Selective internal operations in the recognition of locally and globally point-inverted patterns.

Performance in discriminating rotated 'same' patterns from 'different' patterns may decrease with rotation angle up to about 90 degrees and then increase with angle up to 180 degrees. This anomalously improved performance under 180 degrees pattern rotation or point-inversion can be explained by assuming that patterns are internally represented in terms of local features and their spatial-order relations ('left of', 'above', etc.), and that, in pattern comparison, an efficient internal sense-reversal operation occurs (transforming 'left of' to 'right of', etc.). Previous experiments suggested that local features and spatial relations could not be efficiently separated in some pattern-comparison tasks. This hypothesis was tested by measuring 'same-different' discrimination performance under four transformation: point-inversion 1 of the whole pattern, point-inversion 1F of local features alone, point-inversion 1P of local-feature positions alone, and identity transformation Id. The results suggested that internal sense-reversal operations could be applied selectively and efficiently, provided that local features were well separated. Under this condition performances for 1F and 1 were about the same whereas performance for 1P was significantly worse, the latter performance resulting possibly from an attempt to apply internal global and local sense-reversal operations serially.

[1]  Paul A Kolers,et al.  Spatial and ordinal components of form perception and literacy , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  M. D. Arnoult Shape discrimination as a function of angular orientation of the stimuli. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[4]  D H Foster,et al.  Visual Comparison of Random-Dot Patterns: Evidence concerning a Fixed Visual Association between Features and Feature-Relations , 1978, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  N I Durlach,et al.  Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  P. A. Kolers,et al.  Orientation of letters and their speed of recognition , 1969 .

[7]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[8]  David H. Foster,et al.  Visual Comparison of Rotated and Reflected Random-Dot Patterns as a Function of Their Positional Symmetry and Separation in the Field* , 1981 .

[9]  N. Sutherland Outlines of a theory of visual pattern recognition in animals and man , 1968, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[10]  PV.,et al.  Contributions to the Analysis of the Sensations , 1897, Nature.

[11]  R. Shepard,et al.  CHRONOMETRIC STUDIES OF THE ROTATION OF MENTAL IMAGES , 1973 .

[12]  G. V. Dearborn Recognition under objective reversal. , 1899 .

[13]  H. Barlow,et al.  Visual pattern analysis in machines and animals. , 1972, Science.

[14]  Irvin Rock,et al.  Orientation and form , 1974 .

[15]  P. Thompson,et al.  Margaret Thatcher: A New Illusion , 1980, Perception.

[16]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium , 1976 .

[17]  E Galanter,et al.  A significance test for one parameter isosensitivity functions , 1967, Psychometrika.

[18]  J. Swets The Relative Operating Characteristic in Psychology , 1973, Science.