New Media, Web 2.0 and Surveillance

This article outlines some basic foundations and academic controversies about Web 2.0 surveillance. Contemporary web platforms, such as Google or Facebook store, process, analyse, and sell large amounts of personal data and user behaviour data. This phenomenon makes studying Internet surveillance and web 2.0 surveillance important. Surveillance can either be defined in a neutral or a negative way. Depending on which surveillance concept one chooses, Internet ⁄web 2.0 surveillance will be defined in different ways. Web 2.0 surveillance studies are in an early stage of development. The debate thus far suggests that one might distinguish between a cultural studies approach and a critical political economy approach in studying web 2.0 surveillance. Web 2.0 surveillance is a form of surveillance that exerts power and domination by making use specific qualities of the contemporary Internet, such as user-generated content and permanent dynamic communication flows. It can be characterized as a system of panoptic sorting, mass self-surveillance and personal mass dataveillance. Facebook is a prototypical example of web 2.0 surveillance that serves economic ends. The problems of Facebook surveillance in particular and web 2.0 surveillance in general include: the complexity of the terms of use and privacy policies, digital inequality, lack of democracy, the commercialization of the Internet, the advancement of market concentration, the attempted manipulation of needs, limitation of the freedom to choose, unpaid value creation of users and intransparency.

[1]  Toshimaru Ogura.  Electronic government and surveillance-oriented society , 2006 .

[2]  Charles J. Sykes.  The End of Privacy , 1999 .

[3]  Roger Burrows,et al.  Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some Initial Considerations , 2007 .

[4]  Christian Fuchs,et al.  Social Networking Sites and Complex Technology Assessment , 2010, Int. J. E Politics.

[5]  Gary T. Marx,et al.  What’s new about the “new surveillance”?: Classifying for change and continuity , 2004 .

[6]  Nicholas Garnham,et al.  Political economy and cultural studies: Reconciliation or divorce? , 1995 .

[7]  Celia Lury,et al.  Cultural Rights: Technology, Legality and Personality.@@@The Panoptic Sort: A Political Economy of Personal Information. , 1993 .

[8]  Gary T. Marx,et al.  What's New About the "New Surveillance"? Classifying for Change and Continuity. , 2002 .

[9]  D. Lyon.  Surveillance Studies: An Overview , 2007 .

[10]  Wendell Bell,et al.  The Third Wave. , 1982 .

[11]  Colin J. Bennett.  The governance of privacy , 2003 .

[12]  Lawrence Grossberg,et al.  Cultural studies vs. political economy: Is anybody else bored with this debate? , 1995 .

[13]  M. Foucault.  Security, Territory, Population , 2005 .

[14]  A. Fontana,et al.  Security, Territory, Population , 2009 .

[15]  Christian Fuchs.  Class, knowledge and new media , 2010 .

[16]  Kieron O'Hara.  The Spy In The Coffee Machine , 2008 .

[17]  Oscar H. Gandy,et al.  The Political Economy of Personal Information , 2011 .

[18]  Roger A. Clarke,et al.  Information technology and dataveillance , 1988, CACM.

[19]  M. Carlson,et al.  Panopticon.com: Online Surveillance and the Commodification of Privacy , 2002 .

[20]  Richard A Spinello,et al.  The end of privacy. , 1997, America.

[21]  Herbert Marcuse,et al.  Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory. , 1942 .

[22]  Christian Fuchs,et al.  Labor in Informational Capitalism and on the Internet , 2010, Inf. Soc..

[23]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[24]  C. Fuchs.  Social Software and Web 2.0: Their Sociological Foundations and Implications , 2010 .

[25]  Kingsley Dennis,et al.  Viewpoint: Keeping a Close Watch – The Rise of Self-Surveillance and the Threat of Digital Exposure , 2008 .

[26]  Lara C. Stache,et al.  Internet and Society: Social Theory in the Information Age , 2012, Rhetoric and Public Affairs.

[27]  David Murakami Wood,et al.  Digitizing Surveillance: Categorization, Space, Inequality , 2003 .

[28]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[29]  M. Castells.  Communication Power: Mass Communication, Mass Self-Communication and Power Relationships in the Network Society , 2009, Media and Society.

[30]  H. Marcuse.  Reason and Revolution , 1941 .

[31]  Clay Shirky,et al.  Here Comes Everybody , 2017 .

[32]  M. Horkheimer,et al.  Eclipse of Reason , 1947 .

[33]  David Lyon,et al.  The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society , 1994 .

[34]  M. Poster,et al.  The mode of information , 1990 .

[35]  Anthony Giddens,et al.  A contemporary critique of historical materialism , 1981 .

[36]  Anders Albrechtslund,et al.  Online Social Networking as Participatory Surveillance , 2008, First Monday.

[37]  David Lyon,et al.  The world wide web of surveillance: The internet and off‐world power‐flows , 1998 .

[38]  James B. Rule,et al.  Social Theory and Modern Sociology. , 1988 .

[39]  C. Fuchs,et al.  Internet and Surveillance , 2011 .

[40]  C. Fuchs.  studiVZ: social networking in the surveillance society , 2010, Ethics and Information Technology.