Smart and Green Buildings Features in the Decision-Making Hierarchy of Office Space Tenants: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Study

In the paper, we investigate the role of smart building or green building innovations on the Polish real estate market using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method on the group of experts (consultants, managers, brokers) that are active on the office market in Krakow (study area). The findings point towards the highest relevance of the localisation factor, but also at the relatively low importance of the features of a sustainable building: building automation and information technology systems, as well as energy efficiency or certification. The findings suggest that despite the growing interest in sustainability and technological advancement amongst office market participants in Krakow, the relative importance of smart and green building features in their decision-making processes is relatively low. The study has some interesting practical implications. The knowledge regarding the relative importance of decision criteria can be valuable for developers and investors because the anticipation of tenants’ expectations is directly linked with return on investment and innovation premiums.

[1]  John M. Quigley,et al.  PROGRAM ON HOUSING AND URBAN POLICY , 1904 .

[2]  Gary E Pivo,et al.  Income, Value, and Returns in Socially Responsible Office Properties , 2010 .

[3]  G. B. Benitez,et al.  The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance , 2018, International Journal of Production Economics.

[4]  Yang Lu,et al.  Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues , 2017, J. Ind. Inf. Integr..

[5]  Y. Ali,et al.  Sustainable construction , 2020, Construction Innovation.

[6]  Justin D. Benefield,et al.  Green Design and the Market for Commercial Office Space , 2010 .

[7]  Franz Fuerst,et al.  Green label signals in an emerging real estate market. A case study of Sao Paulo, Brazil , 2018 .

[8]  Gunther Maier,et al.  Can green building councils serve as third party governance institutions? An economic and institutional analysis , 2012 .

[9]  Yasmin Mohd Adnan,et al.  Property specific criteria for office occupation by tenants of purpose built office buildings in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia , 2012 .

[10]  Rianne Appel-Meulenbroek,et al.  Managing "keep" factors of office tenants to raise satisfaction and loyalty , 2008 .

[11]  Neil Dunse,et al.  Office space requirements: comparing occupiers’ preferences with agents’ perceptions , 2003 .

[12]  Hilde Remøy,et al.  Priorities in Accommodating office user preferences: Impact on office users decision to stay or go , 2014 .

[13]  Yasmin Mohd Adnan,et al.  A multi-criteria framework for office tenants' preferences at office buildings , 2015 .

[14]  Hadi Sarvari,et al.  Risk Assessment in PPP Projects by Applying Different MCDM Methods and Comparative Results Analysis , 2018, Administrative Sciences.

[15]  Charlie Wilson,et al.  Benefits and risks of smart home technologies , 2017 .

[16]  P. Stefanów,et al.  Badania nad właściwościami operacyjnymi metody AHP , 2011 .

[17]  Krzysztof Celka,et al.  Determinants of Office Space Choice , 2011 .

[18]  Glauco Henrique de Sousa Mendes,et al.  Servitization and Industry 4.0 convergence in the digital transformation of product firms: A business model innovation perspective , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[19]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[20]  S. French Decision Theory: An Introduction to the Mathematics of Rationality , 1986 .

[21]  Franz Fuerst,et al.  Green Noise or Green Value? Measuring the Effects of Environmental Certification on Office Values , 2011 .

[22]  Michał Głuszak,et al.  Using the Means-Ends Approach to Understand the Value of Sustainability on the Property Market , 2016 .

[23]  Sławomir Jarek Removing Inconsistency in Pairwise Comparisons Matrix in the AHP , 2016 .

[24]  Kire Trivodaliev,et al.  A review of Internet of Things for smart home: Challenges and solutions , 2017 .

[25]  Gizem Erdoğan,et al.  Land selection criteria for lights out factory districts during the industry 4.0 process , 2019 .

[26]  Małgorzata Rymarzak,et al.  Factors affecting the location of real estate , 2012 .

[27]  Harold A. Linstone,et al.  Technological forecasting and social change , 2011 .

[28]  Albert Lozano-Nieto,et al.  How technology changes the way we teach-benefits and risks , 1998, IPCC 98. Contemporary Renaissance: Changing the Way we Communicate. Proceedings 1998 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (Cat. No.98CH36332).

[29]  Daniel Alex Finkelstein,et al.  Spotlight , 2007 .

[30]  Shengwei Wang,et al.  Intelligent building research: a review , 2005 .

[31]  Rosaria de F. S. M. Russo,et al.  Criteria in AHP: A Systematic Review of Literature , 2015, ITQM.

[32]  B. Marona,et al.  Tenant mix structure in shopping centres: some empirical analyses from Poland , 2016 .

[33]  Yueren Wang,et al.  Adopting Internet of Things for the development of smart buildings: A review of enabling technologies and applications , 2019, Automation in Construction.

[34]  Diego Comin,et al.  Cross-Country Technology Adoption: Making the Theories Face the Facts , 2004 .

[35]  Jiří Franek,et al.  Judgment Scales and Consistency Measure in AHP , 2014 .

[36]  Osama Omar Intelligent building, definitions, factors and evaluation criteria of selection , 2018 .

[37]  Amos Darko,et al.  Drivers for green building : a review of empirical studies , 2017 .

[38]  Yasmin Mohd Adnan,et al.  FACTORS INFLUENCING OFFICE BUILDING OCCUPATION DECISION BY TENANTS IN KUALA LUMPUR CITY CENTRE – A DELPHI STUDY , 2010 .

[39]  Juan M. Corchado,et al.  Tendencies of Technologies and Platforms in Smart Cities: A State-of-the-Art Review , 2018, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[40]  Ralf H. Kaspar,et al.  Group Aggregation Techniques for Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: A Comparative Analysis , 2016 .

[41]  Eugeny I. Batov The Distinctive Features of “Smart” Buildings , 2015 .

[42]  N. Livingstone,et al.  Occupier responses to sustainable real estate: what’s next? , 2017 .

[43]  Michał Głuszak,et al.  Demand for sustainable office space in Poland: the results from a conjoint experiment in Krakow , 2013 .

[44]  G. Newell,et al.  The importance of property-specific attributes in assessing CBD office building quality , 2005 .