Flexible and Accurate Prior Model Construction Based on Deep Learning for 2-D Magnetotelluric Data Inversion

The conventional magnetotelluric (MT) data inversion methods, such as the nonlinear conjugate gradient method, quasi-Newton method, and Gauss–Newton method and so on, can converge robustly, but their results are easily affected by the initial model and regularization term. Although supervised learning can break through the resolution limitation by directly learning the nonlinear relationship between the model and the data, it cannot guarantee the data fitting without considering physical constraints. Here, we propose a novel prior model generation method using deep learning for conventional inversion to jointly take advantages of the two techniques. We first combine Gaussian random rough surface scheme and random polygon generation algorithm to construct practical 2-D geoelectric models, in which the prior information on the geoelectric structure can be flexibly integrated. Then, a fast 2-D MT forward modeling method is applied to calculate the forward responses and establish the training set. Finally, we use the training set to complete the parameter optimization of U-shaped network (U-NET) and run the conventional inversion with prior model generated by the trained U-NET. Numerical experiments with synthetic data show that the proposed method can effectively integrate the advantages of conventional inversion and supervised learning, and remarkably improve the resolution in the inversion if proper training sets are used. The inversions of the USArray data also prove that our method can retain high-resolution structures predicted by the U-NET in the final inversion results with a data fitting as good as the traditional Gauss–Newton method.

[1]  Yunhe Liu,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Magnetotelluric Inversion for Arbitrarily Anisotropic Earth Using Unstructured Tetrahedral Discretization , 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[2]  D. Colombo,et al.  An airborne micro-TEM and physics deep learning solution to near-surface corrections in sand-covered areas , 2022, The Leading Edge.

[3]  Zongben Xu,et al.  Global optimization with deep-learning-based acceleration surrogate for large-scale seismic acoustic-impedance inversion , 2021, GEOPHYSICS.

[4]  Dikun Yang,et al.  Electrical imaging of hydraulic fracturing fluid using steel-cased wells and a deep-learning method , 2021, GEOPHYSICS.

[5]  K. Innanen,et al.  Physics-guided deep learning for seismic inversion with hybrid training and uncertainty analysis , 2021, GEOPHYSICS.

[6]  Jinghuai Gao,et al.  Optimization-inspired deep learning high-resolution inversion for seismic data , 2021 .

[7]  D. Colombo,et al.  Physics-driven deep-learning inversion with application to transient electromagnetics , 2021 .

[8]  Yang Liu,et al.  Automatic seismic facies interpretation using supervised deep learning , 2020 .

[9]  Jinfeng Li,et al.  Fast imaging of time-domain airborne EM data using deep learning technology , 2020 .

[10]  A. Abubakar,et al.  Application of supervised descent method for 2D magnetotelluric data inversion , 2020 .

[11]  Weichang Li,et al.  Deep-learning electromagnetic monitoring coupled to fluid flow simulators , 2020 .

[12]  Peng Jiang,et al.  Deep Learning Inversion of Electrical Resistivity Data , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Alessandro Santilano,et al.  Particle swarm optimization of 2D magnetotelluric data , 2019, GEOPHYSICS.

[14]  Jianwei Ma,et al.  Deep-learning inversion: a next generation seismic velocity-model building method , 2019, GEOPHYSICS.

[15]  Maarten V. de Hoop,et al.  Random mesh projectors for inverse problems , 2018, ICLR.

[16]  Haijiang Zhang,et al.  Three-dimensional magnetotelluric imaging of the geothermal system beneath the Gonghe Basin, Northeast Tibetan Plateau , 2018, Geothermics.

[17]  Stan E. Dosso,et al.  Efficient hierarchical trans-dimensional Bayesian inversion of magnetotelluric data , 2018 .

[18]  G. Egbert,et al.  Electrical conductivity structure of southeastern North America: Implications for lithospheric architecture and Appalachian topographic rejuvenation , 2017 .

[19]  Changchun Yin,et al.  3D inversion for multipulse airborne transient electromagnetic data , 2016 .

[20]  Xuefeng Zhao,et al.  Mapping the Geothermal System Using AMT and MT in the Mapamyum (QP) Field, Lake Manasarovar, Southwestern Tibet , 2016 .

[21]  M. Uyeshima,et al.  Electrical image of subduction zone beneath northeastern Japan , 2015 .

[22]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[23]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[24]  Y. Ogawa,et al.  Three-dimensional magnetotelluric imaging of crustal fluids and seismicity around Naruko volcano, NE Japan , 2014, Earth, Planets and Space.

[25]  Adam Schultz,et al.  Deep electrical resistivity structure of the northwestern U.S. derived from 3-D inversion of USArray magnetotelluric data , 2014 .

[26]  Gary D. Egbert,et al.  ModEM: A modular system for inversion of electromagnetic geophysical data , 2014, Comput. Geosci..

[27]  Yin Chang Trans-dimensional Bayesian inversion of frequency-domain airborne EM data , 2014 .

[28]  Gary D. Egbert,et al.  Computational recipes for electromagnetic inverse problems , 2012 .

[29]  W. Siripunvaraporn,et al.  An efficient data space conjugate gradient Occam's method for three‐dimensional magnetotelluric inversion , 2011 .

[30]  Yangyang Di Inversion of noisy data by probabilistic methodology , 2008 .

[31]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Visualizing Data using t-SNE , 2008 .

[32]  C. Yin,et al.  Simulated Annealing for Airborne EM Inversion , 2007 .

[33]  J. Verdon,et al.  European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers , 2007 .

[34]  Steven Constable,et al.  Inversion of magnetotelluric data for 2D structure with sharp resistivity contrasts , 2004 .

[35]  Takao Kobayashi,et al.  A-scope analysis of subsurface radar sounding of lunar mare region , 2002 .

[36]  G. Newman,et al.  Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using non-linear conjugate gradients , 2000 .

[37]  Lutz Prechelt,et al.  Early Stopping-But When? , 1996, Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade.

[38]  R. Parker,et al.  Occam's inversion; a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data , 1987 .