Phase ii trial of bevacizumab and erlotinib as a second-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Background: Early clinical studies of bevacizumab and erlotinib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have a tolerable toxicity and a promising clinical outcome. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of this combination as a second-line therapy for HCC refractory to sorafenib. Methods: For this single-arm, Phase II study, we recruited patients with Child–Pugh class A or B liver disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–2, and advanced HCC that was not amenable to surgical or regional therapies and treatment with sorafenib had failed (disease progressed or patient could not tolerate sorafenib). Patients received 10 mg/kg intravenous bevacizumab every 14 days and 150 mg oral erlotinib daily for 28-day cycles until progression. Tumor response was evaluated every two cycles using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The primary end point was the 16-week progression-free survival rate. Secondary end points included time to progression and overall survival. Results: A total of 44 patients were enrolled and had a median follow-up time of 33.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.5 months – not defined). The 16-week progression-free survival rate was 43% (95% CI: 28%–59%), median time to progression was 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.0–8.3 months), and median overall survival duration was 9.9 months (95% CI: 8.3–15.5 months). Grade 3–4 adverse events included fatigue (13%), acne (11%), diarrhea (9%), anemia (7%), and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (7%). Conclusion: Bevacizumab plus erlotinib was tolerable and showed a signal of survival benefit in the second-line setting for patients with advanced HCC. Because standard-of-care options are lacking in this setting, further studies to identify predictors of response to this regimen are warranted.

[1]  M. Kudo,et al.  Global patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma management from diagnosis to death: the BRIDGE Study , 2015, Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver.

[2]  Joon-Oh Park,et al.  Ramucirumab (RAM) as second-line treatment in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Analysis of patients with elevated {alpha}-fetoprotein (AFP) from the randomized phase III REACH study. , 2015 .

[3]  M. Kudo,et al.  EVOLVE-1: Phase 3 study of everolimus for advanced HCC that progressed during or after sorafenib. , 2014 .

[4]  A. Kaseb Beyond the Basics: The Differential Effects of Demographics and Hepatitis Status on Treatment Outcome in Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2013, Oncology.

[5]  Yoon-Koo Kang,et al.  Bevacizumab with Erlotinib as First-line Therapy in Asian Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Phase II Study , 2013, Oncology.

[6]  I. Makhoul,et al.  Bevacizumab and Erlotinib in Previously Untreated Inoperable and Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2013, American journal of clinical oncology.

[7]  C. Porta,et al.  Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: subanalyses of a phase III trial. , 2012, Journal of hepatology.

[8]  P. Philip,et al.  Phase 2 study of bevacizumab plus erlotinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular cancer , 2012, Cancer.

[9]  S. Fan,et al.  Phase II study of bevacizumab and erlotinib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients with sorafenib-refractory disease , 2012, Investigational New Drugs.

[10]  J. Bruix,et al.  Plasma Biomarkers as Predictors of Outcome in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[11]  Jeffrey S. Morris,et al.  Efficacy of Bevacizumab plus Erlotinib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Predictors of Outcome: Final Results of a Phase II Trial , 2012, Oncology.

[12]  R. Finn,et al.  Phase II, Open-Label Study of Brivanib as Second-Line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[13]  Jeffrey S. Morris,et al.  Phase II trial of the combination of bevacizumab and erlotinib in patients who have advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  S. Paggi,et al.  Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  T. Berg,et al.  Angiopoietin-2 Serum Levels Are Elevated in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2007, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[16]  H. El‐Serag,et al.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. , 2007, Gastroenterology.

[17]  Y. Takeda,et al.  Expression pattern of angiogenic factors and prognosis after hepatic resection in hepatocellular carcinoma: importance of angiopoietin‐2 and hypoxia‐induced factor‐1a , 2006, Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver.

[18]  E. Taniguchi,et al.  Overexpression of angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 in hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2004, Journal of hepatology.

[19]  H. Yu,et al.  Overexpression of VEGF and Angiopoietin 2: A Key to High Vascularity of Hepatocellular Carcinoma? , 2003, Modern Pathology.

[20]  M. Kuwano,et al.  ZD1839 (Iressa) induces antiangiogenic effects through inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. , 2002, Cancer research.

[21]  M. Kojiro,et al.  Expressions of epidermal growth factor family and its receptor in hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines: relationship to cell proliferation. , 1999, International journal of oncology.

[22]  M. Makuuchi,et al.  Biologic significance of angiopoietin-2 expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma. , 1999, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[23]  Yoon-Koo Kang,et al.  Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[24]  Zu-bing Chen,et al.  The angiogenic and prognostic implications of VEGF, Ang-1, Ang-2, and MMP-9 for hepatocellular carcinoma with background of hepatitis B virus , 2009, Medical oncology.

[25]  M Van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[26]  N. Fausto Growth factors in liver development, regeneration and carcinogenesis. , 1991, Progress in growth factor research.

[27]  D. Woodfield Hepatocellular carcinoma. , 1986, The New Zealand medical journal.