Pseudo progression identification of glioblastoma with dictionary learning

OBJECTIVE Although the use of temozolomide in chemoradiotherapy is effective, the challenging clinical problem of pseudo progression has been raised in brain tumor treatment. This study aims to distinguish pseudo progression from true progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2000 and 2012, a total of 161 patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) were treated with chemoradiotherapy at our hospital. Among the patients, 79 had their diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data acquired at the earliest diagnosed date of pseudo progression or true progression, and 23 had both DTI data and genomic data. Clinical records of all patients were kept in good condition. Volumetric fractional anisotropy (FA) images obtained from the DTI data were decomposed into a sequence of sparse representations. Then, a feature selection algorithm was applied to extract the critical features from the feature matrix to reduce the size of the feature matrix and to improve the classification accuracy. RESULTS The proposed approach was validated using the 79 samples with clinical DTI data. Satisfactory results were obtained under different experimental conditions. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was 0.87 for a given dictionary with 1024 atoms. For the subgroup of 23 samples, genomics data analysis was also performed. Results implied further perspective on pseudo progression classification. CONCLUSIONS The proposed method can determine pseudo progression and true progression with improved accuracy. Laboring segmentation is no longer necessary because this skillfully designed method is not sensitive to tumor location.

[1]  D. Born,et al.  Pseudoprogression: Relevance With Respect to Treatment of High-Grade Gliomas , 2011, Current treatment options in oncology.

[2]  Yankai Xia,et al.  ERCC1 and ERCC2 polymorphisms and risk of idiopathic azoospermia in a Chinese population. , 2008, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[3]  Dieta Brandsma,et al.  Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[4]  Michael Elad,et al.  Compression of facial images using the K-SVD algorithm , 2008, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[5]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Investigating machine learning techniques for MRI-based classification of brain neoplasms , 2011, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[6]  Xiaobo Zhou,et al.  A novel missense-mutation-related feature extraction scheme for 'driver' mutation identification , 2012, Bioinform..

[7]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Learning with Kernels: support vector machines, regularization, optimization, and beyond , 2001, Adaptive computation and machine learning series.

[8]  A G Sorensen,et al.  Pseudoprogression and Pseudoresponse: Imaging Challenges in the Assessment of Posttreatment Glioma , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[9]  P Van Tassel,et al.  Malignant gliomas: MR imaging spectrum of radiation therapy- and chemotherapy-induced necrosis of the brain after treatment. , 2000, Radiology.

[10]  E. Shaw,et al.  Radiation oncology in brain tumors: current approaches and clinical trials in progress. , 2010, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[11]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[12]  M. Elad,et al.  Improving the k-svd facial image compression using a linear deblocking method , 2008, 2008 IEEE 25th Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel.

[13]  R. Gonzalez,et al.  Clinical and radiographic features of peritumoral infarction following resection of glioblastoma , 2006, Neurology.

[14]  J. Yeatman,et al.  Diffusion Tensor Imaging: A Review for Pediatric Researchers and Clinicians , 2010, Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP.

[15]  Michael Elad,et al.  Sparse Representation for Color Image Restoration , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[16]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[17]  M. J. van den Bent,et al.  Immediate post-radiotherapy changes in malignant glioma can mimic tumor progression , 2004, Neurology.

[18]  A. Friedman,et al.  Monitoring Radiographic Brain Tumor Progression , 2011, Toxins.

[19]  Kristin R. Swanson,et al.  Response classification based on a minimal model of glioblastoma growth is prognostic for clinical outcomes and distinguishes progression from pseudoprogression. , 2013, Cancer research.

[20]  Rajan Jain,et al.  Morphologic MRI features, diffusion tensor imaging and radiation dosimetric analysis to differentiate pseudo-progression from early tumor progression , 2013, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[21]  Stephen T. C. Wong,et al.  Support vector machine multiparametric MRI identification of pseudoprogression from tumor recurrence in patients with resected glioblastoma , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  K. Aldape,et al.  ERCC1 and ERCC2 polymorphisms and adult glioma. , 2005, Neuro-oncology.

[23]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL , 2009, NeuroImage.

[24]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[25]  J. Henson,et al.  Brain Tumor Imaging in Clinical Trials , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[26]  Michael Elad,et al.  Image Denoising Via Sparse and Redundant Representations Over Learned Dictionaries , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[27]  Thomas L Chenevert,et al.  Differentiation of recurrent brain tumor versus radiation injury using diffusion tensor imaging in patients with new contrast-enhancing lesions. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[28]  Gordon K. Smyth,et al.  Use of within-array replicate spots for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments , 2005, Bioinform..

[29]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Decoding global gene expression programs in liver cancer by noninvasive imaging , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.