A Mechanistic Account of Stress-Induced Performance Degradation

[1]  The Impact of Stress on Cognition and Motivation , 2019, Frontiers Research Topics.

[2]  Ron Sun,et al.  Two Models of Moral Judgment. , 2018, Cognitive science.

[3]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Attentional Capture by Simultaneous Pleasant and Unpleasant Emotional Distractors , 2018, Emotion.

[4]  Debbie M. Yee,et al.  Interactions of motivation and cognitive control , 2018, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[5]  Luiz Pessoa,et al.  Cognitive-Motivational Interactions: Beyond Boxes-and-Arrows Models of the Mind-Brain , 2017, Motivation science.

[6]  Matthew L. Dixon,et al.  The Neural Basis of Motivational Influences on Cognitive Control , 2017, bioRxiv.

[7]  Nicholas R. Wilson,et al.  Emotion: A Unified Mechanistic Interpretation from a Cognitive Architecture , 2016, Cognitive Computation.

[8]  Frank E. Ritter,et al.  Using a cognitive architecture with a physiological substrate to represent effects of a psychological stressor on cognition , 2014, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory.

[9]  Kimberly S. Chiew,et al.  Mechanisms of motivation–cognition interaction: challenges and opportunities , 2014, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[10]  A. Markman,et al.  The Motivation–Cognition Interface in Learning and Decision Making , 2010, Current directions in psychological science.

[11]  Robert C. Mathews,et al.  A Motivationally Based Computational Interpretation of Social Anxiety Induced Stereotype Bias , 2010 .

[12]  Robert C. Mathews,et al.  A motivationally-based simulation of performance degradation under pressure , 2009, Neural Networks.

[13]  Darrell A. Worthy,et al.  What is pressure? Evidence for social pressure as a type of regulatory focus , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Ron Sun,et al.  Motivational Representations within a Computational Cognitive Architecture , 2009, Cognitive Computation.

[15]  M. Eysenck,et al.  Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. , 2007, Emotion.

[16]  A. Pickering,et al.  The New Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory: Implications for Personality Measurement , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[17]  R. Sun,et al.  Exploring the Interaction of Implicit and Explicit Processes to Facilitate Individual Skill Learning , 2005 .

[18]  R. Sun,et al.  The interaction of the explicit and the implicit in skill learning: a dual-process approach. , 2005, Psychological review.

[19]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  More on the fragility of performance: choking under pressure in mathematical problem solving. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  S. Reiss Multifaceted Nature of Intrinsic Motivation: The Theory of 16 Basic Desires , 2004 .

[21]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Motivation, emotion, and cognition: integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development , 2004 .

[22]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Stereotypes as dominant responses: on the "social facilitation" of prejudice in anticipated public contexts. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Ron Sun,et al.  Duality of the Mind , 2002 .

[24]  A. Alao Anatomy of the mind. , 2002, Psychiatric services.

[25]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  On the fragility of skilled performance: what governs choking under pressure? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Prejudice and perception: the role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  M. Ashcraft,et al.  The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  Ron Sun,et al.  From implicit skills to explicit knowledge: a bottom-up model of skill learning , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  G. Hitch,et al.  Separate roles for executive and phonological components of working memory in mental arithmetic , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[30]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  The impact of anxiety on analogical reasoning , 2000 .

[31]  C. Carver,et al.  On the Self-Regulation of Behavior , 1998 .

[32]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[33]  B. P. Lewis,et al.  Thinking about Choking? Attentional Processes and Paradoxical Performance , 1997, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[34]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  An Individual Difference Measure of Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions , 1997 .

[35]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Learning from delayed rewards , 1995, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[36]  福田 博一 State-Trait Anxiety Inventoryによるペインクリニック外来患者の不安の評価 , 1994 .

[37]  A. Reber Implicit learning and tacit knowledge , 1993 .

[38]  L. Jacoby A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[39]  Aaron Sloman,et al.  Motives, Mechanisms, and Emotions , 1987, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[40]  J. Lichtenberg On motivational systems. , 1990, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

[41]  James L. McClelland,et al.  James L. McClelland, David Rumelhart and the PDP Research Group, Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition . Vol. 1. Foundations . Vol. 2. Psychological and biological models . Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press, 1987. , 1989, Journal of Child Language.

[42]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Personality, motivation, and performance: a theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. , 1984, Psychological review.

[43]  D. Navon Resources—a theoretical soup stone? , 1984 .

[44]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[45]  L. Morris,et al.  Relationship of cognitive and emotional components of test anxiety to physiological arousal and academic performance. , 1970, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[46]  R. Zajonc SOCIAL FACILITATION. , 1965, Science.

[47]  R. Yerkes,et al.  The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit‐formation , 1908 .