Oral diadochokinetic rates for normal Thai children.

BACKGROUND The diadochokinetic (DDK) rate represents an index for assessing motor skills. It is commonly used in routine clinical evaluation of diseases of the central nervous system, disturbances of the peripheral sensory motor formations and immaturity of the speech mechanism. Oral DDK rates are a popular guideline for the assessment, diagnosis and treatment of patients with a neurological deficit of the speech mechanism. Baseline DDK rates have been published for English-speaking children, but not for Thai-speaking children. Thailand is situated in South East Asia, and the language belongs to the monosyllabic, tonal, Sino-Tibetan group with extensive multisyllabic borrowings from the non-tonal, Pali-Sanskrit group. AIMS To assess the oral DDK rates for normal Thai children aged between 6 and 13 attending primary schools in order to establish a baseline for assessing, diagnosing and treating patients. METHODS & PROCEDURES Subjects included 197 students who repeated, in rapid succession, specified sounds representing different levels of physiologic complexity, as indicated by differences in the developmental schedule, articulatory placement and syllabic content. Twenty syllable repetitions were required for monosyllabic utterances, 15 for bisyllablics and 10 for trisyllablics. Visi Pitch Analysis was used to calculate the average time that subjects took to produce the sounds. OUTCOMES & RESULTS The time taken for the lip functions /pe,Cyrillic/, /a:-u:/, /u:-i/ and /i:-a:/ averaged 4.55, 6.67, 7.53 and 7.27 seconds, respectively. The tongue functions /te,Cyrillic/, /le,Cyrillic/, /ke,Cyrillic/ and click averaged 4.58, 4.82, 4.85 and 5.87 seconds, respectively. Tongue movement side-to-side between the corners of the mouth averaged 8.73 seconds, while the lip-tongue functions /pe,Cyrillic-te,Cyrillic/, /pe,Cyrillic-ke,Cyrillic/ and /pe,Cyrillic-te,Cyrillic-ke,Cyrillic/ were 6.97, 7.52 and 6.85 seconds, respectively. Sex and age influenced oral DDK time. The findings differ from those reported for English-speaking children. CONCLUSIONS A basis for assessment of children with neuromotor deficits or oral structure impairment is provided for both Thai and South East Asian children with similar physiological development and languages with similar sounds.

[1]  Yoshiaki Ozawa,et al.  Symptomatic Differences in Decreased Alternating Motion Rates between Individuals with Spastic and with Ataxic Dysarthria: An Acoustic Analysis , 2001, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[2]  M. McClean.  Patterns of orofacial movement velocity across variations in speech rate. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[3]  Pam Williams, Joy Stackhouse.  Rate, accuracy and consistency: diadochokinetic performance of young, normally developing children , 2000 .

[4]  D. Waters,et al.  Measuring speech motor skills in normally developing and phonologically disordered pre-school children , 1999 .

[5]  William W. Cohen,et al.  DDK rates in the paediatric clinic: a methodological minefield. , 1998, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[6]  B. Prathanee.  Oral diadochokinetic rate in adults. , 1998, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[7]  J. Stackhouse,et al.  Diadochokinetic skills: normal and atypical performance in children aged 3-5 years. , 1998, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[8]  B. Murdoch,et al.  Lip and tongue function in children with developmental speech disorders: A preliminary investigation , 1997 .

[9]  B. Dodd,et al.  Do all speech-disordered children have motor deficits? , 1996 .

[10]  R. Towne.  Effect of mandibular stabilization on the diadochokinetic performance of children with phonological disorder , 1994 .

[11]  A. Gross,et al.  Oral motor control, posturing, and myofunctional variables in 8-year-olds. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  M. Snowling,et al.  Developmental verbal dyspraxia. II: A developmental perspective on two case studies. , 1992, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.

[13]  J. Sciubba,et al.  Speech patterns following partial glossectomy for small tumors of the tongue , 1991, Head & neck.

[14]  M. Stone.  Imaging the tongue and vocal tract. , 1991, The British journal of disorders of communication.

[15]  C. E. Henry.  The development of oral diadochokinesia and non-linguistic rhythmic skills in normal and speech-disordered young children. , 1990, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[16]  J. D. Amerman,et al.  Perception of oral diadochokinetic performances in elderly adults. , 1987, Journal of communication disorders.

[17]  T. Klee,et al.  Clinical assessment of oropharyngeal motor development in young children. , 1987, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[18]  R. Newcombe,et al.  Oral stereognosis and diadokokinetic tests in children and young adults. , 1985, The British journal of disorders of communication.

[19]  J. Teichgraeber,et al.  New test series for the functional evaluation of oral cavity cancer. , 1985, Head & neck surgery.

[20]  M. Robb,et al.  Oral diadochokinesis in hearing-impaired adolescents. , 1985, Journal of communication disorders.

[21]  T. Shawker,et al.  Tongue motion in elderly adults: initial in situ observations. , 1984, Journal of gerontology.

[22]  A. Aronson,et al.  Diadochokinetic syllable rate and regularity in normal and in spastic and ataxic dysarthric subjects. , 1982, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[23]  W R Tiffany,et al.  The effects of syllable structure on diadochokinetic and reading rates. , 1980, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[24]  Lucille Nicolosi,et al.  Terminology of communication disorders , 1978 .

[25]  J. McNutt.  Oral sensory and motor behaviors of children with /s/ or /r/ misarticulations. , 1977, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[26]  R. M. Mason,et al.  Speech screening of children in the dental office. , 1977, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[27]  A. Aronson,et al.  Motor Speech Disorders , 2014 .

[28]  B. Canning,et al.  Clinical measurements of the speed of tongue and lip movements in British children with normal speech. , 1974, The British journal of disorders of communication.

[29]  S G Fletcher,et al.  Time-by-count measurement of diadochokinetic syllable rate. , 1972, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[30]  G. Fairbanks,et al.  A Study Of Minor Organic Deviations In ‘Functional’ Disorders Of Articulation: 1. Rate Of Movement Of Oral Structures , 1950 .