Regulatory Contracts and Cost Efficiency: Stochastic Frontier Evidence from the Italian Local Public Transport

The main objective of this paper is to investigate the way subsidization mechanisms affect the cost efficiency of public transit systems, taking into account the role played by the environmental characteristics of each network. A cost frontier model is estimated for a seven-year panel of 44 Italian transit companies run under two different regulatory schemes (cost-plus or fixed-price), using the approach proposed by Kumbhakar et al. (1991), Huang and Liu (1994) and Battese and Coelli (1995). The main evidence is that, given network characteristics, transit operators with high-powered incentive contracts (fixed-price subsidies) exhibit lower distortions from the minimum costs. Environmental conditions (network speed levels) also have a significant impact on inefficiency differentials and influence the efficacy of incentive regulation. Overall, these results highlight a scope for transport policy to increase X-efficiency. Furthermore, they stress the importance of incentive theory and modern regulatory economics for the production analysis of regulated utilities.

[1]  Loretta J. Mester.  Measuring efficiency at U.S. banks: Accounting for heterogeneity is important , 1997 .

[2]  T. Coelli.  Estimators and hypothesis tests for a stochastic frontier function: A Monte Carlo analysis , 1995 .

[3]  V. Smith.  Experiments with a Decentralized Mechanism for Public Good Decisions , 1980 .

[4]  Douglas W. Caves,et al.  Productivity Growth, Scale Economies, and Capacity Utilization in U.S. Railroads, 1955-74 , 1981 .

[5]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[6]  K. Kerstens.  Technical efficiency measurement and explanation of French urban transit companies , 1996 .

[7]  Kristiaan Kerstens,et al.  Public transit performance: What does one learn from frontier studies? , 2002 .

[8]  Y. Mensah.  A simplification of the Kopp—Diewert method of decomposing cost efficiency and some implications , 1994 .

[9]  G. Battese,et al.  ESTIMATION OF A PRODUCTION FRONTIER MODEL: WITH APPLICATION TO THE PASTORAL ZONE OF EASTERN AUSTRALIA , 1977 .

[10]  C. Lovell,et al.  Stochastic Frontier Analysis: Frontmatter , 2000 .

[11]  Lung-fei Lee,et al.  The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry , 1981 .

[12]  G. Battese,et al.  Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data , 1988 .

[13]  Henry-Jean Gathon.  Indicators Of Partial Productivity And Technical Efficiency In The European Urban Transit Sector , 1989 .

[14]  G. Battese,et al.  Identification of Factors Which Influence the Technical Inefficiency of Indian Farmers , 1996 .

[15]  Hung-Jen Wang,et al.  Heteroscedasticity and Non-Monotonic Efficiency Effects of a Stochastic Frontier Model , 2002 .

[16]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  U.S. Financial Services Consolidation: The Case of Corporate Credit Unions , 2001 .

[17]  Daniele Fabbri.  La Stima di Frontiere di Costo nel Trasporto Pubblico Locale: una Rassegna e un'Applicazione , 1996 .

[18]  Peter Schmidt,et al.  One-Step and Two-Step Estimation of the Effects of Exogenous Variables on Technical Efficiency Levels , 2002 .

[19]  S. Afriat.  Efficiency Estimation of Production Function , 1972 .

[20]  C. Lovell,et al.  On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model , 1982 .

[21]  D. Reifschneider,et al.  SYSTEMATIC DEPARTURES FROM THE FRONTIER: A FRAMEWORK FOR THE ANALYSIS OF FIRM INEFFICIENCY* , 1991 .

[22]  P. Schmidt.  On the Statistical Estimation of Parametric Frontier Production Functions , 1976 .

[23]  K. Kalirajan.  An Econometric Analysis of Yield Variability in Paddy Production , 2008 .

[24]  Philippe Vanden Eeckaut,et al.  Non-frontier measures of efficiency, progress and regress , 1995 .

[25]  R J Windle.  TRANSIT POLICY AND THE COST STRUCTURE OF URBAN BUS TRANSPORTATION. FROM THE BOOK BUS DEREGULATION AND PRIVATISATION , 1988 .

[26]  David A. Hensher.  Urban Transport Economics , 1977 .

[27]  J. Laffont,et al.  A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation , 1993 .

[28]  Massimo Filippini,et al.  Cost Structure and efficiency of Local Public Transport: The case of Emilia Romagna bus companies , 1993 .

[29]  J. Berechman.  Public transit economics and deregulation policy , 1993 .

[30]  Hurvey Leibenstein.  Allocative efficiency vs. X-Efficiency , 1966 .

[31]  S. Kumbhakar,et al.  A Generalized Production Frontier Approach for Estimating Determinants of Inefficiency in U.S. Dairy Farms , 1991 .

[32]  Carlo Cambini,et al.  Il trasporto pubblico locale in Italia. Dopo la riforma i difficili albori di un mercato , 2002 .

[33]  Carlo Cambini,et al.  Competitive Tendering and Optimal Size in the Regional Bus Transportation Industry: An Example from Italy , 2003 .

[34]  Dag Morten Dalen,et al.  Yardsticks on the road: Regulatory contracts and cost efficiency in the Norwegian bus industry , 2003 .

[35]  S. Caudill,et al.  Biases in frontier estimation due to heteroscedasticity , 1993 .

[36]  M. Filippini.  Economies of scale and utilization in the Swiss electric power distribution industry , 1996 .

[37]  Bernard Thiry,et al.  Allowing for inefficiency in parametric estimation of production functions for urban transit firms , 1992 .

[38]  Richard Cornes,et al.  Duality and modern economics , 1993 .

[39]  Patrick S. McCarthy,et al.  Transportation Economics: Theory and Practice : A Case Study Approach , 2001 .

[40]  Sergio Perelman,et al.  Substituabilité partielle des facteurs et efficacité-coût: l'exemple des transports urbain et vicinal belges , 1992 .

[41]  S. Caudill,et al.  Frontier Estimation and Firm-Specific Inefficiency Measures in the Presence of Heteroscedasticity , 1995 .

[42]  Henry Tulkens,et al.  On FDH efficiency analysis: Some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit , 1993 .

[43]  CL Huang,et al.  Estimation of a non-neutral stochastic frontier production function , 1994 .

[44]  Tim Coelli,et al.  A Guide to Frontier version 4. 1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Fu , 1996 .

[45]  A. U.S.,et al.  FORMULATION AND ESTIMATION OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION MODELS , 2001 .

[46]  Marc Ivaldi,et al.  Incentive Regulatory Policies: The Case of Public Transit Systems in France , 2002 .

[47]  Massimo Filippini,et al.  INEFFICIENCY IN A REGULATED INDUSTRY , 1992 .

[48]  S. Kumbhakar,et al.  Ownership structure and cost efficiency: A study of publicly owned passenger-bus transportation companies in India , 1995 .

[49]  Philippe Gagnepain.  Structures productives de l'industrie du transport urbain et effets des schémas réglementaires , 1998 .

[50]  Giovanni Fraquelli,et al.  Regulating Public Transit Networks: How Do Urban-Intercity Diversification and Speed-Up Measures Affect Firms' Cost Performance? , 2004 .

[51]  R. Halvorsen,et al.  The Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations , 1980 .

[52]  Marc Ivaldi,et al.  Stochastic Frontiers and Asymmetric Information Models , 2002 .

[53]  F. FitzRoy,et al.  Season Tickets and the Demand for Public Transport , 1999 .

[54]  K. Hadri.  Estimation of a Doubly Heteroscedastic Stochastic Frontier Cost Function , 1999 .

[55]  Rosella Levaggi.  Parametric and non parametric approach to efficiency: the case of urban transport in Italy , 1994 .

[56]  S. Kumbhakar.  Production frontiers, panel data, and time-varying technical inefficiency , 1990 .

[57]  Andres Gomez-Lobo,et al.  Estimating cost functions in regulated industries characterized by asymmetric information , 1997 .

[58]  Michael W. Tretheway,et al.  Analytical Studies in Transport Economics: Network effects and the measurement of returns to scale and density for U.S. railroads , 1986 .

[59]  G. Battese,et al.  A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data , 1995 .