

[1]  T A Sears,et al.  The effects of experimental demyelination on conduction in the central nervous system. , 1970, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  Jacob Nachmias,et al.  Signal Detection Theory and its Application to Problems in Vision , 1972 .

[3]  C. G. Mueller,et al.  FREQUENCY OF SEEING FUNCTIONS FOR INTENSITY DISCRIMINATION AT VARIOUS LEVELS OF ADAPTING INTENSITY , 1951, The Journal of general physiology.

[4]  H R BLACKWELL,et al.  Neural theories of simple visual discriminations. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[5]  H. Harms.  Role of perimetry in assessment of optic nerve dysfunction. , 1976, Transactions of the ophthalmological societies of the United Kingdom.

[6]  J. Swets,et al.  A decision-making theory of visual detection. , 1954, Psychological review.

[7]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Pure central responses from off‐centre cells and pure surround responses from on‐centre cells , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  H. Barlow,et al.  Changes in the maintained discharge with adaptation level in the cat retina , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  J. Stone,et al.  Properties of cat retinal ganglion cells: a comparison of W-cells with X- and Y-cells. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  W. Lillie.  The Clinical Significance of Retrobulbar and Optic Neuritis , 1934 .

[11]  C Ellenberger,et al.  Modern perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic diagnosis. , 1974, Archives of neurology.

[12]  J. Stone,et al.  Summing properties of the cat's retinal ganglion cell. , 1968, Vision research.

[13]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Adaptation and dynamics of cat retinal ganglion cells , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  T A Sears,et al.  Internodal conduction in undissected demyelinated nerve fibres , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  M. Kuno,et al.  Electrophysiological properties of spinal motoneurones of normal and dystrophic mice. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  R. Burde,et al.  Visual parameters associated with recovered retrobulbar optic neuritis. , 1975, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  M. Rasminsky.  Ectopic generation of impulses and cross‐talk in spinal nerve roots of “dystrophic” mice , 1978, Annals of neurology.

[18]  C. Westerberg,et al.  Paroxysmal attacks in multiple sclerosis. , 1975, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Properties of the surround response mechanism of cat retinal ganglion cells and centre‐surround interaction , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  J M Enoch,et al.  Further perimetric analysis of patients with lesions of the visual pathways. , 1970, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  G. Ellison,et al.  Criteria for the clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis , 1976, Neurology.

[22]  W. Mcdonald.  Acute optic neuritis. , 1984 .