Flavor trivia and tomato aroma: biochemistry and possible mechanisms for control of important aroma components.

Consumers are often dissatisfied with the flavor of fresh tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) purchased in the supermarket. There are several reasons for this, ranging from poor genetic material to harvest and handling procedures. Research is ongoing to determine the important flavor components in tomato in order to give breeders and molecular biologists access to objective flavor criteria for use in selection of high-quality material. Furthermore, harvest and postharvest handling, and shipping and storage procedures can be analyzed for their effects on important flavor components. FLAVOR TRIVIA To successfully conduct this research, one must first understand what comprises flavor and how it is perceived. The nose has olfactory nerve endings at the back with receptors that bind volatiles emanating from food. These reactions are somewhat analogous to enzyme/ substrate stereochemical associations. Tastes such as sweet, sour, salty, or bitter are perceived because of reactions of sugars or polyalcohols, hydronium ions, sodium ions, glucosides , alkaloids, etc., with receptors located in certain regions of the tongue. The nerves in the tongue can also detect texture, temperature, metallic irritation, bite (carbonation), chemical heat [e.g., hot pepper ( Capsicum fruitescens L.)], etc., collectively known as trigeminal responses. The olfactory system is the more sensitive of the two organs, however, and the most sensitive of the five senses. It can detect odors in parts per trillion whereas receptors on the tongue can detect flavor compounds in parts per hundred. The adverse side of this extreme sensitivity is fatigue, which may be a protective mechanism against nerve damage (DeRovira, 1997). Nevertheless, the fatigue factor must be considered in sensory work with aroma compounds. The extreme sensitivity of the olfactory organ has played an important role in the evolutionary development of mammals, allowing for the odor imprinting involved in olfactory recognition. This has helped in developing behavioral relationships, such as mother-offspring, consort interactions, and general kin recognition, not to mention detection of predator and prey (Margot and Salvadori, 1995; Rouhi, 1996). Specific odors can evoke powerful thoughts and emotions in humans. The sense of smell, therefore, has played a key role in several areas important to species survival. In mammals at least 1000 receptor genes are devoted to encoding receptors that recognize odors; these comprise 1% to 2% of the mammalian genome (Rouhi, 1996). Many factors can affect our perception of flavor, especially the components of flavor made up of aroma compounds. Smelling an aromatic food through the front of the nose may produce a different

[1]  Jun Song,et al.  Application of Solid Phase Microextraction and Gas Chromatography/Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Rapid Analysis of Flavor Volatiles in Tomato and Strawberry Fruits , 1998 .

[2]  A. Maureen Rouhi TRACING SCENTS TO AN ODOR MAP , 1996 .

[3]  E. Baldwin,et al.  Quantitative analysis of flavor parameters in six Florida tomato cultivars (Lycopersicon esculentum mill) , 1991 .

[4]  John E. Thompson,et al.  Lipoxygenase and hydroperoxide lyase activities in ripening tomato fruit , 1996 .

[5]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Altered fruit ripening and leaf senescence in tomatoes expressing an antisense ethylene‐forming enzyme transgene , 1993 .

[6]  P. Oeller,et al.  Reversible inhibition of tomato fruit senescence by antisense RNA. , 1991, Science.

[7]  S. Rothstein,et al.  The Cloning of Two Tomato Lipoxygenase Genes and Their Differential Expression during Fruit Ripening , 1994, Plant physiology.

[8]  R. Buttery,et al.  Quantitative studies on origins of fresh tomato aroma volatiles , 1988 .

[9]  R. Buttery,et al.  TOMATO AROMA COMPONENTS : IDENTIFICATION OF GLYCOSIDE HYDROLYSIS VOLATILES , 1990 .

[10]  A. Theologis Control of ripening , 1994 .

[11]  E. Baldwin,et al.  Aroma Volatile Profiles from Ripe Tomatoes are Influenced by Physiological Maturity at Harvest: An Application for Electronic Nose Technology , 1998 .

[12]  Shangfa Yang,et al.  Ethylene biosynthesis: Identification of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid as an intermediate in the conversion of methionine to ethylene. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  D. Grierson,et al.  Control of ripening , 1993 .

[14]  D. K. Salunkhe,et al.  Metabolism of unsaturated fatty acids in tomato fruit: linoleic and linolenic acid as precursors of hexanal , 1972 .

[15]  G. Tucker,et al.  Fruit Quality Characteristics of Transgenic Tomato Fruit with Altered Polygalacturonase Activity , 1991 .

[16]  R. Buttery,et al.  Fresh tomato volatiles: composition and sensory studies , 1989 .

[17]  T. Galliard,et al.  The enzymic breakdown of lipids to volatile and non‐volatile carbonyl fragments in disrupted tomato fruits , 1977 .

[18]  Philip E. Shaw,et al.  Comparison of volatile flavor components in fresh and processed orange juices , 1990 .

[19]  John W. Scott,et al.  Relationship between Sensory and Instrumental Analysis for Tomato Flavor , 1998 .

[20]  H J Klee,et al.  The never ripe mutation blocks ethylene perception in tomato. , 1994, The Plant cell.

[21]  A. Kader,et al.  Genotypic Variation for Flavor and Composition in Fresh Market Tomatoes1 , 1977, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[22]  D. Grierson,et al.  Antisense gene that inhibits synthesis of the hormone ethylene in transgenic plants , 1990, Nature.

[23]  R. Fischer,et al.  An Antisense Gene Stimulates Ethylene Hormone Production during Tomato Fruit Ripening. , 1992, The Plant cell.

[24]  W. Hiatt,et al.  Postharvest evaluation of transgenic tomatoes with reduced levels of polygalacturonase: processing, firmness and disease resistance , 1992 .

[25]  W. Hiatt,et al.  Reduction of polygalacturonase activity in tomato fruit by antisense RNA. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  R. Buttery,et al.  Flavor compounds. Volatilities in vegetable oil and oil-water mixtures. Estimation of odor thresholds , 1973 .

[27]  R. Buttery,et al.  Fresh tomato aroma volatiles: a quantitative study , 1987 .

[28]  P. John Ethylene biosynthesis: The role of 1‐aminocyclopropane‐1‐carboxylate (ACC) oxidase, and its possible evolutionary origin , 1997 .

[29]  W. Mcglasson,et al.  Influence of the Non-ripening Mutants rin and nor on the Aroma of Tomato Fruit , 1987, HortScience.

[30]  A. Kander Composition and flavor quality of fresh market tomatoes as influenced by some postharvest handling procedures , 1978 .

[31]  N. Harris,et al.  Effect of nitrogen and potassium fertilization on tomato flavor , 1985 .

[32]  R. Ferl,et al.  Transcriptional control of alcohol dehydrogenase genes in plants. , 1990, International review of cytology.

[33]  R. Buttery,et al.  Characterization of additional volatile components of tomato , 1971 .

[34]  E. J. Stone,et al.  FORMATION OF ALDEHYDES AND ALCOHOLS IN TOMATO FRUIT FROM U‐14 C‐LABELED LINOLENIC AND LINOLEIC ACIDS , 1975 .

[35]  John E. Thompson,et al.  Subcellular generation and distribution of lipid-derived volatiles in the ripe tomato , 1997 .

[36]  Lee,et al.  Genetic manipulation of alcohol dehydrogenase levels in ripening tomato fruit affects the balance of some flavor aldehydes and alcohols , 1998, Plant physiology.

[37]  L. Ling,et al.  Increased lycopene and flavor volatile production in tomato calyces and fruit cultured in vitro and the effect of 2-(4-chlorophenylthio)triethylamine , 1998 .

[38]  R. Pressey,et al.  SOLUBILIZATION OF CELL WALLS BY TOMATO POLYGALACTURONASES: EFFECTS OF PECTINESTERASES , 1982 .

[39]  A. Handa,et al.  Molecular Cloning of a Ripening-Specific Lipoxygenase and Its Expression during Wild-Type and Mutant Tomato Fruit Development , 1997, Plant physiology.

[40]  J. Ray,et al.  Antisense inhibition of pectin esterase gene expression in transgenic tomatoes , 1993 .

[41]  E. Baldwin,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Flavor and Other Volatiles and for Certain Constituents of Two Tomato Cultivars during Ripening , 1991 .

[42]  J. Deikman Molecular mechanisms of ethylene regulation of gene transcription , 1997 .

[43]  R. Buttery,et al.  Furaneol: Odor Threshold and Importance to Tomato Aroma , 1995 .

[44]  C. Brady,et al.  DEVELOPMENTAL REGULATION OF THE EXPRESSION OF ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE IN RIPENING TOMATO FRUITS , 1990 .

[45]  J. Thompson,et al.  Purification and partial characterization of a membrane-associated lipoxygenase in tomato fruit. , 1992, Plant physiology.

[46]  W. Schuch,et al.  Reduced ethylene synthesis in EFE antisense tomatoes has differential effects on fruit ripening processes , 1993 .

[47]  J. Ray,et al.  Antisense RNA inhibition of polygalacturonase gene expression in transgenic tomatoes , 1988, Nature.

[48]  J. Ray,et al.  Using Antisense RNA to Study Gene Function: Inhibition of Carotenoid Biosynthesis in Transgenic Tomatoes , 1991, Bio/Technology.

[49]  Chi-Tang Ho,et al.  Changes of Fatty Acids and Fatty Acid-Derived Flavor Compounds by Expressing the Yeast Δ-9 Desaturase Gene in Tomato , 1996 .