Features of Engineering Design in Technology Education

The purpose of this study was to find critical features of engineering design that can be incorporated within technology education learning activities, and develop a rubric for assessing these features. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with three professors actively involved in engineering education. Supporting documents such as engineering design course outlines and rubrics were also examined. Using a phenomenological approach, this study identified the concept of engineering design, key features of the engineering design process, and critical elements that should be assessed in an engineering design activity in the context of technology education. A key product of the study was development of a rubric to be used in evaluating integration of engineering design as a focus for technology education.

[1]  Richard H. Hycner.  Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data , 1985 .

[2]  W. Popham.  Classroom Assessment: What Teachers Need to Know , 1995 .

[3]  Sally Sieloff Magnan,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[4]  T. Lewis,et al.  A Turn to Engineering: The Continuing Struggle of Technology Education for Legitimization as a School Subject. , 2004 .

[5]  T. Lewis.  Research in Technology Education--Some Areas of Need. , 1999 .

[6]  international-technology-educati.  Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology , 2000 .

[7]  Fernando Cajas,et al.  Technology Education Research: Potential Directions , 2000 .

[8]  Robert C. Wicklein.  Five Good Reasons for Engineering as the Focus for Technology Education , 2006 .

[9]  C. Moustakas.  Phenomenological Research Methods , 1994 .

[10]  J. A. Hatch,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings , 2002 .

[11]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[12]  M. Manen.  Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy , 1990 .

[13]  Scott A. Warner,et al.  The Status of Design in Technology Teacher Education in the United States , 2004 .

[14]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[15]  D. Caulley.  Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods , 2007 .

[16]  Mary Besterfield-Sacre,et al.  The ABET “Professional Skills” — Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed? , 2005 .

[17]  R. Bogdan.  Qualitative research for education : an introduction to theory and methods / by Robert C. Bogdan and Sari Knopp Biklen , 1997 .

[18]  M. Thomas,et al.  The National Center for Engineering and Technology Education , 2005 .

[19]  Henry Petroski,et al.  Invention by design: how engineers get from thought to thing , 1996 .

[20]  M. Crotty.  The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process , 1998 .

[21]  Myron Britton,et al.  A Qualitative Study of a Course Trilogy in Biosystems Engineering Design , 2005 .

[22]  Jo D. Gallagher.  Classroom Assessment for Teachers , 1997 .

[23]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .