A Theory of Finitely Durable Goods Monopoly with Used-Goods Market and Transaction Costs

We construct a dynamic game to model a monopoly of finitely durable goods. The solution concept is Markov-perfect equilibria with general equilibria embedded in every time period. Our model is flexible enough to simultaneously explain or accommodate many commonly observed phenomena or stylized facts, such as concurrent leasing and selling, active secondary markets for used goods, heterogeneous consumers, endogenous consumption patterns, depreciation, an infinite time horizon, and nontrivial transaction costs. Within our model, consumers have incentives to segment themselves into various consumption classes according to their willingness to pay, and nontrivial transaction costs to sell used goods put strong constraints on consumers' consumption sequences in time. As a direct consequence of the finite durability, the market power of the monopolist remains intact. Leasing manifests itself as a facilitator of price discrimination by debundling the durable good into new and used portions that are naturally bundled together under outright sales. The concurrent leasing and selling reflects the degree of the comparative advantage the monopolist has over consumers in disposing used goods. This comparative advantage, which is partially exploited by the monopolist and partially shared by the consumers, provides a sufficient mechanism to gain Pareto improvement on the market.

[1]  R. Coase Durability and Monopoly , 1972, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[2]  Nancy L. Stokey Rational Expectations and Durable Goods Pricing , 1981 .

[3]  Jeremy I. Bulow Durable-Goods Monopolists , 1982, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  E. Maskin,et al.  Overview and quantity competition with large fixed costs , 1988 .

[5]  Larry Samuelson,et al.  Durable Good Monopolies with Rational Expectations and Replacement Sales , 1984 .

[6]  Clifford W. Smith,et al.  Determinants of Corporate Leasing Policy , 1985 .

[7]  E. Maskin,et al.  A Theory of Dynamic Oligopoly, II: Price Competition , 1985 .

[8]  Robert B. Wilson,et al.  Foundations of Dynamic Monopoly and the Coase Conjecture , 1986 .

[9]  John Rust,et al.  When Is It Optimal to Kill Off the Market for Used Durable Goods , 1986 .

[10]  C. Kahn The Durable Goods Monopolist and Consistency with Increasing Costs , 1986 .

[11]  Sam Bucovetsky,et al.  Concurrent Renting and Selling in a Durable-Goods Monopoly Under Threat of Entry , 1986 .

[12]  Larry Samuelson,et al.  The Coase conjecture need not hold for durable good monopolies with depreciation , 1987 .

[13]  Eric Maskin,et al.  QUANTITY COMPETITION WITH LARGE FIXED COSTS , 1988 .

[14]  Lawrence M. Ausubel,et al.  REPUTATION IN BARGAINING AND DURABLE GOODS MONOPOLY , 1989 .

[15]  Stephen W. Salant,et al.  Durable-Goods Monopoly with Discrete Demand , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  Simon P. Anderson,et al.  Price discrimination via second-hand markets , 1994 .

[17]  Larry S. Karp,et al.  Depreciation Erodes the Coase Conjecture , 1996 .

[18]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Two Volume Set , 1995 .

[19]  Alessandro Lizzeri,et al.  Adverse Selection in Durable Goods Markets , 1997 .

[20]  Michael Waldman,et al.  Eliminating the Market for Secondhand Goods: An Alternative Explanation for Leasing1 , 1997, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[21]  Preyas S. Desai Leasing and Selling: Optimal Marketing Strategies for a Durable Goods Firm (Лизинг и продажи: оптимальные маркетинговые стратегии для изготовителя товаров длительного пользования) , 1998 .

[22]  I. Hendel,et al.  Interfering with Secondary Markets , 1999 .

[23]  I. Hendel,et al.  The Role of Leasing under Adverse Selection , 1998, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  Kai-Uwe Kuhn Intertemporal Price Discrimination in Frictionless Durable Goods Monopolies , 2003 .