Variation in the Use of Vestibular Diagnostic Testing for Patients Presenting to Otolaryngology Clinics with Dizziness

Objective We used a national otolaryngology practice–based research network database to characterize the utilization of vestibular function testing in patients diagnosed with dizziness and/or a vestibular disorder. Study Design Database review. Setting The Creating Healthcare Excellence through Education and Research (CHEER) practice-based research network of academic and community providers Subjects and Methods Dizzy patients in the CHEER retrospective database were identified through ICD-9 codes; vestibular testing procedures were identified with CPT codes. Demographics and procedures per patient were tabulated. Analysis included number and type of vestibular tests ordered, stratified by individual clinic and by practice type (community vs academic). Chi-square tests were performed to assess if the percentage of patients receiving testing was statistically significant across clinics. A logistic regression model was used to examine the association between receipt of testing and being tested on initial visit. Results A total of 12,468 patients diagnosed with dizziness and/or a vestibular disorder were identified from 7 community and 5 academic CHEER network clinics across the country. One-fifth of these patients had at least 1 vestibular function test. The percentage of patients tested varied widely by site, from 3% to 72%; academic clinics were twice as likely to test. Initial visit vestibular testing also varied, from 0% to 96% of dizzy patients, and was 15 times more likely in academic clinics. Conclusion There is significant variation in use and timing of vestibular diagnostic testing across otolaryngology clinics. The CHEER network research database does not contain outcome data. These results illustrate the critical need for research that examines outcomes as related to vestibular testing.

[1]  A. Abernethy,et al.  Variations in use of PET among Medicare beneficiaries with non-small cell lung cancer, 1998-2007. , 2013, Radiology.

[2]  M. Dieterich,et al.  Who is at risk for ongoing dizziness and psychological strain after a vestibular disorder? , 2009, Neuroscience.

[3]  Michael C Schubert,et al.  Disorders of balance and vestibular function in US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2004. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[4]  M. Beutel,et al.  Dizziness: anxiety, health care utilization and health behavior--results from a representative German community survey. , 2009, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[5]  P. Heagerty,et al.  Multi-Modality Mediastinal Staging for Lung Cancer Among Medicare Beneficiaries , 2009, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[6]  G. Jacobson,et al.  Significant vestibular system impairment is common in a cohort of elderly patients referred for assessment of falls risk. , 2008, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[7]  Thomas Lempert,et al.  Burden of dizziness and vertigo in the community. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[8]  Elliott S Fisher,et al.  Discretionary decision making by primary care physicians and the cost of U.S. Health care. , 2008, Health affairs.

[9]  H. Neuhauser Epidemiology of vertigo , 2007, Current opinion in neurology.

[10]  J. Staab,et al.  Chronic dizziness and anxiety: effect of course of illness on treatment outcome. , 2005, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[11]  R. Stafford,et al.  Variation in routine electrocardiogram use in academic primary care practice. , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[12]  K Kroenke,et al.  How Common Are Various Causes of Dizziness?: A Critical Review , 2000, Southern medical journal.

[13]  I. Nazareth,et al.  Prevalence and presentation of dizziness in a general practice community sample of working age people. , 1998, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[14]  R. Keller,et al.  The association between local diagnostic testing intensity and invasive cardiac procedures. , 1996, JAMA.