Design of the incentive mechanism in electricity auction market based on the signaling game theory

At present, designing a proper bidding mechanism to decrease the generators' market power is considered to be one of the key approaches to deepen the reform of the electricity market. Based on the signaling game theory, the paper analyzes the main electricity bidding mechanisms in the electricity auction markets and considers the degree of information disturbance as an important factor for evaluating bidding mechanisms. Under the above studies, an incentive electricity bidding mechanism defined as the Generator Semi-randomized Matching (GSM) mechanism is proposed. In order to verify the new bidding mechanism, this paper uses the Swarm platform to develop a simulation model based on the multi-agents. In the simulation model, the generators and purchasers use the partly superior study strategy to adjust their price and their electricity quantity. Then, the paper examines a simulation experiment of the GSM bidding mechanism and compares it to a simulation of the High-Low Matching (HLM) bidding mechanism. According to the simulation results, several conclusions can be drawn when comparing the proposed GSM bidding mechanism to the equilibrium state of HLM: the clearing price decreases, the total transaction volume increases, the profits of electricity generators decreases, and the overall benefits of purchasers increases.

[1]  Tang Hao-yang Swarm Simulation on High-low Matching Auction Mechanism Based on Secondary Trade of Bilateral Contract , 2007 .

[2]  Bart J. Wilson,et al.  Using Experiments to Inform the Privatization/Deregulation Movement in Electricity , 2002 .

[3]  D. Druce Modelling the transition from cost-based to bid-based pricing in a deregulated electricity-market , 2007 .

[4]  Liu Haoming Research on Modeling the Incentive Bidding Mechanism for Transmission and Distribution Separated Electricity Markets , 2006 .

[5]  Daniel J. Veit,et al.  A Critical Survey of Agent-Based Wholesale Electricity Market Models , 2008 .

[6]  Udi Helman,et al.  Market power monitoring and mitigation in the US wholesale power markets , 2006 .

[7]  F. Stacke,et al.  A Combined Pool/Bilateral/Reserve Electricity Market Operating Under Pay-as-Bid Pricing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  Nima Amjady,et al.  Multiobjective clearing of reactive power market in deregulated power systems , 2009 .

[9]  F. Banks Economics of electricity deregulation and privatization: An introductory survey , 1996 .

[10]  Daniel Veit,et al.  An Agent-Based Analysis of the German Electricity Market with Transmission Capacity Constraints , 2009 .

[11]  P. Flynn,et al.  Deregulated power prices: comparison of diurnal patterns , 2004 .

[12]  R. Baldick,et al.  Short-term electricity market auction game analysis: uniform and pay-as-bid pricing , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  Xiaoyan Zou,et al.  Double-sided auction mechanism design in electricity based on maximizing social welfare , 2009 .

[14]  Chen Jian Swarm-Based Aggregation Model and Simulation of Multi-Agent in Supply Chain , 2004 .

[15]  Sun Zheng-yun APPLICATION OF HIGH-LOW MATCH METHODS TO REGIONAL ELECTRICITY MARKET CONSIDERING TRANSACTION COSTS , 2005 .

[16]  Sven-Olof Fridolfsson,et al.  Market Power in the Nordic Electricity Wholesale Market: A Survey of the Empirical Evidence , 2008 .

[17]  Cristian Carraretto,et al.  Power plant operation and management in a deregulated market , 2006 .

[18]  Zhao Yang Dong,et al.  Composite auction method for suppressing unreasonable electricity price spikes in a competitive electricity market , 2005 .

[19]  P. Flynn,et al.  Electricity deregulation, spot price patterns and demand-side management , 2006 .

[20]  Yan Mao-song Currently Used Uniform Clearing Pricing Auction Facilitates the Generators' Tacit Collusion——Mechanism Analysis , 2005 .

[21]  S. Okuma,et al.  Multi-agent based experiments on uniform price and pay-as-bid electricity auction markets , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation, Restructuring and Power Technologies. Proceedings.