Performance assessment of geogrid-reinforced railroad ballast during cyclic loading

Abstract Recently, rail practitioners have resorted to the use of geogrids as a low-cost solution to stabilise ballast. In view of this, large-scale cyclic tests have been conducted on reinforced ballast using a modified process simulation test (MPST) apparatus at a loading frequency of 20 Hz, with geogrid placed at the subballast–ballast interface and within the ballast. Fresh latite basalt having a mean particle size of 35 mm and geogrids with different aperture sizes was used. The experimental results indicate that the geogrid arrests the lateral spreading of ballast, reduces the extent of permanent vertical settlement and minimises the particle breakage. However, the in track performance is shown to be influenced by the shear behaviour at the ballast–geogrid interface, wherein the extent of both lateral and vertical deformation reduce with the increase in shear strength at the ballast–geogrid interface. Moreover, the geogrid also helps in minimising the extent of differential track settlement that arises due to the difference in sleeper–ballast contact stress along the track length. The efficiency of geogrid is found to be identical at vertical stresses of 230 and 460 kPa. These test results highlight the role of geogrid in stabilising ballast, thus encouraging its use in railway applications.

[1]  Gerald P Raymond,et al.  The effect of geogrid reinforcement on unbound aggregates , 2003 .

[2]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Performance of geosynthetically-reinforced rail ballast in direct shear conditions , 2012 .

[3]  B. Indraratna,et al.  Effect of confining pressure on ballast degradation and deformation under cyclic triaxial loading , 2007 .

[4]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Effect of confining pressure on the degradation of ballast under cyclic loading , 2005 .

[5]  M J Shenton.  DEFORMATION OF RAILWAY BALLAST UNDER REPEATED LOADING CONDITIONS , 1975 .

[6]  Syed Khaja Karimullah Hussaini.  An experimental study on the deformation behaviour of geosynthetically reinforced ballast , 2013 .

[7]  G P Raymond.  STRESSES AND DEFORMATIONS IN RAILWAY TRACK , 1977 .

[8]  Ernest T. Selig,et al.  Track Geotechnology and Substructure Management , 1995 .

[9]  D Lyon,et al.  THE EFFECT OF TRACK AND VEHICLE PARAMETERS ON WHEEL/RAIL VERTICAL DYNAMIC FORCES , 1974 .

[10]  Jie Han,et al.  Design Method for Geogrid-Reinforced Unpaved Roads. I. Development of Design Method , 2004 .

[11]  Mohamed A. Shahin,et al.  Stabilisation of granular media and formation soil using geosynthetics with special reference to railway engineering , 2007 .

[12]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  GEOGRID REINFORCEMENT OF BALLASTED TRACK , 1987 .

[13]  Braja M. Das,et al.  Geogrid-reinforced railroad bed settlement due to cyclic load , 2002 .

[14]  B. Indraratna,et al.  Field Assessment of the Performance of a Ballasted Rail Track with and without Geosynthetics , 2010 .

[15]  Sujit Kumar Dash,et al.  Performance Improvement of Railway Ballast Using Geocells , 2012 .

[16]  Syed Khaja Karimullah Hussaini,et al.  The lateral displacement response of geogrid-reinforced ballast under cyclic loading , 2013 .

[17]  Jerry A. Yamamuro,et al.  SIGNIFICANCE OF PARTICLE CRUSHING IN GRANULAR MATERIALS , 1996 .

[18]  Nick Thom,et al.  Identifying the key parameters that influence geogrid reinforcement of railway ballast , 2007 .

[19]  B. Indraratna,et al.  Advanced Rail Geotechnology – Ballasted Track , 2011 .

[20]  Raúl J. Marsal,et al.  Large Scale Testing of Rockfill Materials , 1967 .

[21]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  On The Shear Behavior of Ballast-Geosynthetic Interfaces , 2012 .