The impact of contingencies on management accounting system development

Four hypotheses relevant to the contingency theory of management accounting are presented. Data relate to the period 1994–98 for a sample of new Scottish microfirms. First, correlation analysis is applied to test the hypothesis that the introduction of management accounting system (MAS) developments is related to the timing of contingent events such as cashflow crises, shortfalls of finance, and innovation. Second, cluster analysis is used to test the hypothesis that contingencies cluster to form three configurations of small firms, adaptive, running blind, and stagnant. Third, regression analysis is used to test the hypothesis that an index of organizational form, measured by weighted headcount, is explained by aspects of the generic contingencies, technological uncertainty, production systems, business strategy and market environment. The fourth hypothesis is that MAS complexity is determined by sub-unit interdependence, market dynamics, and work methods. The four hypotheses tested support several aspects of contingency theory, as modified to a small firms context.

[1]  S. Anderson,et al.  Economic transition, strategy and the evolution of management accounting practices: the case of India , 1999 .

[2]  Alnoor Bhimani,et al.  Mapping methodological frontiers in cross-national management control research , 1999 .

[3]  S. Brignall,et al.  A contingent rationale for cost system design in services , 1997 .

[4]  Manzurul Alam,et al.  Budgetary process in uncertain contexts: a study of state-owned enterprises in Bangladesh , 1997 .

[5]  Louise Kloot,et al.  Organizational learning and management control systems: responding to environmental change , 1997 .

[6]  Christopher S. Chapman,et al.  Reflections on a contingent view of accounting , 1997 .

[7]  Kim Langfield-Smith,et al.  Management control systems and strategy: A critical review☆ , 1997 .

[8]  D. Otley,et al.  Accounting for Management Control , 1990 .

[9]  L. Vogel,et al.  Strategy and Structure , 1986 .

[10]  C. S. Jones,et al.  An empirical study of the evidence for contingency theories of management accounting systems in conditions of rapid change , 1985 .

[11]  D. Otley.  The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis , 1980 .

[12]  John H. Waterhouse,et al.  A contingency framework for management accounting systems research , 1978 .

[13]  Lawrence A. Gordon,et al.  A contingency framework for the design of accounting information systems , 1976 .

[14]  Danny Miller,et al.  TOWARDS A CONTINGENCY THEORY OF STRATEGY FORMULATION. , 1975 .

[15]  W. Bruns,et al.  BUDGETARY CONTROL AND ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE , 1975 .

[16]  Joan C. Woodward,et al.  Industrial Organisation: Theory and Practice , 1966 .

[17]  Joan C. Woodward.  Management and technology , 1958 .