The Application of the Haddon Matrix to Public Health Readiness and Response Planning

State and local health departments continue to face unprecedented challenges in preparing for, recognizing, and responding to threats to the public’s health. The attacks of 11 September 2001 and the ensuing anthrax mailings of 2001 highlighted the public health readiness and response hurdles posed by intentionally caused injury and illness. At the same time, recent natural disasters have highlighted the need for comparable public health readiness and response capabilities. Public health readiness and response activities can be conceptualized similarly for intentional attacks, natural disasters, and human-caused accidents. Consistent with this view, the federal government has adopted the all-hazards response model as its fundamental paradigm. Adoption of this paradigm provides powerful improvements in efficiency and efficacy, because it reduces the need to create a complex family of situation-specific preparedness and response activities. However, in practice, public health preparedness requires additional models and tools to provide a framework to better understand and prioritize emergency readiness and response needs, as well as to facilitate solutions; this is particularly true at the local health department level. Here, we propose to extend the use of the Haddon matrix—a conceptual model used for more than two decades in injury prevention and response strategies—for this purpose.

[1]  Cheryl Loeb,et al.  Dirty Bombs, The Threat Revisited , 2004 .

[2]  Margaret A Hamburg,et al.  SARS and its implications for U.S. public health policy: "we've been lucky". , 2004, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[3]  A. Taboas,et al.  Establishing remediation levels in response to a radiological dispersal event (or "dirty bomb"). , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Elizabeth Rea,et al.  Public health measures to control the spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome during the outbreak in Toronto. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  G. Andrews,et al.  The urban geography of SARS: paradoxes and dilemmas in Toronto's health care. , 2004, Journal of advanced nursing.

[6]  M. Ofner,et al.  Hospital Preparedness and SARS , 2004, Emerging infectious diseases.

[7]  A. Campbell,et al.  The SARS Commission interim report: SARS and public health in Ontario. , 2004, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[8]  C. Runyan Introduction: back to the future--revisiting Haddon's conceptualization of injury epidemiology and prevention. , 2003, Epidemiologic reviews.

[9]  L. Gostin,et al.  Ethical and legal challenges posed by severe acute respiratory syndrome: implications for the control of severe infectious disease threats. , 2003, JAMA.

[10]  C. Runyan Using the Haddon matrix: introducing the third dimension , 1998, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.