Know-how to lead digital transformation: The case of local governments

Abstract Local governments are in an ideal position to integrate government, private, and citizen data to deliver beneficial new digitally enabled public services. However, progress toward achieving the benefits has stagnated in many cases. This is because managers lack the requisite know-how to lead the implementation and enactment of integrated enterprise systems to improve the processes of public service delivery, part of a journey called ‘digital transformation’. If digital transformations are to progress, we need more nuanced empirical elaboration of the know-how managers require. To that end, this study reports evidence from case studies in 11 local governments in Canada. The findings provide the empirical basis for a theory of the know-how managers require to lead the implementation and enactment of integrated enterprise systems in support of digital transformation. We then propose a new theoretical model of how to transfer that requisite know-how to managers through public-private partnerships, and thereby mitigate barriers to that transfer.

[1]  Mohamed Mahmood,et al.  Enhancing Citizens' Trust and Confidence in Government through Digital Transformation , 2016, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[2]  Yajiong Xue,et al.  Information Technology Governance in Information Technology Investment Decision Processes: The Impact of Investment Characteristics, External Environment, and Internal Context , 2008, MIS Q..

[3]  J. Millard,et al.  Mapping Smart Cities in the EU , 2014 .

[4]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Towards a smart State? Inter-agency collaboration, information integration, and beyond , 2012, Inf. Polity.

[5]  M. Lewis,et al.  Are Public-Private Partnerships a Healthy Option? A Systematic Literature Review , 2014, Social science & medicine.

[6]  Ines Mergel,et al.  Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews , 2019, Gov. Inf. Q..

[7]  Manuel Pérez Cota,et al.  From the quality of traditional services to the quality of local e-Government online services: A literature review , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[8]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Knowledge sharing in cross-boundary information system development in the public sector , 2006, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[9]  Sarmad Alshawi,et al.  A leadership model for e-government transformation , 2007 .

[10]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , 1999 .

[11]  Hamed Qahri Saremi,et al.  Motivating CIO Advice Networking to Improve Firm Performance , 2018, HICSS.

[12]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Three Knowledge Management Strategies: Knowledge Hierarchies, Knowledge Markets, and Knowledge Communities , 2005, MIS Q. Executive.

[13]  Frank Bannister,et al.  The great theory hunt: Does e-government really have a problem? , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework , 2012, HICSS.

[15]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Digital government transformation and internet portals: The co-evolution of technology, organizations, and institutions , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[16]  S. Hofmann,et al.  Different But Still The Same? How Public And Private Sector Organisations Deal with New Digital Competences , 2018 .

[17]  Elizabeth J. Davidson,et al.  Unity in Diversity: Electronic Patient Record Use in Multidisciplinary Practice , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  M. Visser,et al.  Learning in Public Sector Organizations: A Theory of Action Approach , 2016 .

[19]  Donald F. Norris,et al.  Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e‐government at the municipal level * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[20]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Creating a Strategic IT Architecture Competency: Learning in Stages , 2003, MIS Q. Executive.

[21]  Christina Fang,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation through Structural Design: The Isolation of Subgroups and Organization Learning , 2008 .

[22]  Guy Paré,et al.  Toward a New Theory of the Contribution of the IT Function in Organizations , 2012, MIS Q..

[23]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Digital Transformation Strategies , 2015, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[24]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Options for Formulating a Digital Transformation Strategy , 2020, MIS Q. Executive.

[25]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Government inter-organizational information sharing initiatives: Understanding the main determinants of success , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[26]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Creating social entrepreneurship in local government , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  R. Hambleton From the smart city to the wise city: The role of universities in place-based leadership , 2014 .

[28]  Christopher N. Chapman,et al.  Reexamining Threat Rigidity: Implications for Design , 2009 .

[29]  Yongbin Wei,et al.  Factors of stickiness in transfers of know-how between MNC units , 2012, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[30]  R. Kitchin,et al.  Making sense of smart cities: addressing present shortcomings , 2015 .

[31]  Mateusz Dolata,et al.  Facilitating Digital Transformation through Education: A Case Study in the Public Administration , 2020, HICSS.

[32]  C. Gersick REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM , 1991 .

[33]  Moaman Al-Busaidy,et al.  Digitally-enabled service transformation in the public sector: The lure of institutional pressure and strategic response towards change , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[34]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  Convergence and Upheaval: Managing the Unsteady Pace of Organizational Evolution , 1986 .

[35]  Alexander Benlian,et al.  Reinventing the IT function: the Role of IT Agility and IT Ambidexterity in Supporting Digital Business Transformation , 2017, ECIS.

[36]  Bryan D. Jones,et al.  From There to Here: Punctuated Equilibrium to the General Punctuation Thesis to a Theory of Government Information Processing , 2012 .

[37]  Luiz Antonio Joia,et al.  Towards a heuristic frame for transferring e-government technology , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[38]  Andrea Resca,et al.  Reappraising maturity models in e-Government research: The trajectory-turning point theory , 2019, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Social Contagion and Information Technology Diffusion: The Adoption of Electronic Medical Records in U.S. Hospitals , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[40]  Tomasz Janowski,et al.  Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[41]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[42]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty , 1997 .

[43]  Bram Klievink,et al.  Realizing joined-up government - Dynamic capabilities and stage models for transformation , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[44]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  Information systems in the public sector: The e-Government enactment framework , 2010, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Gregory Vial,et al.  Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda , 2019, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Investigating organizational learning in eGovernment projects: A multi-theoretic approach , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Sangeeta Shah Bharadwaj,et al.  Building a successful relationship in business process outsourcing: an exploratory study , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[48]  Dovev Lavie,et al.  Organizational Differences, Relational Mechanisms, and Alliance Performance , 2012 .

[49]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[50]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  ERP systems implementation: best practices in Canadian government organizations , 2002, Gov. Inf. Q..

[51]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Training, Technical Complexity, and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation , 2007, MIS Q..

[52]  E. Guba,et al.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1989 .

[53]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Managing IT-enabled transformation in the public sector: A case study on e-government in South Korea , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[54]  Michael R. Wade,et al.  An Exploration of Organizational Level Information Systems Discontinuance Intentions , 2011, MIS Q..

[55]  W. Orlikowski Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[56]  Gilles Paquet,et al.  E-Governance & government on-line in Canada: Partnerships, people & prospects , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[57]  Alfred A. Marcus,et al.  EMBEDDED TIES AND THE ACQUISITION OF COMPETITIVE CAPABILITIES , 2005 .

[58]  Zahir Irani,et al.  E-government implementation: A bird’s eye view of issues relating to costs, opportunities, benefits and risks , 2013, Information Systems Frontiers.

[59]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Explaining information systems change: a punctuated socio-technical change model , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[60]  Keld Pedersen eGovernment in Local Government: Challenges and Capabilities , 2016 .

[61]  Leiser Silva,et al.  Fighting Against Windmills: Strategic Information Systems and Organizational Deep Structures , 2007, MIS Q..

[62]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[63]  Gerard George,et al.  Rethinking Governance in Management Research , 2014 .

[64]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Getting by with the Advice of Their Friends: CEOs' Advice Networks and Firms' Strategic Responses to Poor Performance , 2003 .

[65]  InduShobha N. Chengalur-Smith,et al.  Collaborative e-Government: impediments and benefits of information-sharing projects in the public sector , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[66]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  The Dynamics of Alignment: Insights from a Punctuated Equilibrium Model , 2001 .

[67]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Business process management capabilities in local governments: A multi-method study , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[68]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: A capability perspective , 2018, Inf. Syst. J..

[69]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Rapid Adaptation in Digital Transformation: A Participatory Process for Engaging IS and Business Leaders , 2011, MIS Q. Executive.

[70]  Ali R. Montazemi,et al.  Seeking the 'Smart' in Cities: Managing the process of Innovating with IT , 2018, AMCIS.

[71]  M. Miles,et al.  The Qualitative Researcher's Companion , 2002 .

[72]  R. Hirschheim,et al.  Detours in the Path toward Strategic Information Systems Alignment , 2001 .

[73]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Analyzing the role of stakeholders in the adoption of technology integration solutions in UK local government: An exploratory study , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[74]  M. Brown,et al.  Understanding E-Government Benefits , 2007 .

[75]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Structurational analysis of e-government initiatives: a case study of SCO , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[76]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Transformational change and business process reengineering (BPR): Lessons from the British and Dutch public sector , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[77]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[78]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[79]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Making e-Government systems workable: Exploring the evolution of frames , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[80]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[81]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Digital transformation strategy making in pre-digital organizations: The case of a financial services provider , 2019, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..