Segregation of plum and pluot cultivars according to their organoleptic characteristics

Cultivar segregation according to the sensory perception of their organoleptic characteristics was attempted by using trained panel data evaluated by principal component analysis of 12 plum and four pluot cultivars as a part of our program to understand plum minimum quality. The perception of the four sensory attributes (sweetness, sourness, plum flavor intensity, plum aroma intensity) was reduced to three principal components, which accounted for 98.6% of the variation in the sensory attributes of the tested cultivars. Using the Ward separation method and PCA analysis (PC1 = 49.8% and PC2 = 25.6%), plum and pluot cultivars were segregated into groups (tart, plum aroma, and sweet/plum flavor) with similar sensory attributes. Fruit source significantly affected cultivar ripe soluble solids concentration (RSSC) and ripe titratable acidity (RTA), but it did not significantly affect sensory perception of plum flavor intensity, sourness, sweetness, and plum aroma intensity by the trained panel on fruit harvested above their physiological maturity. Based on this information, we recommend that validation of these organoleptic groups should be conducted using “in store” consumer tests prior to development of a minimum quality index within each organoleptic group based on ripe soluble solids concentration (RSSC). This organoleptic cultivar classification will help to match consumer preferences and enhance current promotion and marketing programs.

[1]  Carlos H. Crisosto,et al.  Consumer acceptance of ‘Brooks’ and ‘Bing’ cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual skin color , 2003 .

[2]  M. Taylor,et al.  Effect of storage regimes on pectolytic enzymes, pectic substances, internal conductivity and gel breakdown in cold stored ‘Songold’ plums , 1994 .

[3]  J. H. Ward.  Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .

[4]  F. Mitchell,et al.  Influence of cooling and temperature maintenance on the quality of California grown stone fruit , 1987 .

[5]  C. Crisosto,et al.  Susceptibility to Chilling Injury of Peach, Nectarine, and Plum Cultivars Grown in California , 1999 .

[6]  J. Wells,et al.  Disorders in plum, peach, and nectarine shipments to the New York Market, 1972-1985 , 1987 .

[7]  R. Wills,et al.  Nutrient composition of stone fruit (Prunus spp.) cultivars: apricot, cherry, nectarine, peach and plum. , 1983, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[8]  Marta Serrano-Megías,et al.  Application of agglomerative hierarchical clustering to identify consumer tomato preferences: influence of physicochemical and sensory characteristics on consumer response , 2006 .

[9]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices , 1998 .

[10]  C. Crisosto,et al.  Understanding American and Chinese consumer acceptance of ‘Redglobe’ table grapes , 2002 .

[11]  J. Mattheis,et al.  Ripening and quality of 'Laetitia' plums following harvest and cold storage as affected by inhibition of ethylene action , 2003 .

[12]  M. Taylor,et al.  Physiological factors associated with overripeness, internal breakdown and gel breakdown in plums stored at low temperature , 1993 .

[13]  E. Macrae,et al.  Acidity and taste in kiwifruit , 2004 .

[14]  A. Waterhouse,et al.  HPLC-DAD-ESIMS analysis of phenolic compounds in nectarines, peaches, and plums. , 2001, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[15]  H. Plich.  The effect of storage conditions and date of picking on storability and quality of some plum (Prunus domestica L.) fruit cultivars , 1999 .

[16]  P. Holford,et al.  Responses of climacteric and suppressed-climacteric plums to treatment with propylene and 1-methylcyclopropene , 1998 .

[17]  M. Taylor,et al.  Effect of harvest maturity on pectic substances, internal conductivity, soluble solids and gel breakdown in cold stored ‘Songold’ plums , 1995 .

[18]  A. Liverani,et al.  INCREASING FRUIT QUALITY OF PEACHES AND NECTARINES: THE MAIN GOALS OF ISF-FO (ITALY) , 2002 .

[19]  Theodore M. DeJong,et al.  Orchard factors affecting postharvest stone fruit quality , 1995 .

[20]  M. Amerine,et al.  Chemical and sensory variability in table grapes , 1963 .

[21]  Carlos H. Crisosto,et al.  Understanding consumer acceptance of early harvested 'Hayward' kiwifruit , 2001 .

[22]  C. Crisosto,et al.  Increasing 'Blackamber' plum (Prunus salicina Lindell) consumer acceptance , 2004 .

[23]  C. Crisosto,et al.  Segregation of peach and nectarine (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) cultivars according to their organoleptic characteristics , 2006 .

[24]  F. Kappel,et al.  Fruit Characteristics and Sensory Attributes of an Ideal Sweet Cherry , 1996 .

[25]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Sensory Evaluation of Food , 1999 .

[26]  Jerome J. Workman,et al.  Near-infrared spectroscopy in agriculture , 2004 .