Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness

Testosterone-dependent secondary sexual characteristics in males may signal immunological competence and are sexually selected for in several species,. In humans, oestrogen-dependent characteristics of the female body correlate with health and reproductive fitness and are found attractive. Enhancing the sexual dimorphism of human faces should raise attractiveness by enhancing sex-hormone-related cues to youth and fertility in females,, and to dominance and immunocompetence in males,,. Here we report the results of asking subjects to choose the most attractive faces from continua that enhanced or diminished differences between the average shape of female and male faces. As predicted, subjects preferred feminized to average shapes of a female face. This preference applied across UK and Japanese populations but was stronger for within-population judgements, which indicates that attractiveness cues are learned. Subjects preferred feminized to average or masculinized shapes of a male face. Enhancing masculine facial characteristics increased both perceived dominance and negative attributions (for example, coldness or dishonesty) relevant to relationships and paternal investment. These results indicate a selection pressure that limits sexual dimorphism and encourages neoteny in humans.

[1]  H. M. Hanson Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  D. Symons Evolution of human sexuality , 1979 .

[3]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Why are distasteful prey not cryptic? , 1980, Nature.

[4]  R. May,et al.  Outward signs of breeding , 1981, Nature.

[5]  M. Andersson Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird , 1982, Nature.

[6]  R. Owen,et al.  Mathematical paradigms for mimicry: Recurrent sampling , 1984 .

[7]  C. Zalenski,et al.  Is There a Double Standard of Aging?1 , 1986 .

[8]  O. Leimar,et al.  Evolutionary Stability of Aposematic Coloration and Prey Unprofitability: A Theoretical Analysis , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[9]  M. Cunningham Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty , 1986 .

[10]  J. Mallet,et al.  Individual selection, kin selection, and the shifting balance in the evolution of warning colours: the evidence from butterflies , 1987 .

[11]  T. J. Roper,et al.  Conspicuousness of distasteful prey affects the strength and durability of one-trial avoidance learning , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  T. Guilford The Evolution of Conspicuous Coloration , 1988, American Naturalist.

[13]  B. Sillén-Tullberg,et al.  EVOLUTION OF GREGARIOUSNESS IN APOSEMATIC BUTTERFLY LARVAE: A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  J. Endler Frequency-dependent predation, crypsis and aposematic coloration. , 1988, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[15]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  Anita P. Barbee,et al.  What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[18]  T. Guilford Evolutionary pathways to aposematism , 1990 .

[19]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek , 1991, Nature.

[20]  A. Møller,et al.  Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments , 1992, Nature.

[21]  T. Roper,et al.  Responses to warning coloration in avian predators , 1992 .

[22]  D. Berry,et al.  Accuracy in Face Perception: A View from Ecological Psychology , 1993 .

[23]  Birgitta Siixén-Tullberg THE EFFECT OF BIASED INCLUSION OF TAXA ON THE CORRELATION BETWEEN DISCRETE CHARACTERS IN PHYLOGENETIC TREES , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  D. Weary,et al.  A PRODUCT OF DISCRIMINATIVE LEARNING MAY LEAD TO FEMALE PREFERENCES FOR ELABORATE MALES , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  A. Booth,et al.  Testosterone and Men's Marriages , 1993 .

[26]  T. Guilford,et al.  Why do warning-coloured prey live gregariously? , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[28]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness , 1994, Nature.

[29]  Lori A. Roggman,et al.  Sexual Selection, Physical Attractiveness, and Facial Neoteny: Cross-cultural Evidence and Implications [and Comments and Reply] , 1995, Current Anthropology.

[30]  N. Barber The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology , 1995 .

[31]  Duncan Rowland,et al.  Manipulating facial appearance through shape and color , 1995, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[32]  Anita P. Barbee,et al.  "Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. , 1995 .

[33]  A. F. Hunter,et al.  Evolution of larval gregariousness in relation to repellent defences and warning coloration in tree-feeding Macrolepidoptera: a phylogenetic analysis based on independent contrasts , 1996 .

[34]  R. Thornhill,et al.  The evolution of human sexuality. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  J. Mappes,et al.  Tracking the evolution of warning signals , 1996, Nature.

[36]  Gabriella Gamberale,et al.  Evidence for a peak-shift in predator generalization among aposematic prey , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Diane Scutt,et al.  Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women , 1997 .

[38]  R. Thornhill,et al.  The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: The role of fluctuating asymmetry , 1997 .

[39]  Richard A. Andersen,et al.  Separate body- and world-referenced representations of visual space in parietal cortex , 1998, Nature.

[40]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Beauty Is in the Eye of the Beholder , 2010, Phunny Stuph.