An economic viability analysis on energy-saving solutions for wireless access networks

As the energy bill for mobile operators rises with the continuing traffic growth, energy efficiency problems attract an increasing attention in the telecommunication industry. However, the investment for the implementation of any energy-saving solution could be so costly that it may not achieve the total cost reduction. Therefore, the economic viability of the proposed solutions is of substantial importance for the operators in the process of investment decisions. In this paper, we present a methodology for assessing the economic viability of energy-saving solutions. We conduct two case studies using the proposed methodology, and analyze the cost-benefit tradeoff for: (i) hardware upgrade enabling dynamic sleep mode operation at the base stations (BSs), and (ii) energy efficient network deployment minimizing the network energy consumption. Simulation results show that the hardware upgrade can save up to 60% of energy consumption particularly when the high data rate requirement forces low network resource utilization. Consequently, the solution is shown to be increasingly cost effective as the unit energy cost increases. Network deployment optimized for energy efficiency is shown to bring about further energy savings, but it demands denser deployment of BSs. Thus, it is not deemed as economically viable considering today's cost values.

[1]  Luc Martens,et al.  Modelling and optimization of power consumption in wireless access networks , 2011, Comput. Commun..

[2]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  The global footprint of mobile communications: The ecological and economic perspective , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[3]  Jens Zander,et al.  Modelling the cost of heterogeneous wireless access networks , 2007 .

[4]  K. Johansson Cost Effective Deployment Strategies for Heterogenous Wireless Networks , 2007 .

[5]  Meixia Tao,et al.  A Decentralized Sleep Mechanism in Heterogeneous Cellular Networks With QoS Constraints , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[6]  Preben E. Mogensen,et al.  LTE Capacity Compared to the Shannon Bound , 2007, 2007 IEEE 65th Vehicular Technology Conference - VTC2007-Spring.

[7]  Harald Haas,et al.  Minimizing Base Station Power Consumption , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[8]  Moshe Zukerman,et al.  Energy-Efficient Base-Stations Sleep-Mode Techniques in Green Cellular Networks: A Survey , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[10]  Lilani Kumaranayake,et al.  Allowing for differential timing in cost analyses: discounting and annualization. , 2002, Health policy and planning.

[11]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  Aggregation of variables in load models for interference-coupled cellular data networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[12]  Jens Zander,et al.  Energy Efficient Network Deployment With Cell DTX , 2014, IEEE Communications Letters.

[13]  Di Yuan,et al.  Analysis of Cell Load Coupling for LTE Network Planning and Optimization , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[14]  Magnus Olsson,et al.  Sustainable Wireless Broadband Access to the Future Internet - The EARTH Project , 2013, Future Internet Assembly.

[15]  Antonio Capone,et al.  Radio planning of energy-aware cellular networks , 2010, Comput. Networks.

[16]  Vijay K. Bhargava,et al.  Green Cellular Networks: A Survey, Some Research Issues and Challenges , 2011, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[17]  Muhammad Ali Imran,et al.  How much energy is needed to run a wireless network? , 2011, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[18]  Albrecht J. Fehske,et al.  Energy Efficiency Improvements through Micro Sites in Cellular Mobile Radio Networks , 2009, 2009 IEEE Globecom Workshops.

[19]  Jens Zander,et al.  Energy- and cost-efficient ultra-high-capacity wireless access , 2011, IEEE Wireless Communications.