Virtual reconstruction of the Le Moustier 2 newborn skull.. Implications for Neandertal ontogeny

Here we present a virtual skull reconstruction of the Le Moustier 2 neonate based on high-resolution computed tomographic data of the delicate original fragments. In the first step, the digital fragments were assembled based on anatomical criteria. If parts were missing on one side, or were better preserved on one side than the other, we used the software Avizo to reflect them across a midsagittal symmetry plane. Missing parts of the braincase were estimated based on complete reference crania using geometric morphometrics, so as to estimate endocranial volume (EV).When we compare our reconstruction of Le Moustier 2 to modern human neonates, we find that many morphological characteristics that separate Neandertal adults from modern human adults are already established at the time of birth. Neandertal features can already be detected in the shape of the orbit, the projection of the midface, the relative size and shape of the nose, the nasal bones, and the shape of the mandibular notch. The shape differences between Le Moustier 2 and modern human neonates in the cranial base are extremely subtle. Around the time of birth modern humans and Neandertals have very similar endocranial shapes and volumes. Our EV estimates for Le Moustier 2 range between 408–428 cc.Our reconstruction of Le Moustier 2 shows that most facial differences between modern humans and Neandertals develop prenatally as they are already established at the time of birth. Most shape differences in the braincase between modern humans and Neandertals, however, develop after birth. Our reconstruction of Le Moustier 2 therefore supports the notion that modern humans and Neandertals reach similar adult endocranial capacity through different postnatal ontogenetic pathways.

[1]  Tanya M. Smith,et al.  Dental evidence for ontogenetic differences between modern humans and Neanderthals , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  P. Gunz,et al.  Brain development after birth differs between Neanderthals and modern humans , 2010, Current Biology.

[3]  P. Gunz,et al.  Endocranial shape changes during growth in chimpanzees and humans: a morphometric analysis of unique and shared aspects. , 2010, Journal of human evolution.

[4]  J. Richtsmeier,et al.  New insights into the relationship between suture closure and craniofacial dysmorphology in sagittal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis , 2010, Journal of anatomy.

[5]  E. Bruner Morphological Differences in the Parietal Lobes within the Human Genus , 2010, Current Anthropology.

[6]  C. Zollikofer,et al.  The evolution of hominin ontogenies. , 2010, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[7]  A. Rosas,et al.  Effects of brain and facial size on basicranial form in human and primate evolution. , 2010, Journal of human evolution.

[8]  K. Harvati Into Eurasia: a geometric morphometric re-assessment of the Upper Cave (Zhoukoudian) specimens. , 2009, Journal of human evolution.

[9]  P. Gunz,et al.  The pattern of endocranial ontogenetic shape changes in humans , 2009, Journal of anatomy.

[10]  J. Richtsmeier,et al.  Morphological integration of the skull in craniofacial anomalies. , 2009, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[11]  Gerhard W Weber,et al.  Principles for the virtual reconstruction of hominin crania. , 2009, Journal of human evolution.

[12]  J. Hublin,et al.  Neandertal birth canal shape and the evolution of human childbirth , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Fred L Bookstein,et al.  Early modern human diversity suggests subdivided population structure and a complex out-of-Africa scenario , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  A. Rosas,et al.  Mosaic Evolution of the Basicranium in Homo and its Relation to Modular Development , 2009, Evolutionary Biology.

[15]  V. Doronichev,et al.  Neanderthal brain size at birth provides insights into the evolution of human life history , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  A. Rosas,et al.  Thin-plate spline analysis of the cranial base in African, Asian and European populations and its relationship with different malocclusions. , 2008, Archives of Oral Biology.

[17]  B. Hallgrímsson,et al.  Spatial packing, cranial base angulation, and craniofacial shape variation in the mammalian skull: testing a new model using mice , 2008, Journal of anatomy.

[18]  A. Rosas,et al.  Human craniofacial sphericity: a simultaneous analysis of frontal and lateral cephalograms of a Japanese population using geometric morphometrics and partial least squares analysis. , 2008, Archives of oral biology.

[19]  D. Reid,et al.  Variation in modern human premolar enamel formation times: implications for Neandertals. , 2008, Journal of human evolution.

[20]  D. Lieberman,et al.  Middle cranial fossa anatomy and the origin of modern humans. , 2008, Anatomical record.

[21]  Jean-Jacques Hublin,et al.  Rapid dental development in a Middle Paleolithic Belgian Neanderthal , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  A. Rosas,et al.  Facial ontogeny in Neanderthals and modern humans , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  A. Rosas,et al.  Craniofacial levels and the morphological maturation of the human skull , 2006, Journal of anatomy.

[24]  Elisabeth K. Nicholson,et al.  Quantitative analysis of human mandibular shape using three-dimensional geometric morphometrics. , 2006, American journal of physical anthropology.

[25]  A. Rosas,et al.  Correlated variation between the lateral basicranium and the face: a geometric morphometric study in different human groups. , 2006, Archives of oral biology.

[26]  J. Richtsmeier,et al.  Phenotypic integration of neurocranium and brain. , 2006, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.

[27]  T. A. Bishop,et al.  Anterior tooth growth periods in Neandertals were comparable to those of modern humans. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  D. Lieberman,et al.  Testing hypotheses about tinkering in the fossil record: the case of the human skull. , 2004, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.

[29]  F. Rozzi,et al.  Surprisingly rapid growth in Neanderthals , 2004, Nature.

[30]  Stephen R. Frost,et al.  Neanderthal taxonomy reconsidered: implications of 3D primate models of intra- and interspecific differences. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  J. Arsuaga,et al.  Encephalization and allometric trajectories in the genus Homo: Evidence from the Neandertal and modern lineages , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Cranial integration in Homo: singular warps analysis of the midsagittal plane in ontogeny and evolution. , 2003, Journal of human evolution.

[33]  M. P. D. León Computerized paleoanthropology and Neanderthals: The case of Le Moustier 1 , 2003 .

[34]  C. Zollikofer A computational approach to paleoanthropology , 2003 .

[35]  B. Maureille La redécouverte du nouveau-né néandertalien Le Moustier 2 , 2002 .

[36]  B. Maureille Anthropology: A lost Neanderthal neonate found , 2002, Nature.

[37]  C. Zollikofer,et al.  Neanderthal cranial ontogeny and its implications for late hominid diversity , 2001, Nature.

[38]  A. Tillier The Pech de l’Azé and roc de marsal children (middle paleolithic, France): Skeletal evidence for variation in Neanderthal ontogeny , 1996 .

[39]  Y. Rak The Neanderthal: A new look at an old face , 1986 .

[40]  C. Stringer,et al.  The significance of the fossil hominid skull from Petralona, Greece , 1979 .

[41]  M L Moss,et al.  A functional approach to craniology. , 1960, American journal of physical anthropology.

[42]  M. Burkitt Archives de l'Institut de Paléontologie humaine , 1928, Nature.

[43]  D. Lieberman Speculations about the selective basis for modern human craniofacial form , 2008 .

[44]  O. Pearson Statistical and biological definitions of “anatomically modern” humans: Suggestions for a unified approach to modern morphology , 2008 .

[45]  B. Maureille The rediscovery of Le Moustier 2 Neandertal specimen , 2005 .

[46]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Semilandmarks in Three Dimensions , 2005 .

[47]  K. Harvati The Neanderthal taxonomic position: models of intra- and inter-specific craniofacial variation. , 2003, Journal of human evolution.

[48]  B. Maureille,et al.  The Neandertal perinate from Le Moustier: an exceptional specimen , 2003 .

[49]  A. Rosas Occurrence of neanderthal features in mandibles from the Atapuerca-SH site. , 2001, American journal of physical anthropology.

[50]  R. Martin,et al.  Computer‐assisted paleoanthropology , 1998 .

[51]  E. Trinkaus The Shanidar 3 Neandertal , 1982 .