Managing collapsed boundaries in global work

Global workers have long contended with the challenges of working across geographical, temporal, and cultural boundaries enabled by communication technologies. However, the global work research has rarely intersected with the literature on work–home boundary management—which has been brought to the forefront due to the forced move to remote work during the Covid-19 pandemic. Drawing on a qualitative field study of 55 in-depth interviews with global workers from a large organization headquartered in the Nordics, we found that global workers drew on sociomaterial affordances to manage both global work and work–home boundaries through strategies of boundary support and boundary collapse. Although the shift to remote work created challenges due to boundary collapse, it presented new spatiotemporal affordances that led to unexpected benefits for both global work and work–life boundary management. The findings have implications for global work, remote work, and the future of work more broadly.

[1]  A. Sivunen,et al.  Staying connected and feeling less exhausted: The autonomy benefits of after‐hour connectivity , 2023, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.

[2]  A. Sivunen,et al.  WHY PEOPLE ENGAGE IN SUPPLEMENTAL WORK: THE ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY, RESPONSE EXPECTATIONS, AND COMMUNICATION PERSISTENCE , 2021, Journal of Organizational Behavior.

[3]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  Understanding orientations to participation: overcoming status differences to foster engagement in global teams , 2021, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology.

[4]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  Exploring the discursive construction of subgroups in global virtual teams , 2020 .

[5]  Ward van Zoonen,et al.  Understanding constant connectivity to work: How and for whom is constant connectivity related to employee well-being? , 2020, Inf. Organ..

[6]  R. Choudhari,et al.  COVID 19 pandemic: Mental health challenges of internal migrant workers of India , 2020, Asian Journal of Psychiatry.

[7]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Work Design for Global Professionals: Connectivity demands, connectivity behaviors, and their effects on psychological and behavioral outcomes , 2020, Organization Studies.

[8]  Dave Cook,et al.  The freedom trap: digital nomads and the use of disciplining practices to manage work/leisure boundaries , 2020, Information Technology & Tourism.

[9]  Ellen Scully-Russ,et al.  The Changing Nature and Organization of Work: An Integrative Review of the Literature , 2020, Human Resource Development Review.

[10]  Beverly Y Thompson,et al.  The Digital Nomad Lifestyle: (Remote) Work/Leisure Balance, Privilege, and Constructed Community , 2018, International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure.

[11]  A. McDowall,et al.  Voluntary Work‐Related Technology Use During Non‐Work Time: A Narrative Synthesis of Empirical Research and Research Agenda , 2018 .

[12]  Elizabeth D. Wilhoit.  ‘My drive is my sacred time’: commuting as routine liminality , 2017 .

[13]  Matthew M Piszczek,et al.  Boundary control and controlled boundaries: Organizational expectations for technology use at the work–family interface , 2017 .

[14]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Organizational Media Affordances: Operationalization and Associations with Media Use , 2017 .

[15]  Pamela Lirio.  Global boundary work tactics: managing work and family transitions in a 24–7 global context , 2017 .

[16]  Daantje Derks,et al.  Work-related smartphone use, work–family conflict and family role performance: The role of segmentation preference , 2016 .

[17]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  The Use of Enterprise Social Network Sites for Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Organizations , 2015 .

[18]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Language as a lightning rod: Power contests, emotion regulation, and subgroup dynamics in global teams , 2013, Journal of International Business Studies.

[19]  Julia Eisenberg,et al.  Overcoming the "Ideology of Openness": Probing the Affordances of Social Media for Organizational Knowledge Sharing , 2013, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[20]  M. Scott.  “Communicate Through the Roof”: A Case Study Analysis of the Communicative Rules and Resources of an Effective Global Virtual Team , 2013 .

[21]  P. Leonardi,et al.  Social Media Use in Organizations: Exploring the Affordances of Visibility, Editability, Persistence, and Association , 2013 .

[22]  Sarah J. Tracy.  The Toxic and Mythical Combination of a Deductive Writing Logic for Inductive Qualitative Research , 2012 .

[23]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Perceived discontinuities and constructed continuities in virtual work , 2011, Inf. Syst. J..

[24]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Putting the Global in Global Work: An Intercultural Lens on the Practice of Cross-National Collaboration , 2011 .

[25]  Stephen R. Barley,et al.  E-mail as a Source and Symbol of Stress , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[26]  Stacey M. B. Wieland.  Struggling to Manage Work as a Part of Everyday Life: Complicating Control, Rethinking Resistance, and Contextualizing Work/Life Studies , 2011 .

[27]  Sharon F. Matusik,et al.  Embracing or embattled by converged mobile devices? Users’ experiences with a contemporary connectivity technology , 2011 .

[28]  M. Maznevski,et al.  A look at the bright side of multicultural team diversity , 2010 .

[29]  Glen E. Kreiner,et al.  BALANCING BORDERS AND BRIDGES: NEGOTIATING THE WORK-HOME INTERFACE VIA BOUNDARY WORK TACTICS , 2009 .

[30]  Jennifer L. Gibbs.  Dialectics in a global software team: Negotiating tensions across time, space, and culture , 2009 .

[31]  Takao Maruyama,et al.  A Multivariate Analysis of Work–Life Balance Outcomes from a Large-Scale Telework Programme , 2009 .

[32]  J. Wajcman,et al.  Families without Borders: Mobile Phones, Connectedness and Work-Home Divisions , 2008 .

[33]  Jean Wilson,et al.  Perceived Proximity in Virtual Work: Explaining the Paradox of Far-but-Close , 2008 .

[34]  Kara L. Orvis,et al.  Situation Invisibility and Attribution in Distributed Collaborations , 2007 .

[35]  Anne-Laure Fayard,et al.  Photocopiers and Water-coolers: The Affordances of Informal Interaction , 2007 .

[36]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of , 2022 .

[37]  Anu Sivunen,et al.  Strengthening Identification with the Team in Virtual Teams: The Leaders' Perspective , 2006 .

[38]  Patrice M. Buzzanell,et al.  Telecommuting as viewed through cultural lenses: an empirical investigation of the discourses of utopia, identity, and mystery , 2002 .

[39]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Discontinuities and continuities: a new way to understand virtual work , 2002, Inf. Technol. People.

[40]  Ian Hutchby,et al.  Technologies, Texts and Affordances , 2001 .

[41]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  All in a Day'S Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions , 2000 .

[42]  S. Clark.  Work/Family Border Theory: A New Theory of Work/Family Balance , 2000 .

[43]  Karen K. Myers,et al.  Visibility in Open Workspaces: Implications for Organizational Identification , 2022 .

[44]  Jessica Vitak,et al.  Explicating Affordances: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research , 2017, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[45]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  SUBGROUP DYNAMICS IN INTERNATIONALLY DISTRIBUTED TEAMS: ETHNOCENTRISM OR CROSS-NATIONAL LEARNING? , 2004 .

[46]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[47]  V. Braun,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Qualitative Research in Psychology Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology , 2022 .